Cargando…
First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care
PURPOSE: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief family screener, identifying families at universal or elevated risk for psychosocial problems. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and usability of the electronic PAT (ePAT) in pediatric cancer care. METHODS: Eighty-six parents of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3719-3 |
_version_ | 1783260272126853120 |
---|---|
author | Schepers, Sasja A. Sint Nicolaas, Simone M. Maurice-Stam, Heleen van Dijk-Lokkart, Elisabeth M. van den Bergh, Esther M. M. de Boer, Nienke Verhaak, Chris M. Grootenhuis, Martha A. |
author_facet | Schepers, Sasja A. Sint Nicolaas, Simone M. Maurice-Stam, Heleen van Dijk-Lokkart, Elisabeth M. van den Bergh, Esther M. M. de Boer, Nienke Verhaak, Chris M. Grootenhuis, Martha A. |
author_sort | Schepers, Sasja A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief family screener, identifying families at universal or elevated risk for psychosocial problems. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and usability of the electronic PAT (ePAT) in pediatric cancer care. METHODS: Eighty-six parents of newly diagnosed children with cancer (0–18 years) agreed to participate and registered at the website www.hetklikt.nu (58%). Seventy-five families completed the ePAT at approximately 1 month post-diagnosis. Answers were transformed into an electronic PROfile (PAT ePROfile) and fed back to the psychosocial team. Team members completed a semi-structured evaluation questionnaire. Feasibility was measured as the percentage of website registrations, completed ePATs, and PAT ePROfiles reviewed or discussed by the team. Usability included perceived match of the PAT ePROfile with the team’s own risk estimation, perceived added value, and perceived actions undertaken as a result of the PAT ePROfile. RESULTS: Feasibility was 70% for website registration, 87% for completed ePATs, 85% for PAT ePROfile reviewing, and 67% for ePROfile discussion. Team members reported that the PAT ePROfile matched with their own risk estimation (M = 7.92, SD = 1.88) and did not provide additional information (M = 2.18, SD = 2.30). According to the team, actions were undertaken for 25% of the families as a result of the PAT ePROfile. More actions were undertaken for families with elevated risk scores compared to universal risk scores (p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ePAT seems generally feasible, but it is not always clear how this screener adds to current clinical practice. Strategies should be developed together with team members to improve quick exchange of ePAT results and allocate care according to the needs of the families. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5577050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55770502017-09-18 First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care Schepers, Sasja A. Sint Nicolaas, Simone M. Maurice-Stam, Heleen van Dijk-Lokkart, Elisabeth M. van den Bergh, Esther M. M. de Boer, Nienke Verhaak, Chris M. Grootenhuis, Martha A. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief family screener, identifying families at universal or elevated risk for psychosocial problems. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and usability of the electronic PAT (ePAT) in pediatric cancer care. METHODS: Eighty-six parents of newly diagnosed children with cancer (0–18 years) agreed to participate and registered at the website www.hetklikt.nu (58%). Seventy-five families completed the ePAT at approximately 1 month post-diagnosis. Answers were transformed into an electronic PROfile (PAT ePROfile) and fed back to the psychosocial team. Team members completed a semi-structured evaluation questionnaire. Feasibility was measured as the percentage of website registrations, completed ePATs, and PAT ePROfiles reviewed or discussed by the team. Usability included perceived match of the PAT ePROfile with the team’s own risk estimation, perceived added value, and perceived actions undertaken as a result of the PAT ePROfile. RESULTS: Feasibility was 70% for website registration, 87% for completed ePATs, 85% for PAT ePROfile reviewing, and 67% for ePROfile discussion. Team members reported that the PAT ePROfile matched with their own risk estimation (M = 7.92, SD = 1.88) and did not provide additional information (M = 2.18, SD = 2.30). According to the team, actions were undertaken for 25% of the families as a result of the PAT ePROfile. More actions were undertaken for families with elevated risk scores compared to universal risk scores (p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ePAT seems generally feasible, but it is not always clear how this screener adds to current clinical practice. Strategies should be developed together with team members to improve quick exchange of ePAT results and allocate care according to the needs of the families. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-11 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5577050/ /pubmed/28497388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3719-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schepers, Sasja A. Sint Nicolaas, Simone M. Maurice-Stam, Heleen van Dijk-Lokkart, Elisabeth M. van den Bergh, Esther M. M. de Boer, Nienke Verhaak, Chris M. Grootenhuis, Martha A. First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care |
title | First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care |
title_full | First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care |
title_fullStr | First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care |
title_full_unstemmed | First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care |
title_short | First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care |
title_sort | first experience with electronic feedback of the psychosocial assessment tool in pediatric cancer care |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3719-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scheperssasjaa firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT sintnicolaassimonem firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT mauricestamheleen firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT vandijklokkartelisabethm firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT vandenberghesthermm firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT deboernienke firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT verhaakchrism firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare AT grootenhuismarthaa firstexperiencewithelectronicfeedbackofthepsychosocialassessmenttoolinpediatriccancercare |