Cargando…

Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish

No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are expected to benefit fisheries via the net export of eggs and larvae (recruitment subsidy) from reserves to adjacent fished areas. Quantifying egg production is the first step in evaluating recruitment subsidy potential. We calculated annual egg production per unit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, A. B., Davies, C. R., Emslie, M. J., Mapstone, B. D., Russ, G. R., Tobin, A. J., Williams, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10180-w
_version_ 1783260020251557888
author Carter, A. B.
Davies, C. R.
Emslie, M. J.
Mapstone, B. D.
Russ, G. R.
Tobin, A. J.
Williams, A. J.
author_facet Carter, A. B.
Davies, C. R.
Emslie, M. J.
Mapstone, B. D.
Russ, G. R.
Tobin, A. J.
Williams, A. J.
author_sort Carter, A. B.
collection PubMed
description No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are expected to benefit fisheries via the net export of eggs and larvae (recruitment subsidy) from reserves to adjacent fished areas. Quantifying egg production is the first step in evaluating recruitment subsidy potential. We calculated annual egg production per unit area (EPUA) from 2004 to 2013 for the commercially important common coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, on fished and NTMR reefs throughout the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. Geographic region, NTMR status, fish size, and population density were all found to affect EPUA. The interactions among these factors were such that, EPUA on NTMR reefs compared to reefs open to fishing was 21% greater in the southern GBR, 152% greater in the central GBR, but 56% less in the northern GBR. The results show that while NTMRs can potentially provide a substantial recruitment subsidy (central GBR reefs), they may provide a far smaller subsidy (southern GBR), or serve as recruitment sinks (northern GBR) for the same species in nearby locations where demographic rates differ. This study highlights the importance of considering spatial variation in EPUA when assessing locations of NTMRs if recruitment subsidy is expected from them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5575329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55753292017-09-01 Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish Carter, A. B. Davies, C. R. Emslie, M. J. Mapstone, B. D. Russ, G. R. Tobin, A. J. Williams, A. J. Sci Rep Article No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are expected to benefit fisheries via the net export of eggs and larvae (recruitment subsidy) from reserves to adjacent fished areas. Quantifying egg production is the first step in evaluating recruitment subsidy potential. We calculated annual egg production per unit area (EPUA) from 2004 to 2013 for the commercially important common coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, on fished and NTMR reefs throughout the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. Geographic region, NTMR status, fish size, and population density were all found to affect EPUA. The interactions among these factors were such that, EPUA on NTMR reefs compared to reefs open to fishing was 21% greater in the southern GBR, 152% greater in the central GBR, but 56% less in the northern GBR. The results show that while NTMRs can potentially provide a substantial recruitment subsidy (central GBR reefs), they may provide a far smaller subsidy (southern GBR), or serve as recruitment sinks (northern GBR) for the same species in nearby locations where demographic rates differ. This study highlights the importance of considering spatial variation in EPUA when assessing locations of NTMRs if recruitment subsidy is expected from them. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5575329/ /pubmed/28852089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10180-w Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Carter, A. B.
Davies, C. R.
Emslie, M. J.
Mapstone, B. D.
Russ, G. R.
Tobin, A. J.
Williams, A. J.
Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
title Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
title_full Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
title_fullStr Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
title_short Reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
title_sort reproductive benefits of no-take marine reserves vary with region for an exploited coral reef fish
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10180-w
work_keys_str_mv AT carterab reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish
AT daviescr reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish
AT emsliemj reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish
AT mapstonebd reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish
AT russgr reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish
AT tobinaj reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish
AT williamsaj reproductivebenefitsofnotakemarinereservesvarywithregionforanexploitedcoralreeffish