Cargando…

Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients

BACKGROUND: Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) can be treated arthroscopically by partial reconstruction, tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of the biceps, and debridement. A new treatment option is the additional implantation of a biodegradable spacer (InSpace Balloon®; ISB) into the subacromial sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holschen, Malte, Brand, Florian, Agneskirchner, Jens D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-016-0386-9
_version_ 1783260696598806528
author Holschen, Malte
Brand, Florian
Agneskirchner, Jens D.
author_facet Holschen, Malte
Brand, Florian
Agneskirchner, Jens D.
author_sort Holschen, Malte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) can be treated arthroscopically by partial reconstruction, tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of the biceps, and debridement. A new treatment option is the additional implantation of a biodegradable spacer (InSpace Balloon®; ISB) into the subacromial space, which reduces subacromial shear forces to keep the humeral head centered in the glenoid. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome of patients with MRCT who were treated arthroscopically with or without an additional ISB. METHODS: The clinical outcome of patients treated with conventional arthroscopic techniques (n = 11, group A, partial repair, biceps tenotomy, and debridement) and that of patients treated with a supplementary ISB (n = 12, group B) was retrospectively analyzed. Preoperatively and postoperatively, shoulder function was assessed with the Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. At follow-up after a mean of 22 months, patients filled out a questionnaire about their subjective satisfaction. RESULTS: Preoperative shoulder function was lower in patients treated with an ISB (ASES score: group A, 59.1; group B, 31.5; Constant score: group A, 60.7; group B, 36.8). At follow-up, both groups had improved shoulder function (Constant score: group A, 60.7–77.6; p < 0.001; group B, 36.8–69.5; p < 0.001; ASES score: group A, 59.1–88.6; p < 0.001; group B, 31.5–85.7; p < 0.001). Patients in both groups were subjectively satisfied with their outcome. CONCLUSION: The ISB is a feasible treatment option for MRCT, providing subjective pain relief and improved shoulder function. Further studies with larger patient collectives and longer follow-up are needed to confirm whether it is a safe and cost-effective treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5579412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55794122017-09-01 Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients Holschen, Malte Brand, Florian Agneskirchner, Jens D. Obere Extrem Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) can be treated arthroscopically by partial reconstruction, tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of the biceps, and debridement. A new treatment option is the additional implantation of a biodegradable spacer (InSpace Balloon®; ISB) into the subacromial space, which reduces subacromial shear forces to keep the humeral head centered in the glenoid. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome of patients with MRCT who were treated arthroscopically with or without an additional ISB. METHODS: The clinical outcome of patients treated with conventional arthroscopic techniques (n = 11, group A, partial repair, biceps tenotomy, and debridement) and that of patients treated with a supplementary ISB (n = 12, group B) was retrospectively analyzed. Preoperatively and postoperatively, shoulder function was assessed with the Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. At follow-up after a mean of 22 months, patients filled out a questionnaire about their subjective satisfaction. RESULTS: Preoperative shoulder function was lower in patients treated with an ISB (ASES score: group A, 59.1; group B, 31.5; Constant score: group A, 60.7; group B, 36.8). At follow-up, both groups had improved shoulder function (Constant score: group A, 60.7–77.6; p < 0.001; group B, 36.8–69.5; p < 0.001; ASES score: group A, 59.1–88.6; p < 0.001; group B, 31.5–85.7; p < 0.001). Patients in both groups were subjectively satisfied with their outcome. CONCLUSION: The ISB is a feasible treatment option for MRCT, providing subjective pain relief and improved shoulder function. Further studies with larger patient collectives and longer follow-up are needed to confirm whether it is a safe and cost-effective treatment. Springer Medizin 2016-12-01 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5579412/ /pubmed/28868086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-016-0386-9 Text en © Springer Medizin Verlag Berlin 2016
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Holschen, Malte
Brand, Florian
Agneskirchner, Jens D.
Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
title Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
title_full Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
title_fullStr Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
title_full_unstemmed Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
title_short Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: Clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
title_sort subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears: clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated patients
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-016-0386-9
work_keys_str_mv AT holschenmalte subacromialspacerimplantationformassiverotatorcufftearsclinicaloutcomeofarthroscopicallytreatedpatients
AT brandflorian subacromialspacerimplantationformassiverotatorcufftearsclinicaloutcomeofarthroscopicallytreatedpatients
AT agneskirchnerjensd subacromialspacerimplantationformassiverotatorcufftearsclinicaloutcomeofarthroscopicallytreatedpatients