Cargando…
A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2 |
_version_ | 1783260143040856064 |
---|---|
author | Battersby, Nick J. Dattani, Mit Rao, Sheela Cunningham, David Tait, Diana Adams, Richard Moran, Brendan J. Khakoo, Shelize Tekkis, Paris Rasheed, Shahnawaz Mirnezami, Alex Quirke, Philip West, Nicholas P. Nagtegaal, Iris Chong, Irene Sadanandam, Anguraj Valeri, Nicola Thomas, Karen Frost, Michelle Brown, Gina |
author_facet | Battersby, Nick J. Dattani, Mit Rao, Sheela Cunningham, David Tait, Diana Adams, Richard Moran, Brendan J. Khakoo, Shelize Tekkis, Paris Rasheed, Shahnawaz Mirnezami, Alex Quirke, Philip West, Nicholas P. Nagtegaal, Iris Chong, Irene Sadanandam, Anguraj Valeri, Nicola Thomas, Karen Frost, Michelle Brown, Gina |
author_sort | Battersby, Nick J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a ‘good’ mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a ‘poor response’ identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. DISCUSSION: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520. Registered on 5 February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5576102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55761022017-08-30 A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Battersby, Nick J. Dattani, Mit Rao, Sheela Cunningham, David Tait, Diana Adams, Richard Moran, Brendan J. Khakoo, Shelize Tekkis, Paris Rasheed, Shahnawaz Mirnezami, Alex Quirke, Philip West, Nicholas P. Nagtegaal, Iris Chong, Irene Sadanandam, Anguraj Valeri, Nicola Thomas, Karen Frost, Michelle Brown, Gina Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a ‘good’ mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a ‘poor response’ identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. DISCUSSION: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520. Registered on 5 February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5576102/ /pubmed/28851403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Battersby, Nick J. Dattani, Mit Rao, Sheela Cunningham, David Tait, Diana Adams, Richard Moran, Brendan J. Khakoo, Shelize Tekkis, Paris Rasheed, Shahnawaz Mirnezami, Alex Quirke, Philip West, Nicholas P. Nagtegaal, Iris Chong, Irene Sadanandam, Anguraj Valeri, Nicola Thomas, Karen Frost, Michelle Brown, Gina A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase iii trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrtrg) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (trigger): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT battersbynickj arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dattanimit arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT raosheela arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cunninghamdavid arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taitdiana arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT adamsrichard arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moranbrendanj arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT khakooshelize arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tekkisparis arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rasheedshahnawaz arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mirnezamialex arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT quirkephilip arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT westnicholasp arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nagtegaaliris arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chongirene arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sadanandamanguraj arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT valerinicola arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thomaskaren arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT frostmichelle arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT browngina arectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT battersbynickj rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dattanimit rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT raosheela rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cunninghamdavid rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taitdiana rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT adamsrichard rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moranbrendanj rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT khakooshelize rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tekkisparis rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rasheedshahnawaz rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mirnezamialex rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT quirkephilip rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT westnicholasp rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nagtegaaliris rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chongirene rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sadanandamanguraj rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT valerinicola rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thomaskaren rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT frostmichelle rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT browngina rectalcancerfeasibilitystudywithanembeddedphaseiiitrialdesignassessingmagneticresonancetumourregressiongrademrtrgasanovelbiomarkertostratifymanagementbygoodandpoorresponsetochemoradiotherapytriggerstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |