Cargando…
Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize
First principles calculations are performed on Zr(2)AlC and Cr(2)AlC MAX phases to compare their ability to accommodate point defects under irradiation. Interatomic bonding is stronger in Cr(2)AlC than Zr(2)AlC but contrary to expectation Zr(2)AlC exhibits higher vacancy and antisite pair formation...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10273-6 |
_version_ | 1783259925849309184 |
---|---|
author | Shah, S. H. Bristowe, P. D. |
author_facet | Shah, S. H. Bristowe, P. D. |
author_sort | Shah, S. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | First principles calculations are performed on Zr(2)AlC and Cr(2)AlC MAX phases to compare their ability to accommodate point defects under irradiation. Interatomic bonding is stronger in Cr(2)AlC than Zr(2)AlC but contrary to expectation Zr(2)AlC exhibits higher vacancy and antisite pair formation energies. However, interstitials and Frenkel defects are generally more difficult to form in Cr(2)AlC. The results are attributed to the mixed covalent/ionic/metallic nature of the bonding. Detailed comparison of all the energies suggests that the preferred defects in Zr(2)AlC and Cr(2)AlC are the V(Al)+Al(i) Frenkel and Cr(Al)+Al(Cr) antisite respectively. Thus the potential response of the two phases to irradiation is different and taking account of other competing defects it is suggested that Zr(2)AlC is less susceptible to amorphization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5574895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55748952017-09-01 Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize Shah, S. H. Bristowe, P. D. Sci Rep Article First principles calculations are performed on Zr(2)AlC and Cr(2)AlC MAX phases to compare their ability to accommodate point defects under irradiation. Interatomic bonding is stronger in Cr(2)AlC than Zr(2)AlC but contrary to expectation Zr(2)AlC exhibits higher vacancy and antisite pair formation energies. However, interstitials and Frenkel defects are generally more difficult to form in Cr(2)AlC. The results are attributed to the mixed covalent/ionic/metallic nature of the bonding. Detailed comparison of all the energies suggests that the preferred defects in Zr(2)AlC and Cr(2)AlC are the V(Al)+Al(i) Frenkel and Cr(Al)+Al(Cr) antisite respectively. Thus the potential response of the two phases to irradiation is different and taking account of other competing defects it is suggested that Zr(2)AlC is less susceptible to amorphization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5574895/ /pubmed/28852165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10273-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Shah, S. H. Bristowe, P. D. Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
title | Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
title_full | Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
title_fullStr | Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
title_full_unstemmed | Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
title_short | Point defect formation in M(2)AlC (M = Zr,Cr) MAX phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
title_sort | point defect formation in m(2)alc (m = zr,cr) max phases and their tendency to disorder and amorphize |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10273-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahsh pointdefectformationinm2alcmzrcrmaxphasesandtheirtendencytodisorderandamorphize AT bristowepd pointdefectformationinm2alcmzrcrmaxphasesandtheirtendencytodisorderandamorphize |