Cargando…

The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olstad, Dana Lee, Crawford, David A, Abbott, Gavin, McNaughton, Sarah A, Le, Ha ND, Ni Mhurchu, Cliona, Pollard, Christina, Ball, Kylie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0
_version_ 1783259776846659584
author Olstad, Dana Lee
Crawford, David A
Abbott, Gavin
McNaughton, Sarah A
Le, Ha ND
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Pollard, Christina
Ball, Kylie
author_facet Olstad, Dana Lee
Crawford, David A
Abbott, Gavin
McNaughton, Sarah A
Le, Ha ND
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Pollard, Christina
Ball, Kylie
author_sort Olstad, Dana Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period. METHODS: Participants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher’s exact and χ(2) tests assessed differences among groups in the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression assessed differences among groups in the change in proportionate FV purchasing over time. RESULTS: Post-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5574131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55741312017-08-30 The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial Olstad, Dana Lee Crawford, David A Abbott, Gavin McNaughton, Sarah A Le, Ha ND Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Pollard, Christina Ball, Kylie Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Short Paper BACKGROUND: The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period. METHODS: Participants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher’s exact and χ(2) tests assessed differences among groups in the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression assessed differences among groups in the change in proportionate FV purchasing over time. RESULTS: Post-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901). BioMed Central 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5574131/ /pubmed/28841892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Paper
Olstad, Dana Lee
Crawford, David A
Abbott, Gavin
McNaughton, Sarah A
Le, Ha ND
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Pollard, Christina
Ball, Kylie
The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
title The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
title_full The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
title_short The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
topic Short Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0
work_keys_str_mv AT olstaddanalee theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT crawforddavida theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abbottgavin theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcnaughtonsaraha theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lehand theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nimhurchucliona theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pollardchristina theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ballkylie theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olstaddanalee impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT crawforddavida impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abbottgavin impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcnaughtonsaraha impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lehand impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nimhurchucliona impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pollardchristina impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ballkylie impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial