Cargando…
Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good
This paper considers the tensions created in genomic research by public and private for-profit ideals. Our intent is to strengthen the public good at a time when doing science is strongly motivated by market possibilities and opportunities. Focusing on the emergence of gene editing, and in particula...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-017-0116-4 |
_version_ | 1783260118334308352 |
---|---|
author | Capps, Benjamin Chadwick, Ruth Joly, Yann Mulvihill, John J. Lysaght, Tamra Zwart, Hub |
author_facet | Capps, Benjamin Chadwick, Ruth Joly, Yann Mulvihill, John J. Lysaght, Tamra Zwart, Hub |
author_sort | Capps, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper considers the tensions created in genomic research by public and private for-profit ideals. Our intent is to strengthen the public good at a time when doing science is strongly motivated by market possibilities and opportunities. Focusing on the emergence of gene editing, and in particular CRISPR, we consider how commercialisation encourages hype and hope—a sense that only promise and idealism can achieve progress. At this rate, genomic research reinforces structures that promote, above all else, private interests, but that may attenuate conditions for the public good of science. In the first part, we situate genomics using the aphorism that ‘on the shoulders of giants we see farther’; these giants are infrastructures and research cultures rather than individual ‘heroes’ of science. In this respect, private initiatives are not the only pivot for successful discovery, and indeed, fascination in those could impinge upon the fundamental role of public-supported discovery. To redress these circumstances, we define the extent to which progress presupposes research strategies that are for the public good. In the second part, we use a ‘falling giant’ narrative to illustrate the risks of over-indulging for-profit initiatives. We therefore offer a counterpoint to commercialised science, using three identifiable ‘giants’—scientists, publics and cultures—to illustrate how the public good contributes to genomic discovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5575847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55758472017-08-30 Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good Capps, Benjamin Chadwick, Ruth Joly, Yann Mulvihill, John J. Lysaght, Tamra Zwart, Hub Hum Genomics Opinion This paper considers the tensions created in genomic research by public and private for-profit ideals. Our intent is to strengthen the public good at a time when doing science is strongly motivated by market possibilities and opportunities. Focusing on the emergence of gene editing, and in particular CRISPR, we consider how commercialisation encourages hype and hope—a sense that only promise and idealism can achieve progress. At this rate, genomic research reinforces structures that promote, above all else, private interests, but that may attenuate conditions for the public good of science. In the first part, we situate genomics using the aphorism that ‘on the shoulders of giants we see farther’; these giants are infrastructures and research cultures rather than individual ‘heroes’ of science. In this respect, private initiatives are not the only pivot for successful discovery, and indeed, fascination in those could impinge upon the fundamental role of public-supported discovery. To redress these circumstances, we define the extent to which progress presupposes research strategies that are for the public good. In the second part, we use a ‘falling giant’ narrative to illustrate the risks of over-indulging for-profit initiatives. We therefore offer a counterpoint to commercialised science, using three identifiable ‘giants’—scientists, publics and cultures—to illustrate how the public good contributes to genomic discovery. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5575847/ /pubmed/28851444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-017-0116-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Capps, Benjamin Chadwick, Ruth Joly, Yann Mulvihill, John J. Lysaght, Tamra Zwart, Hub Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
title | Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
title_full | Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
title_fullStr | Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
title_full_unstemmed | Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
title_short | Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
title_sort | falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-017-0116-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cappsbenjamin fallinggiantsandtheriseofgeneeditingethicsprivateinterestsandthepublicgood AT chadwickruth fallinggiantsandtheriseofgeneeditingethicsprivateinterestsandthepublicgood AT jolyyann fallinggiantsandtheriseofgeneeditingethicsprivateinterestsandthepublicgood AT mulvihilljohnj fallinggiantsandtheriseofgeneeditingethicsprivateinterestsandthepublicgood AT lysaghttamra fallinggiantsandtheriseofgeneeditingethicsprivateinterestsandthepublicgood AT zwarthub fallinggiantsandtheriseofgeneeditingethicsprivateinterestsandthepublicgood |