Cargando…
A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Accumulation of problems in physical, psychological, cognitive, or social functioning is characteristic for frail individuals. Using a four-domain approach of frailty, this study explored how sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, life events and health are associated with frailty. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0 |
_version_ | 1783260424506966016 |
---|---|
author | van Oostrom, Sandra H van der A, Daphne L Rietman, M Liset Picavet, H Susan J Lette, Manon Verschuren, W M Monique de Bruin, Simone R Spijkerman, Annemieke M W |
author_facet | van Oostrom, Sandra H van der A, Daphne L Rietman, M Liset Picavet, H Susan J Lette, Manon Verschuren, W M Monique de Bruin, Simone R Spijkerman, Annemieke M W |
author_sort | van Oostrom, Sandra H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accumulation of problems in physical, psychological, cognitive, or social functioning is characteristic for frail individuals. Using a four-domain approach of frailty, this study explored how sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, life events and health are associated with frailty. METHODS: The study sample included 4019 men and women (aged 40–81 years) examined during the fifth round (2008–2012) of the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Four domains of frailty were considered: physical (≥4 of 8 criteria: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, strength, perceived health, walking, balance, hearing and vision impairments), psychological (2 criteria: depressive symptoms, mental health), cognitive (<10th percentile on global cognitive functioning), and social frailty (≥2 of 3 criteria: loneliness, social support, social participation). Logistic regression was used to study the cross-sectional association of sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, life events and chronic diseases with frailty domains. RESULTS: About 17% of the population was frail on one or more domains. Overlap between the frailty domains was limited since 82% of the frail population was frail on one domain only. Low educated respondents were at higher risk of being psychologically and socially frail. Having multiple diseases was associated with a higher risk of being physically and psychologically frail. Being physically active was consistently associated with a lower risk of frailty on each of the four domains. Short or long sleep duration was associated with a higher risk of being physically, psychologically, and socially frail. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors, lifestyle and multimorbidity contributed differently to the four frailty domains. It is important to consider multiple frailty domains since this helps to identify different groups of frail people, and as such to provide tailored care and support. Lifestyle factors including physical activity, smoking and sleep duration were associated with multiple domains of frailty. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5577839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55778392017-08-31 A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study van Oostrom, Sandra H van der A, Daphne L Rietman, M Liset Picavet, H Susan J Lette, Manon Verschuren, W M Monique de Bruin, Simone R Spijkerman, Annemieke M W BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Accumulation of problems in physical, psychological, cognitive, or social functioning is characteristic for frail individuals. Using a four-domain approach of frailty, this study explored how sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, life events and health are associated with frailty. METHODS: The study sample included 4019 men and women (aged 40–81 years) examined during the fifth round (2008–2012) of the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Four domains of frailty were considered: physical (≥4 of 8 criteria: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, strength, perceived health, walking, balance, hearing and vision impairments), psychological (2 criteria: depressive symptoms, mental health), cognitive (<10th percentile on global cognitive functioning), and social frailty (≥2 of 3 criteria: loneliness, social support, social participation). Logistic regression was used to study the cross-sectional association of sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, life events and chronic diseases with frailty domains. RESULTS: About 17% of the population was frail on one or more domains. Overlap between the frailty domains was limited since 82% of the frail population was frail on one domain only. Low educated respondents were at higher risk of being psychologically and socially frail. Having multiple diseases was associated with a higher risk of being physically and psychologically frail. Being physically active was consistently associated with a lower risk of frailty on each of the four domains. Short or long sleep duration was associated with a higher risk of being physically, psychologically, and socially frail. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors, lifestyle and multimorbidity contributed differently to the four frailty domains. It is important to consider multiple frailty domains since this helps to identify different groups of frail people, and as such to provide tailored care and support. Lifestyle factors including physical activity, smoking and sleep duration were associated with multiple domains of frailty. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5577839/ /pubmed/28854882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Oostrom, Sandra H van der A, Daphne L Rietman, M Liset Picavet, H Susan J Lette, Manon Verschuren, W M Monique de Bruin, Simone R Spijkerman, Annemieke M W A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study |
title | A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study |
title_full | A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study |
title_short | A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study |
title_sort | four-domain approach of frailty explored in the doetinchem cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanoostromsandrah afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT vanderadaphnel afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT rietmanmliset afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT picavethsusanj afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT lettemanon afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT verschurenwmmonique afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT debruinsimoner afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT spijkermanannemiekemw afourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT vanoostromsandrah fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT vanderadaphnel fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT rietmanmliset fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT picavethsusanj fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT lettemanon fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT verschurenwmmonique fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT debruinsimoner fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy AT spijkermanannemiekemw fourdomainapproachoffrailtyexploredinthedoetinchemcohortstudy |