Cargando…

Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda

BACKGROUND: Offering a trial of labor (ToL) after previous caesarean section (CS) is an important strategy to reduce short- and long-term morbidity associated with repeated CS. We compared maternal and perinatal outcomes between ToL and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) at a district hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalisa, Richard, Rulisa, Stephen, van Roosmalen, Jos, van den Akker, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5
_version_ 1783259767011016704
author Kalisa, Richard
Rulisa, Stephen
van Roosmalen, Jos
van den Akker, Thomas
author_facet Kalisa, Richard
Rulisa, Stephen
van Roosmalen, Jos
van den Akker, Thomas
author_sort Kalisa, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Offering a trial of labor (ToL) after previous caesarean section (CS) is an important strategy to reduce short- and long-term morbidity associated with repeated CS. We compared maternal and perinatal outcomes between ToL and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) at a district hospital in rural Rwanda. METHODS: Audit of women’s records with one prior CS who delivered at Ruhengeri district hospital in Rwanda between June 2013 and December 2014. RESULTS: Out of 4131 women who came for delivery, 435 (11%) had scarred uteri. ToL, which often started at home or at health centers without appropriate counseling, occurred in 297/435 women (68.3%), while 138 women (31.7%) delivered by ERCS. ToL was successful in 134/297 (45.1%) women. There were no maternal deaths. Twenty-eight out of all 435 women with a scarred uterus (6.4%) sustained severe acute maternal morbidity (puerperal sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture), which was higher in women with ToL (n = 23, 7.7%) compared with women who had an ERCS (n = 5, 3.6%): adjusted odds ration (aOR) 1.4 (95% CI 1.2–5.4). There was no difference in neonatal admissions between women who underwent ToL (n = 64/297; 21.5%) and those who delivered by ERCS (n = 35/138; 25.4%: aOR 0.8; CI 0.5–1.6). The majority of admissions were due to perinatal asphyxia that occurred more often in infants whose mothers underwent ToL (n = 40, 13.4%) compared to those who delivered by ERCS (n = 15, 10.9%: aOR 1.9; CI 1.6–3.6). Perinatal mortality was similar among infants whose mothers had ToL (n = 8; 27/1000 ToLs) and infants whose mothers underwent ERCS (n = 4; 29/1000 ERCSs). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of women delivering at a rural Rwandan hospital had scarred uteri. Severe acute maternal morbidity was higher in the ToL group, perinatal mortality did not differ. ToL took place under suboptimal conditions: access for women with scarred uteri into a facility with 24-h surgery should be guaranteed to increase the safety of ToL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5574082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55740822017-08-30 Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda Kalisa, Richard Rulisa, Stephen van Roosmalen, Jos van den Akker, Thomas BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Offering a trial of labor (ToL) after previous caesarean section (CS) is an important strategy to reduce short- and long-term morbidity associated with repeated CS. We compared maternal and perinatal outcomes between ToL and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) at a district hospital in rural Rwanda. METHODS: Audit of women’s records with one prior CS who delivered at Ruhengeri district hospital in Rwanda between June 2013 and December 2014. RESULTS: Out of 4131 women who came for delivery, 435 (11%) had scarred uteri. ToL, which often started at home or at health centers without appropriate counseling, occurred in 297/435 women (68.3%), while 138 women (31.7%) delivered by ERCS. ToL was successful in 134/297 (45.1%) women. There were no maternal deaths. Twenty-eight out of all 435 women with a scarred uterus (6.4%) sustained severe acute maternal morbidity (puerperal sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture), which was higher in women with ToL (n = 23, 7.7%) compared with women who had an ERCS (n = 5, 3.6%): adjusted odds ration (aOR) 1.4 (95% CI 1.2–5.4). There was no difference in neonatal admissions between women who underwent ToL (n = 64/297; 21.5%) and those who delivered by ERCS (n = 35/138; 25.4%: aOR 0.8; CI 0.5–1.6). The majority of admissions were due to perinatal asphyxia that occurred more often in infants whose mothers underwent ToL (n = 40, 13.4%) compared to those who delivered by ERCS (n = 15, 10.9%: aOR 1.9; CI 1.6–3.6). Perinatal mortality was similar among infants whose mothers had ToL (n = 8; 27/1000 ToLs) and infants whose mothers underwent ERCS (n = 4; 29/1000 ERCSs). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of women delivering at a rural Rwandan hospital had scarred uteri. Severe acute maternal morbidity was higher in the ToL group, perinatal mortality did not differ. ToL took place under suboptimal conditions: access for women with scarred uteri into a facility with 24-h surgery should be guaranteed to increase the safety of ToL. BioMed Central 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5574082/ /pubmed/28841838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kalisa, Richard
Rulisa, Stephen
van Roosmalen, Jos
van den Akker, Thomas
Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda
title Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda
title_full Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda
title_fullStr Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda
title_full_unstemmed Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda
title_short Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda
title_sort maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural rwanda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kalisarichard maternalandperinataloutcomeafterpreviouscaesareansectioninruralrwanda
AT rulisastephen maternalandperinataloutcomeafterpreviouscaesareansectioninruralrwanda
AT vanroosmalenjos maternalandperinataloutcomeafterpreviouscaesareansectioninruralrwanda
AT vandenakkerthomas maternalandperinataloutcomeafterpreviouscaesareansectioninruralrwanda