Cargando…
Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure
BACKGROUND: Reclining wheelchair users often add one or more sitting assistive devices to their wheelchairs, but the effect of these additional sitting assistive devices on the risk of pressure ulcers has rarely been investigated. This study examined the four modes of reclining wheelchair without an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0398-8 |
_version_ | 1783260153885229056 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chun-Ting Huang, Kuo-Yuan Kung, Chien-Feng Chen, Yen-Nien Tseng, Yen-Ting Tsai, Kuen-Horng |
author_facet | Li, Chun-Ting Huang, Kuo-Yuan Kung, Chien-Feng Chen, Yen-Nien Tseng, Yen-Ting Tsai, Kuen-Horng |
author_sort | Li, Chun-Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reclining wheelchair users often add one or more sitting assistive devices to their wheelchairs, but the effect of these additional sitting assistive devices on the risk of pressure ulcers has rarely been investigated. This study examined the four modes of reclining wheelchair without and with different sitting assistive devices, namely the back reclined mode, the lumbar support with back reclined mode, the femur upward with back reclined mode, and the lumbar support with femur upward with back reclined mode, in terms of their effects on human-wheelchair interface pressure. METHODS: This study recruited 16 healthy participants to undergo the aforementioned four modes in random order and have their human-wheelchair interface pressure measured. The initial setting of experimental reclining wheelchair backrest was pushed backward to reach a 150° recline. The data on interface pressure were collected for 5 s while the participant maintained a stable sitting position. The contact area, average pressure, and peak pressure on the back area, ischial area, and femur area were recorded and calculated. RESULTS: Among all tested modes, the lumbar support with femur upward with back reclined mode provided the most significant reduction in stress load on the ischial area (P ≤ 0.010) and shifted part of the load to the femur area (P ≤ 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the effects of and differences between various reclining wheelchair–sitting assistive device combination modes. These findings are useful for the decision-making processes of rehabilitation physicians, wheelchair users, and manufacturers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5576165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55761652017-08-30 Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure Li, Chun-Ting Huang, Kuo-Yuan Kung, Chien-Feng Chen, Yen-Nien Tseng, Yen-Ting Tsai, Kuen-Horng Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Reclining wheelchair users often add one or more sitting assistive devices to their wheelchairs, but the effect of these additional sitting assistive devices on the risk of pressure ulcers has rarely been investigated. This study examined the four modes of reclining wheelchair without and with different sitting assistive devices, namely the back reclined mode, the lumbar support with back reclined mode, the femur upward with back reclined mode, and the lumbar support with femur upward with back reclined mode, in terms of their effects on human-wheelchair interface pressure. METHODS: This study recruited 16 healthy participants to undergo the aforementioned four modes in random order and have their human-wheelchair interface pressure measured. The initial setting of experimental reclining wheelchair backrest was pushed backward to reach a 150° recline. The data on interface pressure were collected for 5 s while the participant maintained a stable sitting position. The contact area, average pressure, and peak pressure on the back area, ischial area, and femur area were recorded and calculated. RESULTS: Among all tested modes, the lumbar support with femur upward with back reclined mode provided the most significant reduction in stress load on the ischial area (P ≤ 0.010) and shifted part of the load to the femur area (P ≤ 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the effects of and differences between various reclining wheelchair–sitting assistive device combination modes. These findings are useful for the decision-making processes of rehabilitation physicians, wheelchair users, and manufacturers. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5576165/ /pubmed/28851369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0398-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Chun-Ting Huang, Kuo-Yuan Kung, Chien-Feng Chen, Yen-Nien Tseng, Yen-Ting Tsai, Kuen-Horng Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
title | Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
title_full | Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
title_short | Evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
title_sort | evaluation of the effect of different sitting assistive devices in reclining wheelchair on interface pressure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0398-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichunting evaluationoftheeffectofdifferentsittingassistivedevicesinrecliningwheelchaironinterfacepressure AT huangkuoyuan evaluationoftheeffectofdifferentsittingassistivedevicesinrecliningwheelchaironinterfacepressure AT kungchienfeng evaluationoftheeffectofdifferentsittingassistivedevicesinrecliningwheelchaironinterfacepressure AT chenyennien evaluationoftheeffectofdifferentsittingassistivedevicesinrecliningwheelchaironinterfacepressure AT tsengyenting evaluationoftheeffectofdifferentsittingassistivedevicesinrecliningwheelchaironinterfacepressure AT tsaikuenhorng evaluationoftheeffectofdifferentsittingassistivedevicesinrecliningwheelchaironinterfacepressure |