Cargando…
Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans
The effect of free mate choice on the relative magnitude of fitness benefits has been examined among various species. The majority of the data show significant fitness benefits of mating with partners of an individual’s own choice, highlighting elevated behavioral compatibility between partners with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10484-x |
_version_ | 1783260612968579072 |
---|---|
author | Sorokowski, Piotr Groyecka, Agata Karwowski, Maciej Manral, Upma Kumar, Amit Niemczyk, Agnieszka Marczak, Michalina Misiak, Michał Sorokowska, Agnieszka Huanca, Thomas Conde, Esther Wojciszke, Bogdan Pawłowski, Bogusław |
author_facet | Sorokowski, Piotr Groyecka, Agata Karwowski, Maciej Manral, Upma Kumar, Amit Niemczyk, Agnieszka Marczak, Michalina Misiak, Michał Sorokowska, Agnieszka Huanca, Thomas Conde, Esther Wojciszke, Bogdan Pawłowski, Bogusław |
author_sort | Sorokowski, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of free mate choice on the relative magnitude of fitness benefits has been examined among various species. The majority of the data show significant fitness benefits of mating with partners of an individual’s own choice, highlighting elevated behavioral compatibility between partners with free mate choice. Similarities between humans and other species that benefit from free mate choice led us to hypothesize that it also confers reproductive benefits in Homo sapiens. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a study among three indigenous societies—the Tsimane’, Yali, and Bhotiya—who employ natural birth control. In all three samples, we compared the marriages arranged by parents with the non-arranged ones in terms of number of offspring. Here, we show that there were no significant relationships between type of marriage and the total number of alive children and number of dead children among the three sampled groups. The presented study is the first to date to examine the fitness benefits of free mate choice in humans. In discussion we present limitations of our research and discuss the possibility of love having a beneficial influence in terms of the number of offspring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5578983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55789832017-09-06 Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans Sorokowski, Piotr Groyecka, Agata Karwowski, Maciej Manral, Upma Kumar, Amit Niemczyk, Agnieszka Marczak, Michalina Misiak, Michał Sorokowska, Agnieszka Huanca, Thomas Conde, Esther Wojciszke, Bogdan Pawłowski, Bogusław Sci Rep Article The effect of free mate choice on the relative magnitude of fitness benefits has been examined among various species. The majority of the data show significant fitness benefits of mating with partners of an individual’s own choice, highlighting elevated behavioral compatibility between partners with free mate choice. Similarities between humans and other species that benefit from free mate choice led us to hypothesize that it also confers reproductive benefits in Homo sapiens. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a study among three indigenous societies—the Tsimane’, Yali, and Bhotiya—who employ natural birth control. In all three samples, we compared the marriages arranged by parents with the non-arranged ones in terms of number of offspring. Here, we show that there were no significant relationships between type of marriage and the total number of alive children and number of dead children among the three sampled groups. The presented study is the first to date to examine the fitness benefits of free mate choice in humans. In discussion we present limitations of our research and discuss the possibility of love having a beneficial influence in terms of the number of offspring. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5578983/ /pubmed/28860640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10484-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Sorokowski, Piotr Groyecka, Agata Karwowski, Maciej Manral, Upma Kumar, Amit Niemczyk, Agnieszka Marczak, Michalina Misiak, Michał Sorokowska, Agnieszka Huanca, Thomas Conde, Esther Wojciszke, Bogdan Pawłowski, Bogusław Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
title | Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
title_full | Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
title_fullStr | Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
title_short | Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
title_sort | free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10484-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorokowskipiotr freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT groyeckaagata freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT karwowskimaciej freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT manralupma freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT kumaramit freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT niemczykagnieszka freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT marczakmichalina freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT misiakmichał freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT sorokowskaagnieszka freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT huancathomas freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT condeesther freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT wojciszkebogdan freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans AT pawłowskibogusław freematechoicedoesnotinfluencereproductivesuccessinhumans |