Cargando…

Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study

Successfully inhibiting a prepotent response tendency requires the attentional detection of signals which cue response cancellation. Although neuroimaging studies have identified important roles of stimulus-driven processing in the attentional detection, the effects of top-down control were scarcely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Xiangfei, Wang, Yao, Sun, Junfeng, Li, Chunbo, Tong, Shanbao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08807-z
_version_ 1783259960614846464
author Hong, Xiangfei
Wang, Yao
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Chunbo
Tong, Shanbao
author_facet Hong, Xiangfei
Wang, Yao
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Chunbo
Tong, Shanbao
author_sort Hong, Xiangfei
collection PubMed
description Successfully inhibiting a prepotent response tendency requires the attentional detection of signals which cue response cancellation. Although neuroimaging studies have identified important roles of stimulus-driven processing in the attentional detection, the effects of top-down control were scarcely investigated. In this study, scalp EEG was recorded from thirty-two participants during a modified Go/NoGo task, in which a spatial-cueing approach was implemented to manipulate top-down selective attention. We observed classical event-related potential components, including N2 and P3, in the attended condition of response inhibition. While in the ignored condition of response inhibition, a smaller P3 was observed and N2 was absent. The correlation between P3 and CNV during the foreperiod suggested an inhibitory role of P3 in both conditions. Furthermore, source analysis suggested that P3 generation was mainly localized to the midcingulate cortex, and the attended condition showed increased activation relative to the ignored condition in several regions, including inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, insula and uncus, suggesting that these regions were involved in top-down attentional control rather than inhibitory processing. Taken together, by segregating electrophysiological correlates of top-down selective attention from those of response inhibition, our findings provide new insights in understanding the neural mechanisms of response inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5575050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55750502017-09-01 Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study Hong, Xiangfei Wang, Yao Sun, Junfeng Li, Chunbo Tong, Shanbao Sci Rep Article Successfully inhibiting a prepotent response tendency requires the attentional detection of signals which cue response cancellation. Although neuroimaging studies have identified important roles of stimulus-driven processing in the attentional detection, the effects of top-down control were scarcely investigated. In this study, scalp EEG was recorded from thirty-two participants during a modified Go/NoGo task, in which a spatial-cueing approach was implemented to manipulate top-down selective attention. We observed classical event-related potential components, including N2 and P3, in the attended condition of response inhibition. While in the ignored condition of response inhibition, a smaller P3 was observed and N2 was absent. The correlation between P3 and CNV during the foreperiod suggested an inhibitory role of P3 in both conditions. Furthermore, source analysis suggested that P3 generation was mainly localized to the midcingulate cortex, and the attended condition showed increased activation relative to the ignored condition in several regions, including inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, insula and uncus, suggesting that these regions were involved in top-down attentional control rather than inhibitory processing. Taken together, by segregating electrophysiological correlates of top-down selective attention from those of response inhibition, our findings provide new insights in understanding the neural mechanisms of response inhibition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5575050/ /pubmed/28851891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08807-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hong, Xiangfei
Wang, Yao
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Chunbo
Tong, Shanbao
Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
title Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
title_full Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
title_fullStr Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
title_full_unstemmed Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
title_short Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study
title_sort segregating top-down selective attention from response inhibition in a spatial cueing go/nogo task: an erp and source localization study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08807-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hongxiangfei segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy
AT wangyao segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy
AT sunjunfeng segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy
AT lichunbo segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy
AT tongshanbao segregatingtopdownselectiveattentionfromresponseinhibitioninaspatialcueinggonogotaskanerpandsourcelocalizationstudy