Cargando…
Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management
Introduction The penis eventually needs specific cutaneous coverage in the context of reconstructive procedures following trauma or congenital anomalies. Local flaps are the first choice but are not always available after multiple previous procedures. In these cases, skin graft and dermal matrices...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606282 |
_version_ | 1783260590461943808 |
---|---|
author | Triana Junco, Paloma Dore, Mariela Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa Jimenez Gomez, Javier Miguel Ferrero, Miriam Díaz González, Mercedes Lopez-Pereira, Pedro Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos |
author_facet | Triana Junco, Paloma Dore, Mariela Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa Jimenez Gomez, Javier Miguel Ferrero, Miriam Díaz González, Mercedes Lopez-Pereira, Pedro Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos |
author_sort | Triana Junco, Paloma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The penis eventually needs specific cutaneous coverage in the context of reconstructive procedures following trauma or congenital anomalies. Local flaps are the first choice but are not always available after multiple previous procedures. In these cases, skin graft and dermal matrices should be considered. Materials and Methods This study was a retrospective review of the past 4 years of four patients with severe loss of penile shaft skin who underwent skin reconstruction. Dermal matrices and skin grafts were utilized. Dermal matrices were placed for a median of 4.5 weeks (3.0–6.0 weeks). The skin graft was harvested from the inner thigh region for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and the inguinal region for full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). Results The four patients presented with complete loss of skin in the penile shaft. One patient had a vesical exstrophy, one had a buried penis with only one corpus cavernosum, one had a wide congenital lymphedema of the genitalia, and one had a lack of skin following circumcision at home. They underwent reconstruction with three patients undergoing split-thickness skin graft; two dermal matrices; and one full-thickness graft, respectively, thereby achieving a good cosmetic and functional result. There were no complications, and all the patients successfully accepted the graft. Conclusion Dermal matrices and skin grafts may serve as effective tools in the management of severe penile skin defects unable to be covered with local flaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5578817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55788172017-09-01 Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management Triana Junco, Paloma Dore, Mariela Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa Jimenez Gomez, Javier Miguel Ferrero, Miriam Díaz González, Mercedes Lopez-Pereira, Pedro Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos European J Pediatr Surg Rep Introduction The penis eventually needs specific cutaneous coverage in the context of reconstructive procedures following trauma or congenital anomalies. Local flaps are the first choice but are not always available after multiple previous procedures. In these cases, skin graft and dermal matrices should be considered. Materials and Methods This study was a retrospective review of the past 4 years of four patients with severe loss of penile shaft skin who underwent skin reconstruction. Dermal matrices and skin grafts were utilized. Dermal matrices were placed for a median of 4.5 weeks (3.0–6.0 weeks). The skin graft was harvested from the inner thigh region for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and the inguinal region for full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). Results The four patients presented with complete loss of skin in the penile shaft. One patient had a vesical exstrophy, one had a buried penis with only one corpus cavernosum, one had a wide congenital lymphedema of the genitalia, and one had a lack of skin following circumcision at home. They underwent reconstruction with three patients undergoing split-thickness skin graft; two dermal matrices; and one full-thickness graft, respectively, thereby achieving a good cosmetic and functional result. There were no complications, and all the patients successfully accepted the graft. Conclusion Dermal matrices and skin grafts may serve as effective tools in the management of severe penile skin defects unable to be covered with local flaps. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-01 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5578817/ /pubmed/28868232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606282 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Triana Junco, Paloma Dore, Mariela Nuñez Cerezo, Vanesa Jimenez Gomez, Javier Miguel Ferrero, Miriam Díaz González, Mercedes Lopez-Pereira, Pedro Lopez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management |
title | Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management |
title_full | Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management |
title_fullStr | Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management |
title_short | Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management |
title_sort | penile reconstruction with skin grafts and dermal matrices: indications and management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trianajuncopaloma penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT doremariela penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT nunezcerezovanesa penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT jimenezgomezjavier penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT miguelferreromiriam penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT diazgonzalezmercedes penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT lopezpereirapedro penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement AT lopezgutierrezjuancarlos penilereconstructionwithskingraftsanddermalmatricesindicationsandmanagement |