Cargando…
ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability
Posterior glenohumeral instability (PGHI) is a commonly under- and misdiagnosed pathology owing to its variety of clinical presentations. In order to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, the simple yet comprehensive ABC classification for PGHI is based on the underlying pathomechanical principles and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-017-0404-6 |
_version_ | 1783259765529378816 |
---|---|
author | Moroder, Philipp Scheibel, Markus |
author_facet | Moroder, Philipp Scheibel, Markus |
author_sort | Moroder, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | Posterior glenohumeral instability (PGHI) is a commonly under- and misdiagnosed pathology owing to its variety of clinical presentations. In order to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, the simple yet comprehensive ABC classification for PGHI is based on the underlying pathomechanical principles and current standard of treatment. Three main groups of PGHI are distinguished based on the type of instability: A (first time), B (dynamic), C (static). Two subtypes further differentiate these groups in terms of their specific pathomechanism and provide a guideline in the choice of appropriate treatment: A (1, subluxation; 2, dislocation), B (1, functional; 2, structural), C (1, constitutional; 2, acquired). While conservative treatment is warranted in most patients with type 1 PGHI (A1, B1, C1), surgical treatment should be considered on an individual basis in patients with type 2 PGHI (A2, B2, C2), while keeping in mind that the different groups and subtypes can overlap, co-exist, or even progress from one to another over time. Of course the necessity for surgical treatment depends on the extent of the structural defects, on the severity of symptoms, on the chronicity, as well as on patient-specific functional demand, age, and health status. Nonetheless, the ABC classification helps to correctly diagnose the type of PGHI and provides a guideline for the generally recommended type of treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s11678-017-0404-6) contains supplementary material (Video), which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5574063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55740632017-08-29 ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability Moroder, Philipp Scheibel, Markus Obere Extrem Review Article Posterior glenohumeral instability (PGHI) is a commonly under- and misdiagnosed pathology owing to its variety of clinical presentations. In order to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, the simple yet comprehensive ABC classification for PGHI is based on the underlying pathomechanical principles and current standard of treatment. Three main groups of PGHI are distinguished based on the type of instability: A (first time), B (dynamic), C (static). Two subtypes further differentiate these groups in terms of their specific pathomechanism and provide a guideline in the choice of appropriate treatment: A (1, subluxation; 2, dislocation), B (1, functional; 2, structural), C (1, constitutional; 2, acquired). While conservative treatment is warranted in most patients with type 1 PGHI (A1, B1, C1), surgical treatment should be considered on an individual basis in patients with type 2 PGHI (A2, B2, C2), while keeping in mind that the different groups and subtypes can overlap, co-exist, or even progress from one to another over time. Of course the necessity for surgical treatment depends on the extent of the structural defects, on the severity of symptoms, on the chronicity, as well as on patient-specific functional demand, age, and health status. Nonetheless, the ABC classification helps to correctly diagnose the type of PGHI and provides a guideline for the generally recommended type of treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s11678-017-0404-6) contains supplementary material (Video), which is available to authorized users. Springer Medizin 2017-04-20 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5574063/ /pubmed/28861125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-017-0404-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Moroder, Philipp Scheibel, Markus ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability |
title | ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability |
title_full | ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability |
title_fullStr | ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability |
title_full_unstemmed | ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability |
title_short | ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability |
title_sort | abc classification of posterior shoulder instability |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-017-0404-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moroderphilipp abcclassificationofposteriorshoulderinstability AT scheibelmarkus abcclassificationofposteriorshoulderinstability |