Cargando…
Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms
BACKGROUND: Delayed perforation is a rare but severe complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm (EGN). The aim of this study was to clarify clinical factors related to delayed perforation after ESD. METHODS: A total of 1158 consecutive patients with 1199 EGNs u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28894466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7404613 |
_version_ | 1783259806223564800 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Yoshinobu Nishisaki, Hogara Sakai, Hideki Tokuyama, Nagahiro Sawai, Hiroaki Sakai, Aya Mimura, Takuya Kushida, Saeko Tsumura, Hidetaka Sakamoto, Takeshi Miki, Ikuya Tsuda, Masahiro Inokuchi, Hideto |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Yoshinobu Nishisaki, Hogara Sakai, Hideki Tokuyama, Nagahiro Sawai, Hiroaki Sakai, Aya Mimura, Takuya Kushida, Saeko Tsumura, Hidetaka Sakamoto, Takeshi Miki, Ikuya Tsuda, Masahiro Inokuchi, Hideto |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Yoshinobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delayed perforation is a rare but severe complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm (EGN). The aim of this study was to clarify clinical factors related to delayed perforation after ESD. METHODS: A total of 1158 consecutive patients with 1199 EGNs underwent ESD at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2015. Univariate analysis was used to identify clinicopathological factors related to delayed perforation. Moreover, duration of cautery needed for hemostasis was measured by comparison between perforated and nonperforated points in patients with delayed perforation. RESULTS: Delayed perforation occurred in 5 of 1158 consecutive patients with 1199 EGNs who underwent ESD (0.42%). All cases were diagnosed within 24 h after ESD and recovered with conservative management. On univariate analysis, location in the upper stomach was the factor most significantly associated with delayed perforation (P < 0.01). Duration of cautery needed for hemostasis was significantly longer at perforated points (9 s) than at nonperforated points (3.5 s) in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: Location in the upper stomach was the risk factor most prominently associated with delayed perforation after ESD for EGNs. In addition, delayed perforation appears associated with excessive electrocautery for hemostasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5574302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55743022017-09-11 Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms Yamamoto, Yoshinobu Nishisaki, Hogara Sakai, Hideki Tokuyama, Nagahiro Sawai, Hiroaki Sakai, Aya Mimura, Takuya Kushida, Saeko Tsumura, Hidetaka Sakamoto, Takeshi Miki, Ikuya Tsuda, Masahiro Inokuchi, Hideto Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Delayed perforation is a rare but severe complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm (EGN). The aim of this study was to clarify clinical factors related to delayed perforation after ESD. METHODS: A total of 1158 consecutive patients with 1199 EGNs underwent ESD at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2015. Univariate analysis was used to identify clinicopathological factors related to delayed perforation. Moreover, duration of cautery needed for hemostasis was measured by comparison between perforated and nonperforated points in patients with delayed perforation. RESULTS: Delayed perforation occurred in 5 of 1158 consecutive patients with 1199 EGNs who underwent ESD (0.42%). All cases were diagnosed within 24 h after ESD and recovered with conservative management. On univariate analysis, location in the upper stomach was the factor most significantly associated with delayed perforation (P < 0.01). Duration of cautery needed for hemostasis was significantly longer at perforated points (9 s) than at nonperforated points (3.5 s) in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: Location in the upper stomach was the risk factor most prominently associated with delayed perforation after ESD for EGNs. In addition, delayed perforation appears associated with excessive electrocautery for hemostasis. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5574302/ /pubmed/28894466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7404613 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yoshinobu Yamamoto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yamamoto, Yoshinobu Nishisaki, Hogara Sakai, Hideki Tokuyama, Nagahiro Sawai, Hiroaki Sakai, Aya Mimura, Takuya Kushida, Saeko Tsumura, Hidetaka Sakamoto, Takeshi Miki, Ikuya Tsuda, Masahiro Inokuchi, Hideto Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms |
title | Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms |
title_full | Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms |
title_fullStr | Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms |
title_short | Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms |
title_sort | clinical factors of delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28894466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7404613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotoyoshinobu clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT nishisakihogara clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT sakaihideki clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT tokuyamanagahiro clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT sawaihiroaki clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT sakaiaya clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT mimuratakuya clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT kushidasaeko clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT tsumurahidetaka clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT sakamototakeshi clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT mikiikuya clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT tsudamasahiro clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms AT inokuchihideto clinicalfactorsofdelayedperforationafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricneoplasms |