Cargando…

Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK

Introduction: For people living with HIV, the first antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimen offers the best chance for a good virological response. Early identification of those unlikely to respond to first-line ART could enable timely intervention and increase chances of a good initial treatment res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brima, Nataliya, Lampe, Fiona C., Copas, Andrew, Gilson, Richard, Williams, Ian, Johnson, Margaret A., Phillips, Andrew N., Smith, Colette J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853518
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.21567
_version_ 1783260391220969472
author Brima, Nataliya
Lampe, Fiona C.
Copas, Andrew
Gilson, Richard
Williams, Ian
Johnson, Margaret A.
Phillips, Andrew N.
Smith, Colette J.
author_facet Brima, Nataliya
Lampe, Fiona C.
Copas, Andrew
Gilson, Richard
Williams, Ian
Johnson, Margaret A.
Phillips, Andrew N.
Smith, Colette J.
author_sort Brima, Nataliya
collection PubMed
description Introduction: For people living with HIV, the first antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimen offers the best chance for a good virological response. Early identification of those unlikely to respond to first-line ART could enable timely intervention and increase chances of a good initial treatment response. In this study we assess the extent to which the HIV RNA viral load (VL) at 1 and 3 months is predictive of first-line treatment outcome at 6 months. Methods: All previously ART-naive individuals starting ART at two London centres since 2000 with baseline (−180 to 3 days) VL >500 c/mL had a VL measurement between 6 and 12 months after starting ART, and at least one at month 1 (4–60 days) or month 3 (61–120 days) were included. Lack of treatment response was defined as (i) VL >200 copies/mL at 6 months or (ii) VL >200 copies/mL at 6 months or simultaneous switch in drugs from at least two different drug classes before 6 months. The association with VL measurements at 1 and 3 months post-ART; change from pre-ART in these values; and CD4 count measurements at 1 and 3 months were assessed using logistic regression models. The relative fit of the models was compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results: A total of 198 out of 3258 individuals (6%) experienced lack of treatment response at 6 months (definition i), increasing to 511 (16%) for definition (ii). Those with a 1-month (day 4–60 window) VL of <1000, 1000–9999, 10,000–99,999 and >100,000 copies/ml had a 4%, 8%, 23% and 24% chance, respectively, of subsequently experiencing treatment non-response at 6 months (definition (i)). When considering the 3-month (day 61–120 window) VL, the chances of subsequently experiencing treatment non-response were, respectively, 3%, 25%, 67% and 75%. Results were similar for definition (ii). Conclusions: Whilst 3-month VL provides good discrimination between low and high risk of treatment failure, 1-month VL does not. Presence of a VL >10,000 copies/ml after 3 months of ART is a cutoff above which individuals are at a sufficiently higher risk of non-response that they may be considered for intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5577691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55776912017-09-06 Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK Brima, Nataliya Lampe, Fiona C. Copas, Andrew Gilson, Richard Williams, Ian Johnson, Margaret A. Phillips, Andrew N. Smith, Colette J. J Int AIDS Soc Short Report Introduction: For people living with HIV, the first antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimen offers the best chance for a good virological response. Early identification of those unlikely to respond to first-line ART could enable timely intervention and increase chances of a good initial treatment response. In this study we assess the extent to which the HIV RNA viral load (VL) at 1 and 3 months is predictive of first-line treatment outcome at 6 months. Methods: All previously ART-naive individuals starting ART at two London centres since 2000 with baseline (−180 to 3 days) VL >500 c/mL had a VL measurement between 6 and 12 months after starting ART, and at least one at month 1 (4–60 days) or month 3 (61–120 days) were included. Lack of treatment response was defined as (i) VL >200 copies/mL at 6 months or (ii) VL >200 copies/mL at 6 months or simultaneous switch in drugs from at least two different drug classes before 6 months. The association with VL measurements at 1 and 3 months post-ART; change from pre-ART in these values; and CD4 count measurements at 1 and 3 months were assessed using logistic regression models. The relative fit of the models was compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results: A total of 198 out of 3258 individuals (6%) experienced lack of treatment response at 6 months (definition i), increasing to 511 (16%) for definition (ii). Those with a 1-month (day 4–60 window) VL of <1000, 1000–9999, 10,000–99,999 and >100,000 copies/ml had a 4%, 8%, 23% and 24% chance, respectively, of subsequently experiencing treatment non-response at 6 months (definition (i)). When considering the 3-month (day 61–120 window) VL, the chances of subsequently experiencing treatment non-response were, respectively, 3%, 25%, 67% and 75%. Results were similar for definition (ii). Conclusions: Whilst 3-month VL provides good discrimination between low and high risk of treatment failure, 1-month VL does not. Presence of a VL >10,000 copies/ml after 3 months of ART is a cutoff above which individuals are at a sufficiently higher risk of non-response that they may be considered for intervention. Taylor & Francis 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5577691/ /pubmed/28853518 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.21567 Text en © 2017 Brima N et al; licensee International AIDS Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Brima, Nataliya
Lampe, Fiona C.
Copas, Andrew
Gilson, Richard
Williams, Ian
Johnson, Margaret A.
Phillips, Andrew N.
Smith, Colette J.
Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK
title Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK
title_full Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK
title_fullStr Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK
title_full_unstemmed Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK
title_short Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK
title_sort early virological response to hiv treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? results from an observational cohort study, london, uk
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853518
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.21567
work_keys_str_mv AT brimanataliya earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT lampefionac earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT copasandrew earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT gilsonrichard earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT williamsian earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT johnsonmargareta earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT phillipsandrewn earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk
AT smithcolettej earlyvirologicalresponsetohivtreatmentcanwepredictwhoislikelytoexperiencesubsequenttreatmentfailureresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudylondonuk