Cargando…
The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0 |
_version_ | 1783259776846659584 |
---|---|
author | Olstad, Dana Lee Crawford, David A Abbott, Gavin McNaughton, Sarah A Le, Ha ND Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Pollard, Christina Ball, Kylie |
author_facet | Olstad, Dana Lee Crawford, David A Abbott, Gavin McNaughton, Sarah A Le, Ha ND Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Pollard, Christina Ball, Kylie |
author_sort | Olstad, Dana Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period. METHODS: Participants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher’s exact and χ(2) tests assessed differences among groups in the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression assessed differences among groups in the change in proportionate FV purchasing over time. RESULTS: Post-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5574131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55741312017-08-30 The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial Olstad, Dana Lee Crawford, David A Abbott, Gavin McNaughton, Sarah A Le, Ha ND Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Pollard, Christina Ball, Kylie Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Short Paper BACKGROUND: The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period. METHODS: Participants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher’s exact and χ(2) tests assessed differences among groups in the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression assessed differences among groups in the change in proportionate FV purchasing over time. RESULTS: Post-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901). BioMed Central 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5574131/ /pubmed/28841892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Paper Olstad, Dana Lee Crawford, David A Abbott, Gavin McNaughton, Sarah A Le, Ha ND Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Pollard, Christina Ball, Kylie The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
title | The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial |
topic | Short Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olstaddanalee theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT crawforddavida theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT abbottgavin theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcnaughtonsaraha theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lehand theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nimhurchucliona theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pollardchristina theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ballkylie theimpactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT olstaddanalee impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT crawforddavida impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT abbottgavin impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcnaughtonsaraha impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lehand impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nimhurchucliona impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pollardchristina impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ballkylie impactoffinancialincentivesonparticipantsfoodpurchasingpatternsinasupermarketbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial |