Conducting research in clinical psychology practice: Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations

OBJECTIVES: The combination of clinical psychologists’ therapeutic expertise and research training means that they are in an ideal position to be conducting high‐quality research projects. However, despite these skills and the documented benefits of research to services and service users, research activity in practice remains low. This article aims to give an overview of the advantages of, and difficulties in conducting research in clinical practice. METHOD: We reviewed the relevant literature on barriers to research and reflected on our clinical and research experiences in a range of contexts to offer practical recommendations. RESULTS: We considered factors involved in the planning, sourcing support, implementation, and dissemination phases of research, and outline suggestions to improve the feasibility of research projects in post‐qualification roles. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that research leadership is particularly important within clinical psychology to ensure the profession's continued visibility and influence within health settings. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Clinical implications Emerging evidence suggests that clinical settings that foster research are associated with better patient outcomes. Suggestions to increase the feasibility of research projects in clinical settings are detailed. Limitations The present recommendations are drawn from the authors’ practical experience and may need adaptation to individual practitioners’ settings. This study does not attempt to assess the efficacy of the strategies suggested.