Cargando…

The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease

BACKGROUND: The PD COMM trial is a phase III multi-centre randomised controlled trial whose aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two approaches to speech and language therapy (SLT) compared with no SLT intervention (control) for people with Parkinson’s disease who have self...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masterson-Algar, Patricia, Burton, Christopher R., Brady, Marian C., Nicoll, Avril, Clarke, Carl E., Rick, Caroline, Hughes, Max, Au, Pui, Smith, Christina H., Sackley, Catherine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2130-1
_version_ 1783260187698659328
author Masterson-Algar, Patricia
Burton, Christopher R.
Brady, Marian C.
Nicoll, Avril
Clarke, Carl E.
Rick, Caroline
Hughes, Max
Au, Pui
Smith, Christina H.
Sackley, Catherine M.
author_facet Masterson-Algar, Patricia
Burton, Christopher R.
Brady, Marian C.
Nicoll, Avril
Clarke, Carl E.
Rick, Caroline
Hughes, Max
Au, Pui
Smith, Christina H.
Sackley, Catherine M.
author_sort Masterson-Algar, Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The PD COMM trial is a phase III multi-centre randomised controlled trial whose aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two approaches to speech and language therapy (SLT) compared with no SLT intervention (control) for people with Parkinson’s disease who have self-reported or carer-reported problems with their speech or voice. Our protocol describes the process evaluation embedded within the outcome evaluation whose aim is to evaluate what happened at the time of the PD COMM intervention implementation and to provide findings that will assist in the interpretation of the PD COMM trial results. Furthermore, the aim of the PD COMM process evaluation is to investigate intervention complexity within a theoretical model of how the trialled interventions might work best and why. METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing from the Normalization Process Theory and frameworks for implementation fidelity, a mixed method design will be used to address process evaluation research questions. Therapists’ and participants’ perceptions and experiences will be investigated via in-depth interviews. Critical incident reports, baseline survey data from therapists, treatment record forms and home practice diaries also will be collected at relevant time points throughout the running of the PD COMM trial. Process evaluation data will be analysed independently of the outcome evaluation before the two sets of data are then combined. DISCUSSION: To date, there are a limited number of published process evaluation protocols, and few are linked to trials investigating rehabilitation therapies. Providing a strong theoretical framework underpinning design choices and being tailored to meet the complex characteristics of the trialled interventions, our process evaluation has the potential to provide valuable insight into which components of the interventions being delivered in PD COMM worked best (and what did not), how they worked well and why. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN12421382. Registered on 18 April 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2130-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5576370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55763702017-08-31 The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease Masterson-Algar, Patricia Burton, Christopher R. Brady, Marian C. Nicoll, Avril Clarke, Carl E. Rick, Caroline Hughes, Max Au, Pui Smith, Christina H. Sackley, Catherine M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The PD COMM trial is a phase III multi-centre randomised controlled trial whose aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two approaches to speech and language therapy (SLT) compared with no SLT intervention (control) for people with Parkinson’s disease who have self-reported or carer-reported problems with their speech or voice. Our protocol describes the process evaluation embedded within the outcome evaluation whose aim is to evaluate what happened at the time of the PD COMM intervention implementation and to provide findings that will assist in the interpretation of the PD COMM trial results. Furthermore, the aim of the PD COMM process evaluation is to investigate intervention complexity within a theoretical model of how the trialled interventions might work best and why. METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing from the Normalization Process Theory and frameworks for implementation fidelity, a mixed method design will be used to address process evaluation research questions. Therapists’ and participants’ perceptions and experiences will be investigated via in-depth interviews. Critical incident reports, baseline survey data from therapists, treatment record forms and home practice diaries also will be collected at relevant time points throughout the running of the PD COMM trial. Process evaluation data will be analysed independently of the outcome evaluation before the two sets of data are then combined. DISCUSSION: To date, there are a limited number of published process evaluation protocols, and few are linked to trials investigating rehabilitation therapies. Providing a strong theoretical framework underpinning design choices and being tailored to meet the complex characteristics of the trialled interventions, our process evaluation has the potential to provide valuable insight into which components of the interventions being delivered in PD COMM worked best (and what did not), how they worked well and why. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN12421382. Registered on 18 April 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2130-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5576370/ /pubmed/28851443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2130-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Masterson-Algar, Patricia
Burton, Christopher R.
Brady, Marian C.
Nicoll, Avril
Clarke, Carl E.
Rick, Caroline
Hughes, Max
Au, Pui
Smith, Christina H.
Sackley, Catherine M.
The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease
title The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease
title_full The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease
title_short The PD COMM trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease
title_sort pd comm trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of slt for people with parkinson’s disease
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2130-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mastersonalgarpatricia thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT burtonchristopherr thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT bradymarianc thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT nicollavril thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT clarkecarle thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT rickcaroline thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT hughesmax thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT aupui thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT smithchristinah thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT sackleycatherinem thepdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT mastersonalgarpatricia pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT burtonchristopherr pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT bradymarianc pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT nicollavril pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT clarkecarle pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT rickcaroline pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT hughesmax pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT aupui pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT smithchristinah pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT sackleycatherinem pdcommtrialaprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialassessingtheeffectivenessoftwotypesofsltforpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease