Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG for detecting cardiac and extra-cardiac thoracic involvement in patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND: (18)F-FDG PET has been used in sarcoidosis for diagnosis and determination of the extent of the disease. However, assessing inflammatory lesions in cardiac sarcoidosis using (18)F-FDG can be challenging because it accumulates physiologically in normal myocardium. Another radiotracer, 3′-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norikane, Takashi, Yamamoto, Yuka, Maeda, Yukito, Noma, Takahisa, Dobashi, Hiroaki, Nishiyama, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0321-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: (18)F-FDG PET has been used in sarcoidosis for diagnosis and determination of the extent of the disease. However, assessing inflammatory lesions in cardiac sarcoidosis using (18)F-FDG can be challenging because it accumulates physiologically in normal myocardium. Another radiotracer, 3′-deoxy-3′-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT), has been investigated as a promising PET tracer for evaluating tumor proliferative activity. In contrast to (18)F-FDG, (18)F-FLT uptake in the normal myocardium is low. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the uptake of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG in the evaluation of cardiac and extra-cardiac thoracic involvement in patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis. Data for 20 patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis were examined. (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies had been performed at 1 h after each radiotracer injection. The patients had fasted for at least 18 h before (18)F-FDG PET/CT but were given no special dietary instructions regarding the period before (18)F-FLT PET/CT. Uptake of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG was examined visually and semiquantitatively using maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS: Two patients had cardiac sarcoidosis, 7 had extra-cardiac thoracic sarcoidosis, and 11 had both cardiac and extra-cardiac thoracic sarcoidosis. On visual analysis for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, 4/20 (18)F-FDG scans were rated as inconclusive because the (18)F-FDG pattern was diffuse, whereas no FLT scans were rated as inconclusive. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis was 85%; specificity, 100%; and accuracy, 90%. The corresponding values for (18)F-FLT PET/CT were 92, 100, and 95%, respectively. Using semiquantitative analysis of cardiac sarcoidosis, the mean (18)F-FDG SUVmax was significantly higher than the mean (18)F-FLT SUVmax (P < 0.005). Both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT PET/CT studies detected all 24 extra-cardiac lesions. Using semiquantitative analysis of extra-cardiac sarcoidosis, the mean (18)F-FDG SUVmax was significantly higher than the mean (18)F-FLT SUVmax (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preliminary study suggest that (18)F-FLT PET/CT can detect cardiac and extra-cardiac thoracic involvement in patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis as well as (18)F-FDG PET/CT, although uptake of (18)F-FLT in lesions was significantly lower than that of (18)F-FDG. However, (18)F-FLT PET/CT may be easier to perform since it requires neither prolonged fasting nor a special diet prior to imaging.