Cargando…
Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation
BACKGROUND: This research focused on the effects of low electric current (μE)-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis infected human root dentin. METHODS: Extracted human canine roots were instrumented, sterilized, and experimentally contaminated with E. faecalis. Af...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183895 |
_version_ | 1783260231876214784 |
---|---|
author | Maden, Murat Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, Ekim Onur Erik, Cevat Emre Yetiş, Ceylan Çağıl Tuncer, Yasin Kahriman, Mesud |
author_facet | Maden, Murat Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, Ekim Onur Erik, Cevat Emre Yetiş, Ceylan Çağıl Tuncer, Yasin Kahriman, Mesud |
author_sort | Maden, Murat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This research focused on the effects of low electric current (μE)-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis infected human root dentin. METHODS: Extracted human canine roots were instrumented, sterilized, and experimentally contaminated with E. faecalis. After incubation for 21 days, the presence of the biofilm was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (n = 3). Roots were randomly divided into seven groups according to decontamination procedures: G1: no treatment; G2: sterile saline; G3: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite; G4: passive ultrasonic irrigation; G5: EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) agitation (EA); G6: μE agitation; and G7: μE-assisted sonic agitation. Fixed μE amperage and intensities were applied in G6 and G7. Following microbial sampling, bacterial colonies were counted using the direct plating method. RESULTS: Biofilm was not eradicated in any sample. The μE-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest cfu values (p<0.05), whereas there were no significant differences among the passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator and μE agitation alone (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, the following conclusions were drawn: The μE-assisted sonic agitation increased the antibiofilm efficiency of sodium hypochlorite than passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoActivator. The μE-assisted sonic agitation on 5.25% sodium hypochlorite is not capable to eradicate biofilms at 10mA energy level in 60s. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5576683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55766832017-09-15 Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation Maden, Murat Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, Ekim Onur Erik, Cevat Emre Yetiş, Ceylan Çağıl Tuncer, Yasin Kahriman, Mesud PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: This research focused on the effects of low electric current (μE)-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis infected human root dentin. METHODS: Extracted human canine roots were instrumented, sterilized, and experimentally contaminated with E. faecalis. After incubation for 21 days, the presence of the biofilm was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (n = 3). Roots were randomly divided into seven groups according to decontamination procedures: G1: no treatment; G2: sterile saline; G3: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite; G4: passive ultrasonic irrigation; G5: EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) agitation (EA); G6: μE agitation; and G7: μE-assisted sonic agitation. Fixed μE amperage and intensities were applied in G6 and G7. Following microbial sampling, bacterial colonies were counted using the direct plating method. RESULTS: Biofilm was not eradicated in any sample. The μE-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest cfu values (p<0.05), whereas there were no significant differences among the passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator and μE agitation alone (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, the following conclusions were drawn: The μE-assisted sonic agitation increased the antibiofilm efficiency of sodium hypochlorite than passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoActivator. The μE-assisted sonic agitation on 5.25% sodium hypochlorite is not capable to eradicate biofilms at 10mA energy level in 60s. Public Library of Science 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5576683/ /pubmed/28854274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183895 Text en © 2017 Maden et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maden, Murat Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, Ekim Onur Erik, Cevat Emre Yetiş, Ceylan Çağıl Tuncer, Yasin Kahriman, Mesud Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
title | Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
title_full | Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
title_fullStr | Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
title_short | Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
title_sort | enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madenmurat enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation AT ertugrulihsanfurkan enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation AT orhanekimonur enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation AT erikcevatemre enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation AT yetisceylancagıl enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation AT tunceryasin enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation AT kahrimanmesud enhancingantibacterialeffectofsodiumhypochloritebylowelectriccurrentassistedsonicagitation |