Cargando…

Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis

INTRODUCTION: The high diagnostic accuracy of plasma metanephrines (PMets) in the diagnosis of Phaeochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (PPGL) is well established. Considerable controversy exists regarding optimum sampling conditions for PMets. The use of reference intervals that do not compromise diagnostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, T.P., Casey, R., Wall, D., Bell, M., O'Shea, P.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28856203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2016.05.001
_version_ 1783259855912435712
author Griffin, T.P.
Casey, R.
Wall, D.
Bell, M.
O'Shea, P.M.
author_facet Griffin, T.P.
Casey, R.
Wall, D.
Bell, M.
O'Shea, P.M.
author_sort Griffin, T.P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The high diagnostic accuracy of plasma metanephrines (PMets) in the diagnosis of Phaeochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (PPGL) is well established. Considerable controversy exists regarding optimum sampling conditions for PMets. The use of reference intervals that do not compromise diagnostic sensitivity is recommended. However, the optimum rest period prior to sampling has yet to be clearly established. The aim of this study was to evaluate PMets concentrations in paired blood samples collected following 30 and 40 min seated-rest prior to sampling, in patients in whom it was clinically reasonable to suspect that PPGL may be present. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study design was used. PMets results from paired blood samples collected after 30 and 40 min seated-rest between January 2009 and June 2015 were recorded. Results were interpreted using reference intervals established in subjects seated and supine. RESULTS: A total of 410 patient results were eligible for analysis. There was no statistical difference between plasma normetanephrine (NMN) or metanephrine (MN) concentrations in samples collected following 30 and 40 min seated-rest in subjects with PPGL (n=11), post-resection of PPGL (n=20) or in whom PPGL was excluded (n=379). Using reference intervals established in the seated position, diagnostic sensitivity was 100% at 30 min and 90.9% at 40 min. Diagnostic specificity was approximately 95% at both time points. When supine reference intervals were used, diagnostic sensitivity was 100% and diagnostic specificity was reduced by ≈22% at both time points. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, we recommend at most 30 min continuous rest prior to sampling for PMets measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5574516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55745162017-08-30 Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis Griffin, T.P. Casey, R. Wall, D. Bell, M. O'Shea, P.M. Pract Lab Med Article INTRODUCTION: The high diagnostic accuracy of plasma metanephrines (PMets) in the diagnosis of Phaeochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (PPGL) is well established. Considerable controversy exists regarding optimum sampling conditions for PMets. The use of reference intervals that do not compromise diagnostic sensitivity is recommended. However, the optimum rest period prior to sampling has yet to be clearly established. The aim of this study was to evaluate PMets concentrations in paired blood samples collected following 30 and 40 min seated-rest prior to sampling, in patients in whom it was clinically reasonable to suspect that PPGL may be present. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study design was used. PMets results from paired blood samples collected after 30 and 40 min seated-rest between January 2009 and June 2015 were recorded. Results were interpreted using reference intervals established in subjects seated and supine. RESULTS: A total of 410 patient results were eligible for analysis. There was no statistical difference between plasma normetanephrine (NMN) or metanephrine (MN) concentrations in samples collected following 30 and 40 min seated-rest in subjects with PPGL (n=11), post-resection of PPGL (n=20) or in whom PPGL was excluded (n=379). Using reference intervals established in the seated position, diagnostic sensitivity was 100% at 30 min and 90.9% at 40 min. Diagnostic specificity was approximately 95% at both time points. When supine reference intervals were used, diagnostic sensitivity was 100% and diagnostic specificity was reduced by ≈22% at both time points. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, we recommend at most 30 min continuous rest prior to sampling for PMets measurement. Elsevier 2016-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5574516/ /pubmed/28856203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2016.05.001 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Griffin, T.P.
Casey, R.
Wall, D.
Bell, M.
O'Shea, P.M.
Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
title Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
title_full Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
title_short Evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
title_sort evaluating the optimum rest period prior to blood collection for fractionated plasma free metanephrines analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28856203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2016.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT griffintp evaluatingtheoptimumrestperiodpriortobloodcollectionforfractionatedplasmafreemetanephrinesanalysis
AT caseyr evaluatingtheoptimumrestperiodpriortobloodcollectionforfractionatedplasmafreemetanephrinesanalysis
AT walld evaluatingtheoptimumrestperiodpriortobloodcollectionforfractionatedplasmafreemetanephrinesanalysis
AT bellm evaluatingtheoptimumrestperiodpriortobloodcollectionforfractionatedplasmafreemetanephrinesanalysis
AT osheapm evaluatingtheoptimumrestperiodpriortobloodcollectionforfractionatedplasmafreemetanephrinesanalysis