Cargando…

Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation

BACKGROUND: Two recent recommendations made by the World Health Organization confirm the benefits of companion of choice at birth on labour outcomes; however institutional practices and policies do not always support its implementation in different settings around the world. We conducted a review to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar, Portela, Anayda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9
_version_ 1783260424738701312
author Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar
Portela, Anayda
author_facet Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar
Portela, Anayda
author_sort Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two recent recommendations made by the World Health Organization confirm the benefits of companion of choice at birth on labour outcomes; however institutional practices and policies do not always support its implementation in different settings around the world. We conducted a review to determine factors that affect implementation of this intervention considering the perspectives and experiences of different stakeholders and other institutional, systemic barriers and facilitators. METHODS: Forty one published studies were included in this review. Thirty one publications were identified from a 2013 Cochrane review on the effectiveness of companion of choice at birth. We also reviewed 10 qualitative studies conducted alongside the trials or other interventions on labour and birth companionship identified through electronic searches. The SURE (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence) framework was used to guide the thematic analysis of implementation factors. RESULTS: Women and their families expressed appreciation for the continuous presence of a person to provide support during childbirth. Health care providers were concerned about the role of the companion and possible interference with activities in the labour ward. Allocation of resources, organization of care, facility-related constraints and cultural inclinations were identified as implementation barriers. CONCLUSION: Prior to introducing companion of choice at birth, understanding providers’ attitudes and sensitizing them to the evidence is necessary. The commitment of the management of health care facilities is also required to change policies, including allocation of appropriate physical space that respects women’s privacy. Implementation research to develop models for different contexts which could be scaled up would be useful, including documentation of factors that affected implementation and how they were addressed. Future research should also focus on documenting the costs related to implementation, and on measuring the impact of companion of choice at birth on care-seeking behavior for subsequent births.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5577840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55778402017-08-31 Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar Portela, Anayda BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Two recent recommendations made by the World Health Organization confirm the benefits of companion of choice at birth on labour outcomes; however institutional practices and policies do not always support its implementation in different settings around the world. We conducted a review to determine factors that affect implementation of this intervention considering the perspectives and experiences of different stakeholders and other institutional, systemic barriers and facilitators. METHODS: Forty one published studies were included in this review. Thirty one publications were identified from a 2013 Cochrane review on the effectiveness of companion of choice at birth. We also reviewed 10 qualitative studies conducted alongside the trials or other interventions on labour and birth companionship identified through electronic searches. The SURE (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence) framework was used to guide the thematic analysis of implementation factors. RESULTS: Women and their families expressed appreciation for the continuous presence of a person to provide support during childbirth. Health care providers were concerned about the role of the companion and possible interference with activities in the labour ward. Allocation of resources, organization of care, facility-related constraints and cultural inclinations were identified as implementation barriers. CONCLUSION: Prior to introducing companion of choice at birth, understanding providers’ attitudes and sensitizing them to the evidence is necessary. The commitment of the management of health care facilities is also required to change policies, including allocation of appropriate physical space that respects women’s privacy. Implementation research to develop models for different contexts which could be scaled up would be useful, including documentation of factors that affected implementation and how they were addressed. Future research should also focus on documenting the costs related to implementation, and on measuring the impact of companion of choice at birth on care-seeking behavior for subsequent births. BioMed Central 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5577840/ /pubmed/28854903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar
Portela, Anayda
Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
title Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
title_full Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
title_fullStr Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
title_full_unstemmed Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
title_short Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
title_sort companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kabakiankhasholiantamar companionofchoiceatbirthfactorsaffectingimplementation
AT portelaanayda companionofchoiceatbirthfactorsaffectingimplementation