Cargando…

In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?

AIMS: Despite the proven benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), utilization rates remain below recommendation in the percutaneous coronary intervention cohort in most European countries. Although extensive research has been carried out on CR uptake, no previous study has investigated the factors t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Quait, Abdulrahman, Doherty, Patrick, Gutacker, Nils, Mills, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28633533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487317717064
_version_ 1783259850572038144
author Al Quait, Abdulrahman
Doherty, Patrick
Gutacker, Nils
Mills, Joseph
author_facet Al Quait, Abdulrahman
Doherty, Patrick
Gutacker, Nils
Mills, Joseph
author_sort Al Quait, Abdulrahman
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Despite the proven benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), utilization rates remain below recommendation in the percutaneous coronary intervention cohort in most European countries. Although extensive research has been carried out on CR uptake, no previous study has investigated the factors that lead patients to attend the initial CR baseline assessment (CR engagement). This paper attempts to provide new insights into CR engagement in the growing percutaneous coronary intervention population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, we analysed data on 59,807 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during 2013 to 2016 (mean age 65 years; 25% female). Twenty factors were hypothesized to have a direct impact on CR engagement and they were grouped into four main categories; namely socio-demographic factors, cardiac risk factors, medical status and service-level factors. A binary logistic regression model was constructed to examine the association between CR engagement and tested factors. All but one of the proposed factors had a statistically significant impact on CR engagement. Results showed that CR engagement decreases by 1.2% per year of age (odds ratio 0.98) and is approximately 7% lower (odds ratio 0.93) in female patients, while patients are 4.4 times more likely to engage if they receive a confirmed joining date (odds ratio 4.4). The final model achieved 86.6% sensitivity and 49.0% specificity with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.755. CONCLUSION: The present results highlight the important factors of the likelihood of CR engagement. This implies that future strategies should focus on factors that are associated with CR engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5574495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55744952017-09-07 In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision? Al Quait, Abdulrahman Doherty, Patrick Gutacker, Nils Mills, Joseph Eur J Prev Cardiol Cardiac Rehabilitation AIMS: Despite the proven benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), utilization rates remain below recommendation in the percutaneous coronary intervention cohort in most European countries. Although extensive research has been carried out on CR uptake, no previous study has investigated the factors that lead patients to attend the initial CR baseline assessment (CR engagement). This paper attempts to provide new insights into CR engagement in the growing percutaneous coronary intervention population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, we analysed data on 59,807 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during 2013 to 2016 (mean age 65 years; 25% female). Twenty factors were hypothesized to have a direct impact on CR engagement and they were grouped into four main categories; namely socio-demographic factors, cardiac risk factors, medical status and service-level factors. A binary logistic regression model was constructed to examine the association between CR engagement and tested factors. All but one of the proposed factors had a statistically significant impact on CR engagement. Results showed that CR engagement decreases by 1.2% per year of age (odds ratio 0.98) and is approximately 7% lower (odds ratio 0.93) in female patients, while patients are 4.4 times more likely to engage if they receive a confirmed joining date (odds ratio 4.4). The final model achieved 86.6% sensitivity and 49.0% specificity with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.755. CONCLUSION: The present results highlight the important factors of the likelihood of CR engagement. This implies that future strategies should focus on factors that are associated with CR engagement. SAGE Publications 2017-06-21 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5574495/ /pubmed/28633533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487317717064 Text en © The European Society of Cardiology 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Cardiac Rehabilitation
Al Quait, Abdulrahman
Doherty, Patrick
Gutacker, Nils
Mills, Joseph
In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
title In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
title_full In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
title_fullStr In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
title_full_unstemmed In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
title_short In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
title_sort in the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?
topic Cardiac Rehabilitation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28633533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487317717064
work_keys_str_mv AT alquaitabdulrahman inthemoderneraofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioniscardiacrehabilitationengagementpurelyapatientoraserviceleveldecision
AT dohertypatrick inthemoderneraofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioniscardiacrehabilitationengagementpurelyapatientoraserviceleveldecision
AT gutackernils inthemoderneraofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioniscardiacrehabilitationengagementpurelyapatientoraserviceleveldecision
AT millsjoseph inthemoderneraofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioniscardiacrehabilitationengagementpurelyapatientoraserviceleveldecision