Cargando…

REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crystalloid for patients with sepsis and hypotension. However, there is a lack of evidence from clinical trials to support this. Accumulating observational data suggest harm associated with the injudicious...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macdonald, Stephen P. J., Taylor, David McD, Keijzers, Gerben, Arendts, Glenn, Fatovich, Daniel M., Kinnear, Frances B., Brown, Simon G. A., Bellomo, Rinaldo, Burrows, Sally, Fraser, John F., Litton, Edward, Ascencio-Lane, Juan Carlos, Anstey, Matthew, McCutcheon, David, Smart, Lisa, Vlad, Ioana, Winearls, James, Wibrow, Bradley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2137-7
_version_ 1783260172646350848
author Macdonald, Stephen P. J.
Taylor, David McD
Keijzers, Gerben
Arendts, Glenn
Fatovich, Daniel M.
Kinnear, Frances B.
Brown, Simon G. A.
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Burrows, Sally
Fraser, John F.
Litton, Edward
Ascencio-Lane, Juan Carlos
Anstey, Matthew
McCutcheon, David
Smart, Lisa
Vlad, Ioana
Winearls, James
Wibrow, Bradley
author_facet Macdonald, Stephen P. J.
Taylor, David McD
Keijzers, Gerben
Arendts, Glenn
Fatovich, Daniel M.
Kinnear, Frances B.
Brown, Simon G. A.
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Burrows, Sally
Fraser, John F.
Litton, Edward
Ascencio-Lane, Juan Carlos
Anstey, Matthew
McCutcheon, David
Smart, Lisa
Vlad, Ioana
Winearls, James
Wibrow, Bradley
author_sort Macdonald, Stephen P. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crystalloid for patients with sepsis and hypotension. However, there is a lack of evidence from clinical trials to support this. Accumulating observational data suggest harm associated with the injudicious use of fluids in sepsis. There is currently equipoise regarding liberal or restricted fluid-volume resuscitation as first-line treatment for sepsis-related hypotension. A randomised trial comparing these two approaches is, therefore, justified. METHODS/DESIGN: The REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension trial (REFRESH) is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase II clinical feasibility trial. Participants will be patients presenting to the emergency departments of Australian metropolitan hospitals with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure of < 100 mmHg, persisting after a 1000-ml fluid bolus with isotonic crystalloid. Participants will be randomised to either a second 1000-ml fluid bolus (standard care) or maintenance rate fluid only, with the early commencement of a vasopressor infusion to maintain a mean arterial pressure of > 65 mmHg, if required (restricted fluid). All will receive further protocolised fluid boluses (500 ml or 250 ml, respectively), if required during the 6-h study period. The primary outcome measure is total volume administered in the first 6 h. Secondary outcomes include fluid volume at 24 h, organ support ‘free days’ to day 28, 90-day mortality, and a range of feasibility and process-of-care measures. Participants will also undergo serial measurement, over the first 24 h, of biomarkers of inflammation, endothelial cell activation and glycocalyx degradation for comparison between the groups. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised trial examining fluid volume for initial resuscitation in septic shock in an industrialised country. A pragmatic, open-label design will establish the feasibility of undertaking a large, international, multicentre trial with sufficient power to assess clinical outcomes. The embedded biomarker study aims to provide mechanistic plausibility for a larger trial by defining the effects of fluid volume on markers of systemic inflammation and the vascular endothelium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTRN12616000006448. Registered on 12 January 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2137-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5576288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55762882017-08-30 REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial Macdonald, Stephen P. J. Taylor, David McD Keijzers, Gerben Arendts, Glenn Fatovich, Daniel M. Kinnear, Frances B. Brown, Simon G. A. Bellomo, Rinaldo Burrows, Sally Fraser, John F. Litton, Edward Ascencio-Lane, Juan Carlos Anstey, Matthew McCutcheon, David Smart, Lisa Vlad, Ioana Winearls, James Wibrow, Bradley Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crystalloid for patients with sepsis and hypotension. However, there is a lack of evidence from clinical trials to support this. Accumulating observational data suggest harm associated with the injudicious use of fluids in sepsis. There is currently equipoise regarding liberal or restricted fluid-volume resuscitation as first-line treatment for sepsis-related hypotension. A randomised trial comparing these two approaches is, therefore, justified. METHODS/DESIGN: The REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension trial (REFRESH) is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase II clinical feasibility trial. Participants will be patients presenting to the emergency departments of Australian metropolitan hospitals with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure of < 100 mmHg, persisting after a 1000-ml fluid bolus with isotonic crystalloid. Participants will be randomised to either a second 1000-ml fluid bolus (standard care) or maintenance rate fluid only, with the early commencement of a vasopressor infusion to maintain a mean arterial pressure of > 65 mmHg, if required (restricted fluid). All will receive further protocolised fluid boluses (500 ml or 250 ml, respectively), if required during the 6-h study period. The primary outcome measure is total volume administered in the first 6 h. Secondary outcomes include fluid volume at 24 h, organ support ‘free days’ to day 28, 90-day mortality, and a range of feasibility and process-of-care measures. Participants will also undergo serial measurement, over the first 24 h, of biomarkers of inflammation, endothelial cell activation and glycocalyx degradation for comparison between the groups. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised trial examining fluid volume for initial resuscitation in septic shock in an industrialised country. A pragmatic, open-label design will establish the feasibility of undertaking a large, international, multicentre trial with sufficient power to assess clinical outcomes. The embedded biomarker study aims to provide mechanistic plausibility for a larger trial by defining the effects of fluid volume on markers of systemic inflammation and the vascular endothelium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTRN12616000006448. Registered on 12 January 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2137-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5576288/ /pubmed/28851407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2137-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Macdonald, Stephen P. J.
Taylor, David McD
Keijzers, Gerben
Arendts, Glenn
Fatovich, Daniel M.
Kinnear, Frances B.
Brown, Simon G. A.
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Burrows, Sally
Fraser, John F.
Litton, Edward
Ascencio-Lane, Juan Carlos
Anstey, Matthew
McCutcheon, David
Smart, Lisa
Vlad, Ioana
Winearls, James
Wibrow, Bradley
REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort restricted fluid resuscitation in sepsis-associated hypotension (refresh): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2137-7
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaldstephenpj restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taylordavidmcd restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keijzersgerben restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT arendtsglenn restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fatovichdanielm restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kinnearfrancesb restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownsimonga restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bellomorinaldo restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burrowssally restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fraserjohnf restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT littonedward restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ascenciolanejuancarlos restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ansteymatthew restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccutcheondavid restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smartlisa restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vladioana restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT winearlsjames restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wibrowbradley restrictedfluidresuscitationinsepsisassociatedhypotensionrefreshstudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial