Cargando…

Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management

Introduction  The penis eventually needs specific cutaneous coverage in the context of reconstructive procedures following trauma or congenital anomalies. Local flaps are the first choice but are not always available after multiple previous procedures. In these cases, skin graft and dermal matrices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Triana Junco, Paloma, Dore, Mariela, Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa, Jimenez Gomez, Javier, Miguel Ferrero, Miriam, Díaz González, Mercedes, Lopez-Pereira, Pedro, Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606282
_version_ 1783260590461943808
author Triana Junco, Paloma
Dore, Mariela
Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa
Jimenez Gomez, Javier
Miguel Ferrero, Miriam
Díaz González, Mercedes
Lopez-Pereira, Pedro
Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos
author_facet Triana Junco, Paloma
Dore, Mariela
Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa
Jimenez Gomez, Javier
Miguel Ferrero, Miriam
Díaz González, Mercedes
Lopez-Pereira, Pedro
Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos
author_sort Triana Junco, Paloma
collection PubMed
description Introduction  The penis eventually needs specific cutaneous coverage in the context of reconstructive procedures following trauma or congenital anomalies. Local flaps are the first choice but are not always available after multiple previous procedures. In these cases, skin graft and dermal matrices should be considered. Materials and Methods  This study was a retrospective review of the past 4 years of four patients with severe loss of penile shaft skin who underwent skin reconstruction. Dermal matrices and skin grafts were utilized. Dermal matrices were placed for a median of 4.5 weeks (3.0–6.0 weeks). The skin graft was harvested from the inner thigh region for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and the inguinal region for full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). Results  The four patients presented with complete loss of skin in the penile shaft. One patient had a vesical exstrophy, one had a buried penis with only one corpus cavernosum, one had a wide congenital lymphedema of the genitalia, and one had a lack of skin following circumcision at home. They underwent reconstruction with three patients undergoing split-thickness skin graft; two dermal matrices; and one full-thickness graft, respectively, thereby achieving a good cosmetic and functional result. There were no complications, and all the patients successfully accepted the graft. Conclusion  Dermal matrices and skin grafts may serve as effective tools in the management of severe penile skin defects unable to be covered with local flaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5578817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55788172017-09-01 Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management Triana Junco, Paloma Dore, Mariela Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa Jimenez Gomez, Javier Miguel Ferrero, Miriam Díaz González, Mercedes Lopez-Pereira, Pedro Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos European J Pediatr Surg Rep Introduction  The penis eventually needs specific cutaneous coverage in the context of reconstructive procedures following trauma or congenital anomalies. Local flaps are the first choice but are not always available after multiple previous procedures. In these cases, skin graft and dermal matrices should be considered. Materials and Methods  This study was a retrospective review of the past 4 years of four patients with severe loss of penile shaft skin who underwent skin reconstruction. Dermal matrices and skin grafts were utilized. Dermal matrices were placed for a median of 4.5 weeks (3.0–6.0 weeks). The skin graft was harvested from the inner thigh region for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and the inguinal region for full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). Results  The four patients presented with complete loss of skin in the penile shaft. One patient had a vesical exstrophy, one had a buried penis with only one corpus cavernosum, one had a wide congenital lymphedema of the genitalia, and one had a lack of skin following circumcision at home. They underwent reconstruction with three patients undergoing split-thickness skin graft; two dermal matrices; and one full-thickness graft, respectively, thereby achieving a good cosmetic and functional result. There were no complications, and all the patients successfully accepted the graft. Conclusion  Dermal matrices and skin grafts may serve as effective tools in the management of severe penile skin defects unable to be covered with local flaps. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-01 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5578817/ /pubmed/28868232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606282 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Triana Junco, Paloma
Dore, Mariela
Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa
Jimenez Gomez, Javier
Miguel Ferrero, Miriam
Díaz González, Mercedes
Lopez-Pereira, Pedro
Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos
Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
title Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
title_full Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
title_fullStr Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
title_full_unstemmed Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
title_short Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
title_sort penile reconstruction with skin grafts and dermal matrices: indications and management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606282
work_keys_str_mv AT trianajuncopaloma penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT doremariela penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT nunezcerezovanesa penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT jimenezgomezjavier penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT miguelferreromiriam penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT diazgonzalezmercedes penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT lopezpereirapedro penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement
AT lopezgutierrezjuancarlos penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement