Cargando…
Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
Successfully inhibiting a prepotent response tendency requires the attentional detection of signals which cue response cancellation. Although neuroimaging studies have identified important roles of stimulus-driven processing in the attentional detection, the effects of top-down control were scarcely...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08807-z |
_version_ | 1783259960614846464 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Xiangfei Wang, Yao Sun, Junfeng Li, Chunbo Tong, Shanbao |
author_facet | Hong, Xiangfei Wang, Yao Sun, Junfeng Li, Chunbo Tong, Shanbao |
author_sort | Hong, Xiangfei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successfully inhibiting a prepotent response tendency requires the attentional detection of signals which cue response cancellation. Although neuroimaging studies have identified important roles of stimulus-driven processing in the attentional detection, the effects of top-down control were scarcely investigated. In this study, scalp EEG was recorded from thirty-two participants during a modified Go/NoGo task, in which a spatial-cueing approach was implemented to manipulate top-down selective attention. We observed classical event-related potential components, including N2 and P3, in the attended condition of response inhibition. While in the ignored condition of response inhibition, a smaller P3 was observed and N2 was absent. The correlation between P3 and CNV during the foreperiod suggested an inhibitory role of P3 in both conditions. Furthermore, source analysis suggested that P3 generation was mainly localized to the midcingulate cortex, and the attended condition showed increased activation relative to the ignored condition in several regions, including inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, insula and uncus, suggesting that these regions were involved in top-down attentional control rather than inhibitory processing. Taken together, by segregating electrophysiological correlates of top-down selective attention from those of response inhibition, our findings provide new insights in understanding the neural mechanisms of response inhibition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5575050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55750502017-09-01 Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study Hong, Xiangfei Wang, Yao Sun, Junfeng Li, Chunbo Tong, Shanbao Sci Rep Article Successfully inhibiting a prepotent response tendency requires the attentional detection of signals which cue response cancellation. Although neuroimaging studies have identified important roles of stimulus-driven processing in the attentional detection, the effects of top-down control were scarcely investigated. In this study, scalp EEG was recorded from thirty-two participants during a modified Go/NoGo task, in which a spatial-cueing approach was implemented to manipulate top-down selective attention. We observed classical event-related potential components, including N2 and P3, in the attended condition of response inhibition. While in the ignored condition of response inhibition, a smaller P3 was observed and N2 was absent. The correlation between P3 and CNV during the foreperiod suggested an inhibitory role of P3 in both conditions. Furthermore, source analysis suggested that P3 generation was mainly localized to the midcingulate cortex, and the attended condition showed increased activation relative to the ignored condition in several regions, including inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, insula and uncus, suggesting that these regions were involved in top-down attentional control rather than inhibitory processing. Taken together, by segregating electrophysiological correlates of top-down selective attention from those of response inhibition, our findings provide new insights in understanding the neural mechanisms of response inhibition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5575050/ /pubmed/28851891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08807-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hong, Xiangfei Wang, Yao Sun, Junfeng Li, Chunbo Tong, Shanbao Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study |
title | Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study |
title_full | Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study |
title_fullStr | Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study |
title_short | Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study |
title_sort | segregating top-down selective attention from response inhibition in a spatial cueing go/nogo task: an erp and source localization study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08807-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongxiangfei segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy AT wangyao segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy AT sunjunfeng segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy AT lichunbo segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy AT tongshanbao segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy |