Cargando…
Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs
Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0550 |
_version_ | 1783259720987967488 |
---|---|
author | ONUMA, Mamoru TERADA, Misao ONO, Sadaharu MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi ISHIDA, Tomoko SANO, Tadashi |
author_facet | ONUMA, Mamoru TERADA, Misao ONO, Sadaharu MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi ISHIDA, Tomoko SANO, Tadashi |
author_sort | ONUMA, Mamoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse events in dogs with allergy to egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil. On the basis of the findings of an allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, 14 dogs with high levels (high-IgE group) and 7 dogs with low levels (normal-IgE group) of IgE were selected. Following intravenous administration of propofol, the incidence of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations under general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane throughout surgery were compared between the two groups. The frequency of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations were compared by the chi-square test and Student t-test, respectively. The statistical significance for both tests was set at P<0.05. In the high- and normal-IgE groups, the average frequencies of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration were 21.4 and 14.3%, and the mean plasma histamine concentrations were 167.9 ± 94.5 nM and 65.7 ± 40.3 nM, respectively. Animals of neither groups experienced shock-like symptoms. These results revealed that propofol might be relatively safe, although careful perioperative anesthesia monitoring and standby protocols are required when using propofol in dogs with a history of allergic diseases or high chicken- or soybean-specific IgE levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5573835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55738352017-08-29 Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs ONUMA, Mamoru TERADA, Misao ONO, Sadaharu MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi ISHIDA, Tomoko SANO, Tadashi J Vet Med Sci Surgery Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse events in dogs with allergy to egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil. On the basis of the findings of an allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, 14 dogs with high levels (high-IgE group) and 7 dogs with low levels (normal-IgE group) of IgE were selected. Following intravenous administration of propofol, the incidence of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations under general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane throughout surgery were compared between the two groups. The frequency of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations were compared by the chi-square test and Student t-test, respectively. The statistical significance for both tests was set at P<0.05. In the high- and normal-IgE groups, the average frequencies of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration were 21.4 and 14.3%, and the mean plasma histamine concentrations were 167.9 ± 94.5 nM and 65.7 ± 40.3 nM, respectively. Animals of neither groups experienced shock-like symptoms. These results revealed that propofol might be relatively safe, although careful perioperative anesthesia monitoring and standby protocols are required when using propofol in dogs with a history of allergic diseases or high chicken- or soybean-specific IgE levels. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2017-07-14 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5573835/ /pubmed/28717055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0550 Text en ©2017 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Surgery ONUMA, Mamoru TERADA, Misao ONO, Sadaharu MURAKAMI, Akiyoshi ISHIDA, Tomoko SANO, Tadashi Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs |
title | Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in
dogs |
title_full | Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in
dogs |
title_fullStr | Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in
dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in
dogs |
title_short | Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in
dogs |
title_sort | incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in
dogs |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onumamamoru incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs AT teradamisao incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs AT onosadaharu incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs AT murakamiakiyoshi incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs AT ishidatomoko incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs AT sanotadashi incidenceofanaphylacticreactionsafterpropofoladministrationindogs |