Cargando…

Imaging in Vascular Access

This review examines four imaging modalities; ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), that have common or potential applications in vascular access (VA). The four modalities are reviewed under their primary uses, techniqu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Eoin A., Ross, Rose A., Jones, Robert G., Gandy, Stephen J., Aristokleous, Nicolas, Salsano, Marco, Weir-McCall, Jonathan R., Matthew, Shona, Houston, John Graeme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28707187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-017-0317-y
_version_ 1783259705222627328
author Murphy, Eoin A.
Ross, Rose A.
Jones, Robert G.
Gandy, Stephen J.
Aristokleous, Nicolas
Salsano, Marco
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R.
Matthew, Shona
Houston, John Graeme
author_facet Murphy, Eoin A.
Ross, Rose A.
Jones, Robert G.
Gandy, Stephen J.
Aristokleous, Nicolas
Salsano, Marco
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R.
Matthew, Shona
Houston, John Graeme
author_sort Murphy, Eoin A.
collection PubMed
description This review examines four imaging modalities; ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), that have common or potential applications in vascular access (VA). The four modalities are reviewed under their primary uses, techniques, advantages and disadvantages, and future directions that are specific to VA. Currently, US is the most commonly used modality in VA because it is cheaper (relative to other modalities), accessible, non-ionising, and does not require the use of contrast agents. DSA is predominantly only performed when an intervention is indicated. MRI is limited by its cost and the time required for image acquisition that mainly confines it to the realm of research where high resolution is required. CT’s short acquisition times and high resolution make it useful as a problem-solving tool in complex cases, although accessibility can be an issue. All four imaging modalities have advantages and disadvantages that limit their use in this particular patient cohort. Current imaging in VA comprises an integrated approach with each modality providing particular uses dependent on their capabilities. MRI and CT, which currently have limited use, may have increasingly important future roles in complex cases where detailed analysis is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55737612018-12-03 Imaging in Vascular Access Murphy, Eoin A. Ross, Rose A. Jones, Robert G. Gandy, Stephen J. Aristokleous, Nicolas Salsano, Marco Weir-McCall, Jonathan R. Matthew, Shona Houston, John Graeme Cardiovasc Eng Technol Article This review examines four imaging modalities; ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), that have common or potential applications in vascular access (VA). The four modalities are reviewed under their primary uses, techniques, advantages and disadvantages, and future directions that are specific to VA. Currently, US is the most commonly used modality in VA because it is cheaper (relative to other modalities), accessible, non-ionising, and does not require the use of contrast agents. DSA is predominantly only performed when an intervention is indicated. MRI is limited by its cost and the time required for image acquisition that mainly confines it to the realm of research where high resolution is required. CT’s short acquisition times and high resolution make it useful as a problem-solving tool in complex cases, although accessibility can be an issue. All four imaging modalities have advantages and disadvantages that limit their use in this particular patient cohort. Current imaging in VA comprises an integrated approach with each modality providing particular uses dependent on their capabilities. MRI and CT, which currently have limited use, may have increasingly important future roles in complex cases where detailed analysis is required. Springer US 2017-07-13 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5573761/ /pubmed/28707187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-017-0317-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Murphy, Eoin A.
Ross, Rose A.
Jones, Robert G.
Gandy, Stephen J.
Aristokleous, Nicolas
Salsano, Marco
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R.
Matthew, Shona
Houston, John Graeme
Imaging in Vascular Access
title Imaging in Vascular Access
title_full Imaging in Vascular Access
title_fullStr Imaging in Vascular Access
title_full_unstemmed Imaging in Vascular Access
title_short Imaging in Vascular Access
title_sort imaging in vascular access
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28707187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-017-0317-y
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyeoina imaginginvascularaccess
AT rossrosea imaginginvascularaccess
AT jonesrobertg imaginginvascularaccess
AT gandystephenj imaginginvascularaccess
AT aristokleousnicolas imaginginvascularaccess
AT salsanomarco imaginginvascularaccess
AT weirmccalljonathanr imaginginvascularaccess
AT matthewshona imaginginvascularaccess
AT houstonjohngraeme imaginginvascularaccess