Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews

BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of the need to promote physical activity, the existing evidence base on the cost-effectiveness of relevant interventions appears scant and scattered. This systematic review of reviews set out to take stock of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abu-Omar, Karim, Rütten, Alfred, Burlacu, Ionuţ, Schätzlein, Valentin, Messing, Sven, Suhrcke, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28856084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.08.006
_version_ 1783259708881108992
author Abu-Omar, Karim
Rütten, Alfred
Burlacu, Ionuţ
Schätzlein, Valentin
Messing, Sven
Suhrcke, Marc
author_facet Abu-Omar, Karim
Rütten, Alfred
Burlacu, Ionuţ
Schätzlein, Valentin
Messing, Sven
Suhrcke, Marc
author_sort Abu-Omar, Karim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of the need to promote physical activity, the existing evidence base on the cost-effectiveness of relevant interventions appears scant and scattered. This systematic review of reviews set out to take stock of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions. METHODS: Ten literature databases were systematically searched for available reviews on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions, complemented by a hand search. Out of the 515 articles identified, 18 reviews met the inclusion criteria. A quality appraisal of the 18 reviews was undertaken. RESULTS: Of the 18 reviews, 4 contained information on the target group of children and adolescents, 12 on adults, 3 on older adults, and 6 on the general population. Across the reviews some intervention strategies were identified as being particularly cost-effective, including certain school-based interventions (children and adolescents), interventions using pedometers (adults), fall prevention programs (older people), mass media campaigns and environmental approaches (general population). However, for some of these approaches (e.g. mass media campaigns), the underlying evidence of being able to change physical activity behavior remains inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Available evidence for the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions is scattered, but points towards the cost-effectiveness of certain interventions. Until this moment, cost-effectiveness has more often been studied for individual-level interventions. This is potentially due to some methodological challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of population-based interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55737822017-08-30 The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews Abu-Omar, Karim Rütten, Alfred Burlacu, Ionuţ Schätzlein, Valentin Messing, Sven Suhrcke, Marc Prev Med Rep Review Article BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition of the need to promote physical activity, the existing evidence base on the cost-effectiveness of relevant interventions appears scant and scattered. This systematic review of reviews set out to take stock of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions. METHODS: Ten literature databases were systematically searched for available reviews on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions, complemented by a hand search. Out of the 515 articles identified, 18 reviews met the inclusion criteria. A quality appraisal of the 18 reviews was undertaken. RESULTS: Of the 18 reviews, 4 contained information on the target group of children and adolescents, 12 on adults, 3 on older adults, and 6 on the general population. Across the reviews some intervention strategies were identified as being particularly cost-effective, including certain school-based interventions (children and adolescents), interventions using pedometers (adults), fall prevention programs (older people), mass media campaigns and environmental approaches (general population). However, for some of these approaches (e.g. mass media campaigns), the underlying evidence of being able to change physical activity behavior remains inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Available evidence for the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions is scattered, but points towards the cost-effectiveness of certain interventions. Until this moment, cost-effectiveness has more often been studied for individual-level interventions. This is potentially due to some methodological challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of population-based interventions. Elsevier 2017-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5573782/ /pubmed/28856084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.08.006 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Abu-Omar, Karim
Rütten, Alfred
Burlacu, Ionuţ
Schätzlein, Valentin
Messing, Sven
Suhrcke, Marc
The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews
title The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews
title_full The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews
title_short The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews
title_sort cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: a systematic review of reviews
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28856084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.08.006
work_keys_str_mv AT abuomarkarim thecosteffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT ruttenalfred thecosteffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT burlacuionut thecosteffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT schatzleinvalentin thecosteffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT messingsven thecosteffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT suhrckemarc thecosteffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT abuomarkarim costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT ruttenalfred costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT burlacuionut costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT schatzleinvalentin costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT messingsven costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT suhrckemarc costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsasystematicreviewofreviews