Cargando…

Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles

Chromatic pupillometry is an emerging method for evaluating ocular health that relies upon the differential stimulation of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Although it has been investigated in conditions affecting the outer or inner retina, there is a pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rukmini, A. V., Najjar, Raymond P., Atalay, Eray, Sharma, Sourabh, Lock, Jing Zhan, Baskaran, Mani, Nongpiur, Monisha, Gooley, Joshua J., Aung, Tin, Milea, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10303-3
_version_ 1783260668381626368
author Rukmini, A. V.
Najjar, Raymond P.
Atalay, Eray
Sharma, Sourabh
Lock, Jing Zhan
Baskaran, Mani
Nongpiur, Monisha
Gooley, Joshua J.
Aung, Tin
Milea, Dan
author_facet Rukmini, A. V.
Najjar, Raymond P.
Atalay, Eray
Sharma, Sourabh
Lock, Jing Zhan
Baskaran, Mani
Nongpiur, Monisha
Gooley, Joshua J.
Aung, Tin
Milea, Dan
author_sort Rukmini, A. V.
collection PubMed
description Chromatic pupillometry is an emerging method for evaluating ocular health that relies upon the differential stimulation of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Although it has been investigated in conditions affecting the outer or inner retina, there is a paucity of studies in conditions where the anterior chamber of the eye is affected. Primary angle closure suspects (PACS) are defined as eyes with narrow anterior chamber angles and intact retina. PACS patients are at risk of developing primary angle closure glaucoma and are prophylactically treated by performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). Here we evaluated pupillary responses to monchromatic lights in 18 PACS before and after LPI, and compared the results with those of 36 age-matched controls who had gonioscopically open angles. Dose response curves for pupillary constriction were similar between PACS patients and controls (p = 0.98 for blue and 0.90 for red light) and within subjects pre- and post-LPI (p = 0.58 for blue and 0.20 for red light). Baseline-adjusted pupillary constriction responses to blue and red lights were similar in controls and PACS, and not altered after LPI. Our findings suggest that narrow irido-corneal angles and LPI do not influence pupillary responses in PACS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5579237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55792372017-09-06 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles Rukmini, A. V. Najjar, Raymond P. Atalay, Eray Sharma, Sourabh Lock, Jing Zhan Baskaran, Mani Nongpiur, Monisha Gooley, Joshua J. Aung, Tin Milea, Dan Sci Rep Article Chromatic pupillometry is an emerging method for evaluating ocular health that relies upon the differential stimulation of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Although it has been investigated in conditions affecting the outer or inner retina, there is a paucity of studies in conditions where the anterior chamber of the eye is affected. Primary angle closure suspects (PACS) are defined as eyes with narrow anterior chamber angles and intact retina. PACS patients are at risk of developing primary angle closure glaucoma and are prophylactically treated by performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). Here we evaluated pupillary responses to monchromatic lights in 18 PACS before and after LPI, and compared the results with those of 36 age-matched controls who had gonioscopically open angles. Dose response curves for pupillary constriction were similar between PACS patients and controls (p = 0.98 for blue and 0.90 for red light) and within subjects pre- and post-LPI (p = 0.58 for blue and 0.20 for red light). Baseline-adjusted pupillary constriction responses to blue and red lights were similar in controls and PACS, and not altered after LPI. Our findings suggest that narrow irido-corneal angles and LPI do not influence pupillary responses in PACS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5579237/ /pubmed/28860528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10303-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rukmini, A. V.
Najjar, Raymond P.
Atalay, Eray
Sharma, Sourabh
Lock, Jing Zhan
Baskaran, Mani
Nongpiur, Monisha
Gooley, Joshua J.
Aung, Tin
Milea, Dan
Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
title Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
title_full Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
title_fullStr Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
title_full_unstemmed Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
title_short Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
title_sort pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10303-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rukminiav pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT najjarraymondp pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT atalayeray pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT sharmasourabh pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT lockjingzhan pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT baskaranmani pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT nongpiurmonisha pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT gooleyjoshuaj pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT aungtin pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles
AT mileadan pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles