Cargando…

eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are associated with a range of adverse outcomes and represent a large global burden to individuals and health care systems. Prevention programs are an important way to avert a proportion of the burden associated with such conditions both at a clinical and subclinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deady, M., Choi, I., Calvo, R. A., Glozier, N., Christensen, H., Harvey, S. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1473-1
_version_ 1783260176951803904
author Deady, M.
Choi, I.
Calvo, R. A.
Glozier, N.
Christensen, H.
Harvey, S. B.
author_facet Deady, M.
Choi, I.
Calvo, R. A.
Glozier, N.
Christensen, H.
Harvey, S. B.
author_sort Deady, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are associated with a range of adverse outcomes and represent a large global burden to individuals and health care systems. Prevention programs are an important way to avert a proportion of the burden associated with such conditions both at a clinical and subclinical level. eHealth interventions provide an opportunity to offer accessible, acceptable, easily disseminated globally low-cost interventions on a wide scale. However, the efficacy of these programs remains unclear. The aim of this study is to review and evaluate the effects of eHealth prevention interventions for anxiety and depression. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted on four relevant databases to identify randomized controlled trials of eHealth interventions aimed at the prevention of anxiety and depression in the general population published between 2000 and January 2016. The quality of studies was assessed and a meta-analysis was performed using pooled effect size estimates obtained from a random effects model. RESULTS: Ten trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies were of sufficient quality and utilized cognitive behavioural techniques. At post-treatment, the overall mean difference between the intervention and control groups was 0.25 (95% confidence internal: 0.09, 0.41; p = 0.003) for depression outcome studies and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.52; p = 0.004) for anxiety outcome studies, indicating a small but positive effect of the eHealth interventions. The effect sizes for universal and indicated/selective interventions were similar (0.29 and 0.25 respectively). However, there was inadequate evidence to suggest that such interventions have an effect on long-term disorder incidence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that eHealth prevention interventions for anxiety and depression are associated with small but positive effects on symptom reduction. However, there is inadequate evidence on the medium to long-term effect of such interventions, and importantly, on the reduction of incidence of disorders. Further work to explore the impact of eHealth psychological interventions on long-term incidence rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5576307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55763072017-08-30 eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis Deady, M. Choi, I. Calvo, R. A. Glozier, N. Christensen, H. Harvey, S. B. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are associated with a range of adverse outcomes and represent a large global burden to individuals and health care systems. Prevention programs are an important way to avert a proportion of the burden associated with such conditions both at a clinical and subclinical level. eHealth interventions provide an opportunity to offer accessible, acceptable, easily disseminated globally low-cost interventions on a wide scale. However, the efficacy of these programs remains unclear. The aim of this study is to review and evaluate the effects of eHealth prevention interventions for anxiety and depression. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted on four relevant databases to identify randomized controlled trials of eHealth interventions aimed at the prevention of anxiety and depression in the general population published between 2000 and January 2016. The quality of studies was assessed and a meta-analysis was performed using pooled effect size estimates obtained from a random effects model. RESULTS: Ten trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies were of sufficient quality and utilized cognitive behavioural techniques. At post-treatment, the overall mean difference between the intervention and control groups was 0.25 (95% confidence internal: 0.09, 0.41; p = 0.003) for depression outcome studies and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.52; p = 0.004) for anxiety outcome studies, indicating a small but positive effect of the eHealth interventions. The effect sizes for universal and indicated/selective interventions were similar (0.29 and 0.25 respectively). However, there was inadequate evidence to suggest that such interventions have an effect on long-term disorder incidence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that eHealth prevention interventions for anxiety and depression are associated with small but positive effects on symptom reduction. However, there is inadequate evidence on the medium to long-term effect of such interventions, and importantly, on the reduction of incidence of disorders. Further work to explore the impact of eHealth psychological interventions on long-term incidence rates. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5576307/ /pubmed/28851342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1473-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deady, M.
Choi, I.
Calvo, R. A.
Glozier, N.
Christensen, H.
Harvey, S. B.
eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ehealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1473-1
work_keys_str_mv AT deadym ehealthinterventionsforthepreventionofdepressionandanxietyinthegeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT choii ehealthinterventionsforthepreventionofdepressionandanxietyinthegeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT calvora ehealthinterventionsforthepreventionofdepressionandanxietyinthegeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gloziern ehealthinterventionsforthepreventionofdepressionandanxietyinthegeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT christensenh ehealthinterventionsforthepreventionofdepressionandanxietyinthegeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harveysb ehealthinterventionsforthepreventionofdepressionandanxietyinthegeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis