Cargando…

A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Battersby, Nick J., Dattani, Mit, Rao, Sheela, Cunningham, David, Tait, Diana, Adams, Richard, Moran, Brendan J., Khakoo, Shelize, Tekkis, Paris, Rasheed, Shahnawaz, Mirnezami, Alex, Quirke, Philip, West, Nicholas P., Nagtegaal, Iris, Chong, Irene, Sadanandam, Anguraj, Valeri, Nicola, Thomas, Karen, Frost, Michelle, Brown, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
_version_ 1783260143040856064
author Battersby, Nick J.
Dattani, Mit
Rao, Sheela
Cunningham, David
Tait, Diana
Adams, Richard
Moran, Brendan J.
Khakoo, Shelize
Tekkis, Paris
Rasheed, Shahnawaz
Mirnezami, Alex
Quirke, Philip
West, Nicholas P.
Nagtegaal, Iris
Chong, Irene
Sadanandam, Anguraj
Valeri, Nicola
Thomas, Karen
Frost, Michelle
Brown, Gina
author_facet Battersby, Nick J.
Dattani, Mit
Rao, Sheela
Cunningham, David
Tait, Diana
Adams, Richard
Moran, Brendan J.
Khakoo, Shelize
Tekkis, Paris
Rasheed, Shahnawaz
Mirnezami, Alex
Quirke, Philip
West, Nicholas P.
Nagtegaal, Iris
Chong, Irene
Sadanandam, Anguraj
Valeri, Nicola
Thomas, Karen
Frost, Michelle
Brown, Gina
author_sort Battersby, Nick J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a ‘good’ mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a ‘poor response’ identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. DISCUSSION: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520. Registered on 5 February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5576102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55761022017-08-30 A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Battersby, Nick J. Dattani, Mit Rao, Sheela Cunningham, David Tait, Diana Adams, Richard Moran, Brendan J. Khakoo, Shelize Tekkis, Paris Rasheed, Shahnawaz Mirnezami, Alex Quirke, Philip West, Nicholas P. Nagtegaal, Iris Chong, Irene Sadanandam, Anguraj Valeri, Nicola Thomas, Karen Frost, Michelle Brown, Gina Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a ‘good’ mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a ‘poor response’ identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. DISCUSSION: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520. Registered on 5 February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5576102/ /pubmed/28851403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Battersby, Nick J.
Dattani, Mit
Rao, Sheela
Cunningham, David
Tait, Diana
Adams, Richard
Moran, Brendan J.
Khakoo, Shelize
Tekkis, Paris
Rasheed, Shahnawaz
Mirnezami, Alex
Quirke, Philip
West, Nicholas P.
Nagtegaal, Iris
Chong, Irene
Sadanandam, Anguraj
Valeri, Nicola
Thomas, Karen
Frost, Michelle
Brown, Gina
A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase iii trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrtrg) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (trigger): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
work_keys_str_mv AT battersbynickj arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dattanimit arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT raosheela arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cunninghamdavid arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taitdiana arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adamsrichard arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moranbrendanj arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT khakooshelize arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tekkisparis arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rasheedshahnawaz arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mirnezamialex arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT quirkephilip arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT westnicholasp arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nagtegaaliris arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chongirene arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sadanandamanguraj arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT valerinicola arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomaskaren arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT frostmichelle arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT browngina arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT battersbynickj rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dattanimit rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT raosheela rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cunninghamdavid rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taitdiana rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adamsrichard rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moranbrendanj rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT khakooshelize rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tekkisparis rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rasheedshahnawaz rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mirnezamialex rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT quirkephilip rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT westnicholasp rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nagtegaaliris rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chongirene rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sadanandamanguraj rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT valerinicola rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomaskaren rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT frostmichelle rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT browngina rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial