Cargando…
An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia
BACKGROUND: Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) progresses uniquely in each patient. However, patients are typically treated with the same types of chemotherapy, despite biological differences that lead to differential responses to treatment. RESULTS: Here we present a multi-lineage multi-compartment m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0469-2 |
_version_ | 1783259780996923392 |
---|---|
author | Sarker, Joyatee M. Pearce, Serena M. Nelson, Robert P. Kinzer-Ursem, Tamara L. Umulis, David M. Rundell, Ann E. |
author_facet | Sarker, Joyatee M. Pearce, Serena M. Nelson, Robert P. Kinzer-Ursem, Tamara L. Umulis, David M. Rundell, Ann E. |
author_sort | Sarker, Joyatee M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) progresses uniquely in each patient. However, patients are typically treated with the same types of chemotherapy, despite biological differences that lead to differential responses to treatment. RESULTS: Here we present a multi-lineage multi-compartment model of the hematopoietic system that captures patient-to-patient variation in both the concentration and rates of change of hematopoietic cell populations. By constraining the model against clinical hematopoietic cell recovery data derived from patients who have received induction chemotherapy, we identified trends for parameters that must be met by the model; for example, the mitosis rates and the probability of self-renewal of progenitor cells are inversely related. Within the data-consistent models, we found 22,796 parameter sets that meet chemotherapy response criteria. Simulations of these parameter sets display diverse dynamics in the cell populations. To identify large trends in these model outputs, we clustered the simulated cell population dynamics using k-means clustering and identified thirteen ‘representative patient’ dynamics. In each of these patient clusters, we simulated AML and found that clusters with the greatest mitotic capacity experience clinical cancer outcomes more likely to lead to shorter survival times. Conversely, other parameters, including lower death rates or mobilization rates, did not correlate with survival times. CONCLUSIONS: Using the multi-lineage model of hematopoiesis, we have identified several key features that determine leukocyte homeostasis, including self-renewal probabilities and mitosis rates, but not mobilization rates. Other influential parameters that regulate AML model behavior are responses to cytokines/growth factors produced in peripheral blood that target the probability of self-renewal of neutrophil progenitors. Finally, our model predicts that the mitosis rate of cancer is the most predictive parameter for survival time, followed closely by parameters that affect the self-renewal of cancer stem cells; most current therapies target mitosis rate, but based on our results, we propose that additional therapeutic targeting of self-renewal of cancer stem cells will lead to even higher survival rates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-017-0469-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5574150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55741502017-08-30 An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia Sarker, Joyatee M. Pearce, Serena M. Nelson, Robert P. Kinzer-Ursem, Tamara L. Umulis, David M. Rundell, Ann E. BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) progresses uniquely in each patient. However, patients are typically treated with the same types of chemotherapy, despite biological differences that lead to differential responses to treatment. RESULTS: Here we present a multi-lineage multi-compartment model of the hematopoietic system that captures patient-to-patient variation in both the concentration and rates of change of hematopoietic cell populations. By constraining the model against clinical hematopoietic cell recovery data derived from patients who have received induction chemotherapy, we identified trends for parameters that must be met by the model; for example, the mitosis rates and the probability of self-renewal of progenitor cells are inversely related. Within the data-consistent models, we found 22,796 parameter sets that meet chemotherapy response criteria. Simulations of these parameter sets display diverse dynamics in the cell populations. To identify large trends in these model outputs, we clustered the simulated cell population dynamics using k-means clustering and identified thirteen ‘representative patient’ dynamics. In each of these patient clusters, we simulated AML and found that clusters with the greatest mitotic capacity experience clinical cancer outcomes more likely to lead to shorter survival times. Conversely, other parameters, including lower death rates or mobilization rates, did not correlate with survival times. CONCLUSIONS: Using the multi-lineage model of hematopoiesis, we have identified several key features that determine leukocyte homeostasis, including self-renewal probabilities and mitosis rates, but not mobilization rates. Other influential parameters that regulate AML model behavior are responses to cytokines/growth factors produced in peripheral blood that target the probability of self-renewal of neutrophil progenitors. Finally, our model predicts that the mitosis rate of cancer is the most predictive parameter for survival time, followed closely by parameters that affect the self-renewal of cancer stem cells; most current therapies target mitosis rate, but based on our results, we propose that additional therapeutic targeting of self-renewal of cancer stem cells will lead to even higher survival rates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-017-0469-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5574150/ /pubmed/28841879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0469-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sarker, Joyatee M. Pearce, Serena M. Nelson, Robert P. Kinzer-Ursem, Tamara L. Umulis, David M. Rundell, Ann E. An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
title | An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
title_full | An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
title_fullStr | An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
title_short | An Integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
title_sort | integrative multi-lineage model of variation in leukopoiesis and acute myelogenous leukemia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0469-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarkerjoyateem anintegrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT pearceserenam anintegrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT nelsonrobertp anintegrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT kinzerursemtamaral anintegrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT umulisdavidm anintegrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT rundellanne anintegrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT sarkerjoyateem integrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT pearceserenam integrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT nelsonrobertp integrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT kinzerursemtamaral integrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT umulisdavidm integrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia AT rundellanne integrativemultilineagemodelofvariationinleukopoiesisandacutemyelogenousleukemia |