Cargando…
Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
When immersed in a new environment, we are challenged to decipher initially incomprehensible streams of sensory information. However, quite rapidly, the brain finds structure and meaning in these incoming signals, helping us to predict and prepare ourselves for future actions. This skill relies on e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0144-17.2017 |
_version_ | 1783260427224875008 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Rui Shen, Yuan Tino, Peter Welchman, Andrew E. Kourtzi, Zoe |
author_facet | Wang, Rui Shen, Yuan Tino, Peter Welchman, Andrew E. Kourtzi, Zoe |
author_sort | Wang, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | When immersed in a new environment, we are challenged to decipher initially incomprehensible streams of sensory information. However, quite rapidly, the brain finds structure and meaning in these incoming signals, helping us to predict and prepare ourselves for future actions. This skill relies on extracting the statistics of event streams in the environment that contain regularities of variable complexity from simple repetitive patterns to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we test the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to the environment's statistics and predict upcoming events. By combining behavioral training and multisession fMRI in human participants (male and female), we track the corticostriatal mechanisms that mediate learning of temporal sequences as they change in structure complexity. We show that learning of predictive structures relates to individual decision strategy; that is, selecting the most probable outcome in a given context (maximizing) versus matching the exact sequence statistics. These strategies engage distinct human brain regions: maximizing engages dorsolateral prefrontal, cingulate, sensory–motor regions, and basal ganglia (dorsal caudate, putamen), whereas matching engages occipitotemporal regions (including the hippocampus) and basal ganglia (ventral caudate). Our findings provide evidence for distinct corticostriatal mechanisms that facilitate our ability to extract behaviorally relevant statistics to make predictions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Making predictions about future events relies on interpreting streams of information that may initially appear incomprehensible. Past work has studied how humans identify repetitive patterns and associative pairings. However, the natural environment contains regularities that vary in complexity from simple repetition to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we combine behavior and multisession fMRI to track the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to changes in the environment's statistics. We provide evidence for an alternate route for learning complex temporal statistics: extracting the most probable outcome in a given context is implemented by interactions between executive and motor corticostriatal mechanisms compared with visual corticostriatal circuits (including hippocampal cortex) that support learning of the exact temporal statistics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5577855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55778552017-09-15 Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms Wang, Rui Shen, Yuan Tino, Peter Welchman, Andrew E. Kourtzi, Zoe J Neurosci Research Articles When immersed in a new environment, we are challenged to decipher initially incomprehensible streams of sensory information. However, quite rapidly, the brain finds structure and meaning in these incoming signals, helping us to predict and prepare ourselves for future actions. This skill relies on extracting the statistics of event streams in the environment that contain regularities of variable complexity from simple repetitive patterns to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we test the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to the environment's statistics and predict upcoming events. By combining behavioral training and multisession fMRI in human participants (male and female), we track the corticostriatal mechanisms that mediate learning of temporal sequences as they change in structure complexity. We show that learning of predictive structures relates to individual decision strategy; that is, selecting the most probable outcome in a given context (maximizing) versus matching the exact sequence statistics. These strategies engage distinct human brain regions: maximizing engages dorsolateral prefrontal, cingulate, sensory–motor regions, and basal ganglia (dorsal caudate, putamen), whereas matching engages occipitotemporal regions (including the hippocampus) and basal ganglia (ventral caudate). Our findings provide evidence for distinct corticostriatal mechanisms that facilitate our ability to extract behaviorally relevant statistics to make predictions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Making predictions about future events relies on interpreting streams of information that may initially appear incomprehensible. Past work has studied how humans identify repetitive patterns and associative pairings. However, the natural environment contains regularities that vary in complexity from simple repetition to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we combine behavior and multisession fMRI to track the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to changes in the environment's statistics. We provide evidence for an alternate route for learning complex temporal statistics: extracting the most probable outcome in a given context is implemented by interactions between executive and motor corticostriatal mechanisms compared with visual corticostriatal circuits (including hippocampal cortex) that support learning of the exact temporal statistics. Society for Neuroscience 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5577855/ /pubmed/28760866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0144-17.2017 Text en Copyright © 2017 Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Wang, Rui Shen, Yuan Tino, Peter Welchman, Andrew E. Kourtzi, Zoe Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms |
title | Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms |
title_full | Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms |
title_fullStr | Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms |
title_short | Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms |
title_sort | learning predictive statistics: strategies and brain mechanisms |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0144-17.2017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangrui learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms AT shenyuan learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms AT tinopeter learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms AT welchmanandrewe learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms AT kourtzizoe learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms |