Cargando…

The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014

In Canada, measles was eliminated in 1998 and rubella in 2000. Effective measles and rubella surveillance is vital in elimination settings, hinging on reliable laboratory methods. However, low-prevalence settings affect the predictive value of laboratory tests. We conducted an analysis to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolotin, Shelly, Lim, Gillian, Dang, Vica, Crowcroft, Natasha, Gubbay, Jonathan, Mazzulli, Tony, Schabas, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28850604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181172
_version_ 1783259866467401728
author Bolotin, Shelly
Lim, Gillian
Dang, Vica
Crowcroft, Natasha
Gubbay, Jonathan
Mazzulli, Tony
Schabas, Richard
author_facet Bolotin, Shelly
Lim, Gillian
Dang, Vica
Crowcroft, Natasha
Gubbay, Jonathan
Mazzulli, Tony
Schabas, Richard
author_sort Bolotin, Shelly
collection PubMed
description In Canada, measles was eliminated in 1998 and rubella in 2000. Effective measles and rubella surveillance is vital in elimination settings, hinging on reliable laboratory methods. However, low-prevalence settings affect the predictive value of laboratory tests. We conducted an analysis to determine the performance of measles and rubella IgM testing in a jurisdiction where both infections are eliminated. 21,299 test results were extracted from the Public Health Ontario Laboratories database and 1,239 reports were extracted from the Ontario Integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS) from 2008 and 2010 for measles and rubella, respectively, to 2014. Deterministic linkage resulted in 658 linked measles records (2009–2014) and 189 linked rubella records (2010–2014). Sixty-six iPHIS measles entries were classified as confirmed cases, of which 53 linked to laboratory data. Five iPHIS rubella entries were classified as confirmed, all linked to IgM results. The positive predictive value was 17.4% for measles and 3.6% for rubella. Sensitivity was 79.2% for measles and 100.0% for rubella. Specificity was 65.7% for measles and 25.8% for rubella. Our study confirms that a positive IgM alone does not confirm a measles case in elimination settings. This has important implications for countries that are working towards measles and rubella elimination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5574571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55745712017-09-15 The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014 Bolotin, Shelly Lim, Gillian Dang, Vica Crowcroft, Natasha Gubbay, Jonathan Mazzulli, Tony Schabas, Richard PLoS One Research Article In Canada, measles was eliminated in 1998 and rubella in 2000. Effective measles and rubella surveillance is vital in elimination settings, hinging on reliable laboratory methods. However, low-prevalence settings affect the predictive value of laboratory tests. We conducted an analysis to determine the performance of measles and rubella IgM testing in a jurisdiction where both infections are eliminated. 21,299 test results were extracted from the Public Health Ontario Laboratories database and 1,239 reports were extracted from the Ontario Integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS) from 2008 and 2010 for measles and rubella, respectively, to 2014. Deterministic linkage resulted in 658 linked measles records (2009–2014) and 189 linked rubella records (2010–2014). Sixty-six iPHIS measles entries were classified as confirmed cases, of which 53 linked to laboratory data. Five iPHIS rubella entries were classified as confirmed, all linked to IgM results. The positive predictive value was 17.4% for measles and 3.6% for rubella. Sensitivity was 79.2% for measles and 100.0% for rubella. Specificity was 65.7% for measles and 25.8% for rubella. Our study confirms that a positive IgM alone does not confirm a measles case in elimination settings. This has important implications for countries that are working towards measles and rubella elimination. Public Library of Science 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5574571/ /pubmed/28850604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181172 Text en © 2017 Bolotin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bolotin, Shelly
Lim, Gillian
Dang, Vica
Crowcroft, Natasha
Gubbay, Jonathan
Mazzulli, Tony
Schabas, Richard
The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014
title The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014
title_full The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014
title_fullStr The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014
title_full_unstemmed The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014
title_short The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009–2014
title_sort utility of measles and rubella igm serology in an elimination setting, ontario, canada, 2009–2014
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28850604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181172
work_keys_str_mv AT bolotinshelly theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT limgillian theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT dangvica theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT crowcroftnatasha theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT gubbayjonathan theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT mazzullitony theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT schabasrichard theutilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT bolotinshelly utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT limgillian utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT dangvica utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT crowcroftnatasha utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT gubbayjonathan utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT mazzullitony utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014
AT schabasrichard utilityofmeaslesandrubellaigmserologyinaneliminationsettingontariocanada20092014