Cargando…

A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ambu(®) AuraGain™ (AG) (Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) is a supraglottic device which has a design facilitating its use as a conduit for intubation. We designed this prospective observational study to assess the ease of AG placement in paralysed patients, determine its position and al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parikh, Devangi A, Jain, Ruchi A, Lele, Smita S, Tendolkar, Bharati A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890558
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_285_17
_version_ 1783260791835721728
author Parikh, Devangi A
Jain, Ruchi A
Lele, Smita S
Tendolkar, Bharati A
author_facet Parikh, Devangi A
Jain, Ruchi A
Lele, Smita S
Tendolkar, Bharati A
author_sort Parikh, Devangi A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ambu(®) AuraGain™ (AG) (Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) is a supraglottic device which has a design facilitating its use as a conduit for intubation. We designed this prospective observational study to assess the ease of AG placement in paralysed patients, determine its position and alignment to the glottis and assess its utility as a conduit for intubation. METHODS: One hundred patients, aged 18–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study. The ease and number of attempts for successful insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, leak pressures, fibre-optic grade of view, number of attempts and time for tracheal intubation, time for AG removal and complications were recorded. The mean, standard deviation (SD), interquartile range (IQR) and range were calculated. The upper limit of confidence interval for overall failure rate was calculated using Wilson's score method. RESULTS: AG was successfully inserted in all patients. The mean (SD) time taken for insertion was 17.32 (8.48) s. The median [IQR] leak pressures were 24 [20–28] cm of H(2)O. Optimal laryngeal view for intubation was obtained in 68 patients. Eighty-eight patients could be intubated in the first attempt. Five patients could not be intubated. The overall failure rate of device was 9%. CONCLUSION: AMBU(®) AuraGain™ serves as an effective ventilating aid, but caution is suggested before using it as a conduit for endotracheal intubation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5579853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55798532017-09-08 A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study Parikh, Devangi A Jain, Ruchi A Lele, Smita S Tendolkar, Bharati A Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ambu(®) AuraGain™ (AG) (Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) is a supraglottic device which has a design facilitating its use as a conduit for intubation. We designed this prospective observational study to assess the ease of AG placement in paralysed patients, determine its position and alignment to the glottis and assess its utility as a conduit for intubation. METHODS: One hundred patients, aged 18–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study. The ease and number of attempts for successful insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, leak pressures, fibre-optic grade of view, number of attempts and time for tracheal intubation, time for AG removal and complications were recorded. The mean, standard deviation (SD), interquartile range (IQR) and range were calculated. The upper limit of confidence interval for overall failure rate was calculated using Wilson's score method. RESULTS: AG was successfully inserted in all patients. The mean (SD) time taken for insertion was 17.32 (8.48) s. The median [IQR] leak pressures were 24 [20–28] cm of H(2)O. Optimal laryngeal view for intubation was obtained in 68 patients. Eighty-eight patients could be intubated in the first attempt. Five patients could not be intubated. The overall failure rate of device was 9%. CONCLUSION: AMBU(®) AuraGain™ serves as an effective ventilating aid, but caution is suggested before using it as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5579853/ /pubmed/28890558 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_285_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parikh, Devangi A
Jain, Ruchi A
Lele, Smita S
Tendolkar, Bharati A
A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study
title A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study
title_full A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study
title_fullStr A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study
title_short A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu(®) AuraGain™: A prospective observational study
title_sort cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of ambu(®) auragain™: a prospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890558
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_285_17
work_keys_str_mv AT parikhdevangia acohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jainruchia acohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lelesmitas acohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT tendolkarbharatia acohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT parikhdevangia cohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jainruchia cohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lelesmitas cohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT tendolkarbharatia cohortevaluationofclinicaluseandperformancecharacteristicsofambuauragainaprospectiveobservationalstudy