Cargando…

Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs

Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ONUMA, Mamoru, TERADA, Misao, ONO, Sadaharu, MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi, ISHIDA, Tomoko, SANO, Tadashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0550
_version_ 1783259720987967488
author ONUMA, Mamoru
TERADA, Misao
ONO, Sadaharu
MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi
ISHIDA, Tomoko
SANO, Tadashi
author_facet ONUMA, Mamoru
TERADA, Misao
ONO, Sadaharu
MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi
ISHIDA, Tomoko
SANO, Tadashi
author_sort ONUMA, Mamoru
collection PubMed
description Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse events in dogs with allergy to egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil. On the basis of the findings of an allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, 14 dogs with high levels (high-IgE group) and 7 dogs with low levels (normal-IgE group) of IgE were selected. Following intravenous administration of propofol, the incidence of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations under general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane throughout surgery were compared between the two groups. The frequency of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations were compared by the chi-square test and Student t-test, respectively. The statistical significance for both tests was set at P<0.05. In the high- and normal-IgE groups, the average frequencies of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration were 21.4 and 14.3%, and the mean plasma histamine concentrations were 167.9 ± 94.5 nM and 65.7 ± 40.3 nM, respectively. Animals of neither groups experienced shock-like symptoms. These results revealed that propofol might be relatively safe, although careful perioperative anesthesia monitoring and standby protocols are required when using propofol in dogs with a history of allergic diseases or high chicken- or soybean-specific IgE levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55738352017-08-29 Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs ONUMA, Mamoru TERADA, Misao ONO, Sadaharu MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi ISHIDA, Tomoko SANO, Tadashi J Vet Med Sci Surgery Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse events in dogs with allergy to egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil. On the basis of the findings of an allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, 14 dogs with high levels (high-IgE group) and 7 dogs with low levels (normal-IgE group) of IgE were selected. Following intravenous administration of propofol, the incidence of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations under general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane throughout surgery were compared between the two groups. The frequency of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations were compared by the chi-square test and Student t-test, respectively. The statistical significance for both tests was set at P<0.05. In the high- and normal-IgE groups, the average frequencies of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration were 21.4 and 14.3%, and the mean plasma histamine concentrations were 167.9 ± 94.5 nM and 65.7 ± 40.3 nM, respectively. Animals of neither groups experienced shock-like symptoms. These results revealed that propofol might be relatively safe, although careful perioperative anesthesia monitoring and standby protocols are required when using propofol in dogs with a history of allergic diseases or high chicken- or soybean-specific IgE levels. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2017-07-14 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5573835/ /pubmed/28717055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0550 Text en ©2017 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Surgery
ONUMA, Mamoru
TERADA, Misao
ONO, Sadaharu
MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi
ISHIDA, Tomoko
SANO, Tadashi
Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
title Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
title_full Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
title_fullStr Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
title_short Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
title_sort incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0550
work_keys_str_mv AT onumamamoru incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs
AT teradamisao incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs
AT onosadaharu incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs
AT murakamiakiyoshi incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs
AT ishidatomoko incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs
AT sanotadashi incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs