Cargando…
Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification
The assumption of equivalence between measurement-model configurations across groups is typically investigated by evaluating overall fit of the same model simultaneously to multiple samples. However, the null hypothesis (H(0)) of configural invariance is distinct from the H(0) of overall model fit....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01455 |
_version_ | 1783259728891084800 |
---|---|
author | Jorgensen, Terrence D. |
author_facet | Jorgensen, Terrence D. |
author_sort | Jorgensen, Terrence D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The assumption of equivalence between measurement-model configurations across groups is typically investigated by evaluating overall fit of the same model simultaneously to multiple samples. However, the null hypothesis (H(0)) of configural invariance is distinct from the H(0) of overall model fit. Permutation tests of configural invariance yield nominal Type I error rates even when a model does not fit perfectly (Jorgensen et al., 2017, in press). When the configural model requires modification, lack of evidence against configural invariance implies that researchers should reconsider their model's structure simultaneously across all groups. Application of multivariate modification indices is therefore proposed to help decide which parameter(s) to free simultaneously in all groups, and I present Monte Carlo simulation results comparing their Type I error control to traditional 1-df modification indices. I use the Holzinger and Swineford (1939) data set to illustrate these methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5573877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55738772017-09-07 Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification Jorgensen, Terrence D. Front Psychol Psychology The assumption of equivalence between measurement-model configurations across groups is typically investigated by evaluating overall fit of the same model simultaneously to multiple samples. However, the null hypothesis (H(0)) of configural invariance is distinct from the H(0) of overall model fit. Permutation tests of configural invariance yield nominal Type I error rates even when a model does not fit perfectly (Jorgensen et al., 2017, in press). When the configural model requires modification, lack of evidence against configural invariance implies that researchers should reconsider their model's structure simultaneously across all groups. Application of multivariate modification indices is therefore proposed to help decide which parameter(s) to free simultaneously in all groups, and I present Monte Carlo simulation results comparing their Type I error control to traditional 1-df modification indices. I use the Holzinger and Swineford (1939) data set to illustrate these methods. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5573877/ /pubmed/28883805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01455 Text en Copyright © 2017 Jorgensen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Jorgensen, Terrence D. Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification |
title | Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification |
title_full | Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification |
title_fullStr | Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification |
title_short | Applying Permutation Tests and Multivariate Modification Indices to Configurally Invariant Models That Need Respecification |
title_sort | applying permutation tests and multivariate modification indices to configurally invariant models that need respecification |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jorgensenterrenced applyingpermutationtestsandmultivariatemodificationindicestoconfigurallyinvariantmodelsthatneedrespecification |