Cargando…

Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol

INTRODUCTION: Glenohumeral (shoulder) dislocations are the most common large joint dislocations seen in the emergency department (ED). They cause pain, often severe, and require timely interventions to minimise discomfort and tissue damage. Commonly used reposition or relocation techniques often inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baden, David N, Roetman, Martijn H, Boeije, Tom, Roodheuvel, Floris, Mullaart-Jansen, Nieke, Peeters, Suzanne, Burg, Mike D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013676
_version_ 1783260436867579904
author Baden, David N
Roetman, Martijn H
Boeije, Tom
Roodheuvel, Floris
Mullaart-Jansen, Nieke
Peeters, Suzanne
Burg, Mike D
author_facet Baden, David N
Roetman, Martijn H
Boeije, Tom
Roodheuvel, Floris
Mullaart-Jansen, Nieke
Peeters, Suzanne
Burg, Mike D
author_sort Baden, David N
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Glenohumeral (shoulder) dislocations are the most common large joint dislocations seen in the emergency department (ED). They cause pain, often severe, and require timely interventions to minimise discomfort and tissue damage. Commonly used reposition or relocation techniques often involve traction and/or leverage. These techniques have high success rates but may be painful and time consuming. They may also cause complications. Recently, other techniques—the biomechanical reposition techniques (BRTs)—have become more popular since they may cause less pain, require less time and cause fewer complications. To our knowledge, no research exists comparing the various BRTs. Our objective is to establish which BRT or BRT combination is fastest, least painful and associated with the lowest complication rate for adult ED patients with anterior glenohumeral dislocations (AGDs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adults presenting to the participating EDs with isolated AGDs, as determined by radiographs, will be randomised to one of three BRTs: Cunningham, modified Milch or scapular manipulation. Main study parameters/endpoints are ED length of stay and patients’ self-report of pain. Secondary study parameters/endpoints are procedure times, need for analgesic and/or sedative medications, iatrogenic complications and rates of successful reduction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Non-biomechanical AGD repositioning techniques based on traction and/or leverage are inherently painful and potentially harmful. We believe that the three BRTs used in this study are more physiological, more patient friendly, less likely to cause pain, more time efficient and less likely to produce complications. By comparing these three techniques, we hope to improve the care provided to adults with acute AGDs by reducing their ED length of stay and minimising pain and procedure-related complications. We also hope to define which of the three BRTs is quickest, most likely to be successful and least likely to require sedative or analgesic medications to achieve reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5839.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5577902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55779022017-09-08 Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol Baden, David N Roetman, Martijn H Boeije, Tom Roodheuvel, Floris Mullaart-Jansen, Nieke Peeters, Suzanne Burg, Mike D BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Glenohumeral (shoulder) dislocations are the most common large joint dislocations seen in the emergency department (ED). They cause pain, often severe, and require timely interventions to minimise discomfort and tissue damage. Commonly used reposition or relocation techniques often involve traction and/or leverage. These techniques have high success rates but may be painful and time consuming. They may also cause complications. Recently, other techniques—the biomechanical reposition techniques (BRTs)—have become more popular since they may cause less pain, require less time and cause fewer complications. To our knowledge, no research exists comparing the various BRTs. Our objective is to establish which BRT or BRT combination is fastest, least painful and associated with the lowest complication rate for adult ED patients with anterior glenohumeral dislocations (AGDs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adults presenting to the participating EDs with isolated AGDs, as determined by radiographs, will be randomised to one of three BRTs: Cunningham, modified Milch or scapular manipulation. Main study parameters/endpoints are ED length of stay and patients’ self-report of pain. Secondary study parameters/endpoints are procedure times, need for analgesic and/or sedative medications, iatrogenic complications and rates of successful reduction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Non-biomechanical AGD repositioning techniques based on traction and/or leverage are inherently painful and potentially harmful. We believe that the three BRTs used in this study are more physiological, more patient friendly, less likely to cause pain, more time efficient and less likely to produce complications. By comparing these three techniques, we hope to improve the care provided to adults with acute AGDs by reducing their ED length of stay and minimising pain and procedure-related complications. We also hope to define which of the three BRTs is quickest, most likely to be successful and least likely to require sedative or analgesic medications to achieve reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5839. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5577902/ /pubmed/28729305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013676 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Baden, David N
Roetman, Martijn H
Boeije, Tom
Roodheuvel, Floris
Mullaart-Jansen, Nieke
Peeters, Suzanne
Burg, Mike D
Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol
title Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol
title_full Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol
title_fullStr Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol
title_short Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the BRASD-trial protocol
title_sort biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial— the brasd-trial protocol
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013676
work_keys_str_mv AT badendavidn biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol
AT roetmanmartijnh biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol
AT boeijetom biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol
AT roodheuvelfloris biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol
AT mullaartjansennieke biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol
AT peeterssuzanne biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol
AT burgmiked biomechanicalrepositiontechniquesinanteriorshoulderdislocationarandomisedmulticentreclinicaltrialthebrasdtrialprotocol