Cargando…
The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category
From the 19th century into the 20th century, the terms used to diagnose generalized anxiety included “pantophobia” and “anxiety neurosis.” Such terms designated paroxysmal manifestations (panic attacks) as well as interparoxysmal phenomenology (the apprehensive mental state). Also, generalized anxie...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Les Laboratoires Servier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867935 |
_version_ | 1783259684888641536 |
---|---|
author | Crocq, Marc-Antoine |
author_facet | Crocq, Marc-Antoine |
author_sort | Crocq, Marc-Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | From the 19th century into the 20th century, the terms used to diagnose generalized anxiety included “pantophobia” and “anxiety neurosis.” Such terms designated paroxysmal manifestations (panic attacks) as well as interparoxysmal phenomenology (the apprehensive mental state). Also, generalized anxiety was considered one of numerous symptoms of neurasthenia, a vaguely defined illness. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) appeared as a diagnostic category in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) in 1980, when anxiety neurosis was split into GAD and panic disorder. The distinct responses these two disorders had to imipramine therapy was one reason to distinguish between the two. Since the revised DSM-III (DSM-III-R), worry about a number of life circumstances has been gradually emphasized as the distinctive symptom of GAD. Thus, a cognitive aspect of anxiety has become the core criterion of GAD. The validity of GAD as an independent category has been questioned from DSM-III up to preparation of DSM-5. Areas of concern have included the difficulty to establish clear boundaries between GAD and (i) personality dimensions, (ii) other anxiety-spectrum disorders, and (iii) nonbipolar depression. The National Institute of Mental Health has recently proposed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), a framework destined to facilitate biological research into the etiology of mental symptoms. Within the RDoC framework, generalized anxiety might be studied as a dimension denominated “anxious apprehension” that would typically fit into the research domain called “negative valence systems” and the more specific construct termed “potential threat.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5573555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Les Laboratoires Servier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55735552017-09-01 The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category Crocq, Marc-Antoine Dialogues Clin Neurosci Clinical Research From the 19th century into the 20th century, the terms used to diagnose generalized anxiety included “pantophobia” and “anxiety neurosis.” Such terms designated paroxysmal manifestations (panic attacks) as well as interparoxysmal phenomenology (the apprehensive mental state). Also, generalized anxiety was considered one of numerous symptoms of neurasthenia, a vaguely defined illness. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) appeared as a diagnostic category in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) in 1980, when anxiety neurosis was split into GAD and panic disorder. The distinct responses these two disorders had to imipramine therapy was one reason to distinguish between the two. Since the revised DSM-III (DSM-III-R), worry about a number of life circumstances has been gradually emphasized as the distinctive symptom of GAD. Thus, a cognitive aspect of anxiety has become the core criterion of GAD. The validity of GAD as an independent category has been questioned from DSM-III up to preparation of DSM-5. Areas of concern have included the difficulty to establish clear boundaries between GAD and (i) personality dimensions, (ii) other anxiety-spectrum disorders, and (iii) nonbipolar depression. The National Institute of Mental Health has recently proposed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), a framework destined to facilitate biological research into the etiology of mental symptoms. Within the RDoC framework, generalized anxiety might be studied as a dimension denominated “anxious apprehension” that would typically fit into the research domain called “negative valence systems” and the more specific construct termed “potential threat.” Les Laboratoires Servier 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5573555/ /pubmed/28867935 Text en Copyright: © 2017 AICH - Servier Research Group. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Crocq, Marc-Antoine The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
title | The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
title_full | The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
title_fullStr | The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
title_full_unstemmed | The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
title_short | The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
title_sort | history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867935 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crocqmarcantoine thehistoryofgeneralizedanxietydisorderasadiagnosticcategory AT crocqmarcantoine historyofgeneralizedanxietydisorderasadiagnosticcategory |