Cargando…
Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Chromatic pupillometry is an emerging method for evaluating ocular health that relies upon the differential stimulation of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Although it has been investigated in conditions affecting the outer or inner retina, there is a pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10303-3 |
_version_ | 1783260668381626368 |
---|---|
author | Rukmini, A. V. Najjar, Raymond P. Atalay, Eray Sharma, Sourabh Lock, Jing Zhan Baskaran, Mani Nongpiur, Monisha Gooley, Joshua J. Aung, Tin Milea, Dan |
author_facet | Rukmini, A. V. Najjar, Raymond P. Atalay, Eray Sharma, Sourabh Lock, Jing Zhan Baskaran, Mani Nongpiur, Monisha Gooley, Joshua J. Aung, Tin Milea, Dan |
author_sort | Rukmini, A. V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chromatic pupillometry is an emerging method for evaluating ocular health that relies upon the differential stimulation of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Although it has been investigated in conditions affecting the outer or inner retina, there is a paucity of studies in conditions where the anterior chamber of the eye is affected. Primary angle closure suspects (PACS) are defined as eyes with narrow anterior chamber angles and intact retina. PACS patients are at risk of developing primary angle closure glaucoma and are prophylactically treated by performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). Here we evaluated pupillary responses to monchromatic lights in 18 PACS before and after LPI, and compared the results with those of 36 age-matched controls who had gonioscopically open angles. Dose response curves for pupillary constriction were similar between PACS patients and controls (p = 0.98 for blue and 0.90 for red light) and within subjects pre- and post-LPI (p = 0.58 for blue and 0.20 for red light). Baseline-adjusted pupillary constriction responses to blue and red lights were similar in controls and PACS, and not altered after LPI. Our findings suggest that narrow irido-corneal angles and LPI do not influence pupillary responses in PACS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5579237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55792372017-09-06 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles Rukmini, A. V. Najjar, Raymond P. Atalay, Eray Sharma, Sourabh Lock, Jing Zhan Baskaran, Mani Nongpiur, Monisha Gooley, Joshua J. Aung, Tin Milea, Dan Sci Rep Article Chromatic pupillometry is an emerging method for evaluating ocular health that relies upon the differential stimulation of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Although it has been investigated in conditions affecting the outer or inner retina, there is a paucity of studies in conditions where the anterior chamber of the eye is affected. Primary angle closure suspects (PACS) are defined as eyes with narrow anterior chamber angles and intact retina. PACS patients are at risk of developing primary angle closure glaucoma and are prophylactically treated by performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). Here we evaluated pupillary responses to monchromatic lights in 18 PACS before and after LPI, and compared the results with those of 36 age-matched controls who had gonioscopically open angles. Dose response curves for pupillary constriction were similar between PACS patients and controls (p = 0.98 for blue and 0.90 for red light) and within subjects pre- and post-LPI (p = 0.58 for blue and 0.20 for red light). Baseline-adjusted pupillary constriction responses to blue and red lights were similar in controls and PACS, and not altered after LPI. Our findings suggest that narrow irido-corneal angles and LPI do not influence pupillary responses in PACS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5579237/ /pubmed/28860528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10303-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rukmini, A. V. Najjar, Raymond P. Atalay, Eray Sharma, Sourabh Lock, Jing Zhan Baskaran, Mani Nongpiur, Monisha Gooley, Joshua J. Aung, Tin Milea, Dan Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
title | Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
title_full | Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
title_fullStr | Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
title_full_unstemmed | Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
title_short | Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
title_sort | pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10303-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rukminiav pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT najjarraymondp pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT atalayeray pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT sharmasourabh pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT lockjingzhan pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT baskaranmani pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT nongpiurmonisha pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT gooleyjoshuaj pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT aungtin pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles AT mileadan pupillaryresponsestolightarenotaffectedbynarrowiridocornealangles |