Cargando…

External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection

Early detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) after oesophageal resection for malignancy is crucial. This retrospective study validates a risk score, predicting AL, which includes C-reactive protein, albumin and white cell count in patients undergoing oesophageal resection between 2003 and 2014. For v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paireder, Matthias, Jomrich, Gerd, Asari, Reza, Kristo, Ivan, Gleiss, Andreas, Preusser, Matthias, Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10084-9
_version_ 1783260022387507200
author Paireder, Matthias
Jomrich, Gerd
Asari, Reza
Kristo, Ivan
Gleiss, Andreas
Preusser, Matthias
Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
author_facet Paireder, Matthias
Jomrich, Gerd
Asari, Reza
Kristo, Ivan
Gleiss, Andreas
Preusser, Matthias
Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
author_sort Paireder, Matthias
collection PubMed
description Early detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) after oesophageal resection for malignancy is crucial. This retrospective study validates a risk score, predicting AL, which includes C-reactive protein, albumin and white cell count in patients undergoing oesophageal resection between 2003 and 2014. For validation of the NUn score a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is estimated. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) is reported with 95% confidence interval (CI). Among 258 patients (79.5% male) 32 patients showed signs of anastomotic leakage (12.4%). NUn score in our data has a median of 9.3 (range 6.2–17.6). The odds ratio for AL was 1.31 (CI 1.03–1.67; p = 0.028). AUC for AL was 0.59 (CI 0.47–0.72). Using the original cutoff value of 10, the sensitivity was 45.2% an the specificity was 73.8%. This results in a positive predictive value of 19.4% and a negative predictive value of 90.6%. The proportion of variation in AL occurrence, which is explained by the NUn score, was 2.5% (PEV = 0.025). This study provides evidence for an external validation of a simple risk score for AL after oesophageal resection. In this cohort, the NUn score is not useful due to its poor discrimination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5575338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55753382017-09-01 External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection Paireder, Matthias Jomrich, Gerd Asari, Reza Kristo, Ivan Gleiss, Andreas Preusser, Matthias Schoppmann, Sebastian F. Sci Rep Article Early detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) after oesophageal resection for malignancy is crucial. This retrospective study validates a risk score, predicting AL, which includes C-reactive protein, albumin and white cell count in patients undergoing oesophageal resection between 2003 and 2014. For validation of the NUn score a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is estimated. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) is reported with 95% confidence interval (CI). Among 258 patients (79.5% male) 32 patients showed signs of anastomotic leakage (12.4%). NUn score in our data has a median of 9.3 (range 6.2–17.6). The odds ratio for AL was 1.31 (CI 1.03–1.67; p = 0.028). AUC for AL was 0.59 (CI 0.47–0.72). Using the original cutoff value of 10, the sensitivity was 45.2% an the specificity was 73.8%. This results in a positive predictive value of 19.4% and a negative predictive value of 90.6%. The proportion of variation in AL occurrence, which is explained by the NUn score, was 2.5% (PEV = 0.025). This study provides evidence for an external validation of a simple risk score for AL after oesophageal resection. In this cohort, the NUn score is not useful due to its poor discrimination. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5575338/ /pubmed/28852063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10084-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Paireder, Matthias
Jomrich, Gerd
Asari, Reza
Kristo, Ivan
Gleiss, Andreas
Preusser, Matthias
Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
title External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
title_full External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
title_fullStr External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
title_full_unstemmed External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
title_short External validation of the NUn score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
title_sort external validation of the nun score for predicting anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10084-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pairedermatthias externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection
AT jomrichgerd externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection
AT asarireza externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection
AT kristoivan externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection
AT gleissandreas externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection
AT preussermatthias externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection
AT schoppmannsebastianf externalvalidationofthenunscoreforpredictinganastomoticleakageafteroesophagealresection