Cargando…

Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration

BACKGROUND: Abandoned human-modified forests are refuges for remnant biodiversity. However, there are very few studies on the biodiversity and regeneration of native species in human-modified forests which are rich in exotic trees. Our research aim is to evaluate the regeneration status and biodiver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loo, Lih-Chyun, Song, Guo-Zhang M., Chao, Kuo-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0190-x
_version_ 1783260605105307648
author Loo, Lih-Chyun
Song, Guo-Zhang M.
Chao, Kuo-Jung
author_facet Loo, Lih-Chyun
Song, Guo-Zhang M.
Chao, Kuo-Jung
author_sort Loo, Lih-Chyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abandoned human-modified forests are refuges for remnant biodiversity. However, there are very few studies on the biodiversity and regeneration of native species in human-modified forests which are rich in exotic trees. Our research aim is to evaluate the regeneration status and biodiversity of two adjacent human-modified forests. The two forests have distinct overstorey exotic species richness prior to abandonment: one is an exotic tree plantation low in species richness, and the other is an exotic arboretum high in species richness. The original management practices of the two forests have been neglected for more than 20 years. A primary forest was selected as a reference forest to compare their diversity and regeneration status. We asked: (1) Is there a structural difference among the three forests? (2) What are the proportions of native saplings in the human-modified forests? (3) Are the introduced exotic species able to naturalize? RESULTS: We recorded 1316 individuals from 88 species, belonging to 69 genera and 34 families in the three forests [each sampled 16 quadrats (10 m × 5 m)]. Both human-modified forests were similar in their height structure, diameter structure, and sapling density, but differed in species diversity (characterized by rarefaction curves) and floristic composition (indicated by a quantitative similarity index). In the arboretum, only 50% of the sapling individuals were native. Surprisingly, when sampling efforts were standardized, the arboretum had higher native sapling species richness than the exotic species-poor plantation. Moreover, both human-modified forests had conserved a few rare and endemic species. Nevertheless, some exotic species in the arboretum had escaped to the nearby plantation. CONCLUSIONS: After 20 years of abandonment, the two human-modified forests had converged in structure, but not in diversity patterns of native saplings. This could be due to that the diversity of exotic overstorey composition can influence the natural regeneration of understorey plants. Our study also raised concerns about conserving native species and managing naturalized exotic species in these human-modified forests. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40529-017-0190-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5578950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55789502017-09-18 Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration Loo, Lih-Chyun Song, Guo-Zhang M. Chao, Kuo-Jung Bot Stud Original Article BACKGROUND: Abandoned human-modified forests are refuges for remnant biodiversity. However, there are very few studies on the biodiversity and regeneration of native species in human-modified forests which are rich in exotic trees. Our research aim is to evaluate the regeneration status and biodiversity of two adjacent human-modified forests. The two forests have distinct overstorey exotic species richness prior to abandonment: one is an exotic tree plantation low in species richness, and the other is an exotic arboretum high in species richness. The original management practices of the two forests have been neglected for more than 20 years. A primary forest was selected as a reference forest to compare their diversity and regeneration status. We asked: (1) Is there a structural difference among the three forests? (2) What are the proportions of native saplings in the human-modified forests? (3) Are the introduced exotic species able to naturalize? RESULTS: We recorded 1316 individuals from 88 species, belonging to 69 genera and 34 families in the three forests [each sampled 16 quadrats (10 m × 5 m)]. Both human-modified forests were similar in their height structure, diameter structure, and sapling density, but differed in species diversity (characterized by rarefaction curves) and floristic composition (indicated by a quantitative similarity index). In the arboretum, only 50% of the sapling individuals were native. Surprisingly, when sampling efforts were standardized, the arboretum had higher native sapling species richness than the exotic species-poor plantation. Moreover, both human-modified forests had conserved a few rare and endemic species. Nevertheless, some exotic species in the arboretum had escaped to the nearby plantation. CONCLUSIONS: After 20 years of abandonment, the two human-modified forests had converged in structure, but not in diversity patterns of native saplings. This could be due to that the diversity of exotic overstorey composition can influence the natural regeneration of understorey plants. Our study also raised concerns about conserving native species and managing naturalized exotic species in these human-modified forests. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40529-017-0190-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5578950/ /pubmed/28861854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0190-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Loo, Lih-Chyun
Song, Guo-Zhang M.
Chao, Kuo-Jung
Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
title Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
title_full Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
title_fullStr Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
title_short Characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
title_sort characteristics of tropical human-modified forests after 20 years of natural regeneration
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0190-x
work_keys_str_mv AT loolihchyun characteristicsoftropicalhumanmodifiedforestsafter20yearsofnaturalregeneration
AT songguozhangm characteristicsoftropicalhumanmodifiedforestsafter20yearsofnaturalregeneration
AT chaokuojung characteristicsoftropicalhumanmodifiedforestsafter20yearsofnaturalregeneration