Cargando…

Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers

BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density is a well-established, strong breast cancer risk factor but the biology underlying this association remains unclear. Breast density may reflect underlying alterations in the size and activity of the breast stem cell pool. We examined, for the first time, assoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaghjyan, Lusine, Stoll, Ethan, Ghosh, Karthik, Scott, Christopher G., Jensen, Matthew R., Brandt, Kathleen R., Visscher, Daniel, Vachon, Celine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0889-3
_version_ 1783260179385548800
author Yaghjyan, Lusine
Stoll, Ethan
Ghosh, Karthik
Scott, Christopher G.
Jensen, Matthew R.
Brandt, Kathleen R.
Visscher, Daniel
Vachon, Celine M.
author_facet Yaghjyan, Lusine
Stoll, Ethan
Ghosh, Karthik
Scott, Christopher G.
Jensen, Matthew R.
Brandt, Kathleen R.
Visscher, Daniel
Vachon, Celine M.
author_sort Yaghjyan, Lusine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density is a well-established, strong breast cancer risk factor but the biology underlying this association remains unclear. Breast density may reflect underlying alterations in the size and activity of the breast stem cell pool. We examined, for the first time, associations of CD44, CD24, and aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A1 (ALDH1A1) breast stem cell markers with breast density. METHODS: We included in this study 64 asymptomatic healthy women who previously volunteered for a unique biopsy study of normal breast tissue at the Mayo Clinic (2006-2008). Mammographically identified dense and non-dense areas were confirmed/localized by ultrasound and biopsied. Immunohistochemical analysis of the markers was performed according to a standard protocol and the staining was assessed by a single blinded pathologist. In core biopsy samples retrieved from areas of high vs. low density within the same woman, we compared staining extent and an expression score (the product of staining intensity and extent), using the signed rank test. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 64, 28, and 10 women were available for CD44, CD24, and ALDH1A1 staining, respectively. For all three markers, we found higher levels of staining extent in dense as compared to non-dense tissue, though for CD24 and ALDH1A1 the difference did not reach statistical significance (CD44, 6.3% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001; CD24, 8.0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.10; and ALDH1A1, 0.5% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.12). The expression score for CD44 was significantly greater in dense as compared to non-dense tissue (9.8 vs.3.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an increased presence and/or activity of stem cells in dense as compared to non-dense breast tissue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0889-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5576318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55763182017-08-31 Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers Yaghjyan, Lusine Stoll, Ethan Ghosh, Karthik Scott, Christopher G. Jensen, Matthew R. Brandt, Kathleen R. Visscher, Daniel Vachon, Celine M. Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density is a well-established, strong breast cancer risk factor but the biology underlying this association remains unclear. Breast density may reflect underlying alterations in the size and activity of the breast stem cell pool. We examined, for the first time, associations of CD44, CD24, and aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A1 (ALDH1A1) breast stem cell markers with breast density. METHODS: We included in this study 64 asymptomatic healthy women who previously volunteered for a unique biopsy study of normal breast tissue at the Mayo Clinic (2006-2008). Mammographically identified dense and non-dense areas were confirmed/localized by ultrasound and biopsied. Immunohistochemical analysis of the markers was performed according to a standard protocol and the staining was assessed by a single blinded pathologist. In core biopsy samples retrieved from areas of high vs. low density within the same woman, we compared staining extent and an expression score (the product of staining intensity and extent), using the signed rank test. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 64, 28, and 10 women were available for CD44, CD24, and ALDH1A1 staining, respectively. For all three markers, we found higher levels of staining extent in dense as compared to non-dense tissue, though for CD24 and ALDH1A1 the difference did not reach statistical significance (CD44, 6.3% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001; CD24, 8.0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.10; and ALDH1A1, 0.5% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.12). The expression score for CD44 was significantly greater in dense as compared to non-dense tissue (9.8 vs.3.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an increased presence and/or activity of stem cells in dense as compared to non-dense breast tissue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0889-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5576318/ /pubmed/28851411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0889-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yaghjyan, Lusine
Stoll, Ethan
Ghosh, Karthik
Scott, Christopher G.
Jensen, Matthew R.
Brandt, Kathleen R.
Visscher, Daniel
Vachon, Celine M.
Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
title Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
title_full Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
title_fullStr Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
title_full_unstemmed Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
title_short Tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
title_sort tissue-based associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell markers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0889-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yaghjyanlusine tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT stollethan tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT ghoshkarthik tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT scottchristopherg tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT jensenmatthewr tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT brandtkathleenr tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT visscherdaniel tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers
AT vachoncelinem tissuebasedassociationsofmammographicbreastdensitywithbreaststemcellmarkers