Cargando…
Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not
The ability of Baboons (papio papio) to distinguish between English words and nonwords has been modeled using a deep learning convolutional network model that simulates a ventral pathway in which lexical representations of different granularity develop. However, given that pigeons (columba livia), w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183876 |
_version_ | 1783260541549019136 |
---|---|
author | Linke, Maja Bröker, Franziska Ramscar, Michael Baayen, Harald |
author_facet | Linke, Maja Bröker, Franziska Ramscar, Michael Baayen, Harald |
author_sort | Linke, Maja |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability of Baboons (papio papio) to distinguish between English words and nonwords has been modeled using a deep learning convolutional network model that simulates a ventral pathway in which lexical representations of different granularity develop. However, given that pigeons (columba livia), whose brain morphology is drastically different, can also be trained to distinguish between English words and nonwords, it appears that a less species-specific learning algorithm may be required to explain this behavior. Accordingly, we examined whether the learning model of Rescorla and Wagner, which has proved to be amazingly fruitful in understanding animal and human learning could account for these data. We show that a discrimination learning network using gradient orientation features as input units and word and nonword units as outputs succeeds in predicting baboon lexical decision behavior—including key lexical similarity effects and the ups and downs in accuracy as learning unfolds—with surprising precision. The models performance, in which words are not explicitly represented, is remarkable because it is usually assumed that lexicality decisions, including the decisions made by baboons and pigeons, are mediated by explicit lexical representations. By contrast, our results suggest that in learning to perform lexical decision tasks, baboons and pigeons do not construct a hierarchy of lexical units. Rather, they make optimal use of low-level information obtained through the massively parallel processing of gradient orientation features. Accordingly, we suggest that reading in humans first involves initially learning a high-level system building on letter representations acquired from explicit instruction in literacy, which is then integrated into a conventionalized oral communication system, and that like the latter, fluent reading involves the massively parallel processing of the low-level features encoding semantic contrasts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5578497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55784972017-09-15 Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not Linke, Maja Bröker, Franziska Ramscar, Michael Baayen, Harald PLoS One Research Article The ability of Baboons (papio papio) to distinguish between English words and nonwords has been modeled using a deep learning convolutional network model that simulates a ventral pathway in which lexical representations of different granularity develop. However, given that pigeons (columba livia), whose brain morphology is drastically different, can also be trained to distinguish between English words and nonwords, it appears that a less species-specific learning algorithm may be required to explain this behavior. Accordingly, we examined whether the learning model of Rescorla and Wagner, which has proved to be amazingly fruitful in understanding animal and human learning could account for these data. We show that a discrimination learning network using gradient orientation features as input units and word and nonword units as outputs succeeds in predicting baboon lexical decision behavior—including key lexical similarity effects and the ups and downs in accuracy as learning unfolds—with surprising precision. The models performance, in which words are not explicitly represented, is remarkable because it is usually assumed that lexicality decisions, including the decisions made by baboons and pigeons, are mediated by explicit lexical representations. By contrast, our results suggest that in learning to perform lexical decision tasks, baboons and pigeons do not construct a hierarchy of lexical units. Rather, they make optimal use of low-level information obtained through the massively parallel processing of gradient orientation features. Accordingly, we suggest that reading in humans first involves initially learning a high-level system building on letter representations acquired from explicit instruction in literacy, which is then integrated into a conventionalized oral communication system, and that like the latter, fluent reading involves the massively parallel processing of the low-level features encoding semantic contrasts. Public Library of Science 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5578497/ /pubmed/28859134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183876 Text en © 2017 Linke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Linke, Maja Bröker, Franziska Ramscar, Michael Baayen, Harald Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not |
title | Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not |
title_full | Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not |
title_fullStr | Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not |
title_full_unstemmed | Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not |
title_short | Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not |
title_sort | are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? probably not |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linkemaja arebaboonslearningorthographicrepresentationsprobablynot AT brokerfranziska arebaboonslearningorthographicrepresentationsprobablynot AT ramscarmichael arebaboonslearningorthographicrepresentationsprobablynot AT baayenharald arebaboonslearningorthographicrepresentationsprobablynot |