Cargando…

Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms

When immersed in a new environment, we are challenged to decipher initially incomprehensible streams of sensory information. However, quite rapidly, the brain finds structure and meaning in these incoming signals, helping us to predict and prepare ourselves for future actions. This skill relies on e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Rui, Shen, Yuan, Tino, Peter, Welchman, Andrew E., Kourtzi, Zoe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0144-17.2017
_version_ 1783260427224875008
author Wang, Rui
Shen, Yuan
Tino, Peter
Welchman, Andrew E.
Kourtzi, Zoe
author_facet Wang, Rui
Shen, Yuan
Tino, Peter
Welchman, Andrew E.
Kourtzi, Zoe
author_sort Wang, Rui
collection PubMed
description When immersed in a new environment, we are challenged to decipher initially incomprehensible streams of sensory information. However, quite rapidly, the brain finds structure and meaning in these incoming signals, helping us to predict and prepare ourselves for future actions. This skill relies on extracting the statistics of event streams in the environment that contain regularities of variable complexity from simple repetitive patterns to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we test the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to the environment's statistics and predict upcoming events. By combining behavioral training and multisession fMRI in human participants (male and female), we track the corticostriatal mechanisms that mediate learning of temporal sequences as they change in structure complexity. We show that learning of predictive structures relates to individual decision strategy; that is, selecting the most probable outcome in a given context (maximizing) versus matching the exact sequence statistics. These strategies engage distinct human brain regions: maximizing engages dorsolateral prefrontal, cingulate, sensory–motor regions, and basal ganglia (dorsal caudate, putamen), whereas matching engages occipitotemporal regions (including the hippocampus) and basal ganglia (ventral caudate). Our findings provide evidence for distinct corticostriatal mechanisms that facilitate our ability to extract behaviorally relevant statistics to make predictions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Making predictions about future events relies on interpreting streams of information that may initially appear incomprehensible. Past work has studied how humans identify repetitive patterns and associative pairings. However, the natural environment contains regularities that vary in complexity from simple repetition to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we combine behavior and multisession fMRI to track the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to changes in the environment's statistics. We provide evidence for an alternate route for learning complex temporal statistics: extracting the most probable outcome in a given context is implemented by interactions between executive and motor corticostriatal mechanisms compared with visual corticostriatal circuits (including hippocampal cortex) that support learning of the exact temporal statistics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5577855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55778552017-09-15 Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms Wang, Rui Shen, Yuan Tino, Peter Welchman, Andrew E. Kourtzi, Zoe J Neurosci Research Articles When immersed in a new environment, we are challenged to decipher initially incomprehensible streams of sensory information. However, quite rapidly, the brain finds structure and meaning in these incoming signals, helping us to predict and prepare ourselves for future actions. This skill relies on extracting the statistics of event streams in the environment that contain regularities of variable complexity from simple repetitive patterns to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we test the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to the environment's statistics and predict upcoming events. By combining behavioral training and multisession fMRI in human participants (male and female), we track the corticostriatal mechanisms that mediate learning of temporal sequences as they change in structure complexity. We show that learning of predictive structures relates to individual decision strategy; that is, selecting the most probable outcome in a given context (maximizing) versus matching the exact sequence statistics. These strategies engage distinct human brain regions: maximizing engages dorsolateral prefrontal, cingulate, sensory–motor regions, and basal ganglia (dorsal caudate, putamen), whereas matching engages occipitotemporal regions (including the hippocampus) and basal ganglia (ventral caudate). Our findings provide evidence for distinct corticostriatal mechanisms that facilitate our ability to extract behaviorally relevant statistics to make predictions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Making predictions about future events relies on interpreting streams of information that may initially appear incomprehensible. Past work has studied how humans identify repetitive patterns and associative pairings. However, the natural environment contains regularities that vary in complexity from simple repetition to complex probabilistic combinations. Here, we combine behavior and multisession fMRI to track the brain mechanisms that mediate our ability to adapt to changes in the environment's statistics. We provide evidence for an alternate route for learning complex temporal statistics: extracting the most probable outcome in a given context is implemented by interactions between executive and motor corticostriatal mechanisms compared with visual corticostriatal circuits (including hippocampal cortex) that support learning of the exact temporal statistics. Society for Neuroscience 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5577855/ /pubmed/28760866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0144-17.2017 Text en Copyright © 2017 Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wang, Rui
Shen, Yuan
Tino, Peter
Welchman, Andrew E.
Kourtzi, Zoe
Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
title Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
title_full Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
title_fullStr Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
title_short Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms
title_sort learning predictive statistics: strategies and brain mechanisms
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0144-17.2017
work_keys_str_mv AT wangrui learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms
AT shenyuan learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms
AT tinopeter learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms
AT welchmanandrewe learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms
AT kourtzizoe learningpredictivestatisticsstrategiesandbrainmechanisms