Cargando…

Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years

BACKGROUND: Whether age at onset influences Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression and the effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) therapy is not clear. We aimed to compare longitudinal cognitive and global outcomes in ChEI-treated patients with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) versus l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wattmo, Carina, Wallin, Åsa K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0294-2
_version_ 1783260876907741184
author Wattmo, Carina
Wallin, Åsa K.
author_facet Wattmo, Carina
Wallin, Åsa K.
author_sort Wattmo, Carina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether age at onset influences Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression and the effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) therapy is not clear. We aimed to compare longitudinal cognitive and global outcomes in ChEI-treated patients with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) in clinical practice. METHODS: This 3-year, prospective, observational, multicentre study included 1017 participants with mild to moderate AD; 143 had EOAD (age at onset < 65 years) and 874 had LOAD (age at onset ≥ 65 years). At baseline and semi-annually, patients were assessed using cognitive, global and activities of daily living (ADL) scales, and the dose of ChEI was recorded. Potential predictors of decline were analysed using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Six-month response to ChEI therapy and long-term prognosis in cognitive and global performance were similar between the age-at-onset groups. However, deterioration was significantly faster when using the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) over 3 years in participants with EOAD than in those with LOAD; hence, prediction models for the mean ADAS-Cog trajectories are presented. The younger cohort had a larger proportion of homozygote apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele carriers than the older cohort; however, APOE genotype was not a significant predictor of cognitive impairment in the multivariate models. A slower rate of cognitive progression was related to initiation of ChEIs at an earlier stage of AD, higher ChEI dose and fewer years of education in both groups. In LOAD, male sex, better instrumental ADL ability and no antipsychotic drug use were additional protective characteristics. The older patients received a lower ChEI dose than the younger individuals during most of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although the participants with EOAD showed a faster decline in ADAS-Cog, had a longer duration of AD before diagnosis, and had a higher frequency of two APOE ε4 alleles than those with LOAD, the cognitive and global responses to ChEI treatment and the longitudinal outcomes after 3 years were similar between the age-at-onset groups. A higher mean dose of ChEI and better cognitive status at the start of therapy were independent protective factors in both groups, stressing the importance of early treatment in adequate doses for all patients with AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5580278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55802782017-09-07 Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years Wattmo, Carina Wallin, Åsa K. Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Whether age at onset influences Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression and the effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) therapy is not clear. We aimed to compare longitudinal cognitive and global outcomes in ChEI-treated patients with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) in clinical practice. METHODS: This 3-year, prospective, observational, multicentre study included 1017 participants with mild to moderate AD; 143 had EOAD (age at onset < 65 years) and 874 had LOAD (age at onset ≥ 65 years). At baseline and semi-annually, patients were assessed using cognitive, global and activities of daily living (ADL) scales, and the dose of ChEI was recorded. Potential predictors of decline were analysed using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Six-month response to ChEI therapy and long-term prognosis in cognitive and global performance were similar between the age-at-onset groups. However, deterioration was significantly faster when using the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) over 3 years in participants with EOAD than in those with LOAD; hence, prediction models for the mean ADAS-Cog trajectories are presented. The younger cohort had a larger proportion of homozygote apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele carriers than the older cohort; however, APOE genotype was not a significant predictor of cognitive impairment in the multivariate models. A slower rate of cognitive progression was related to initiation of ChEIs at an earlier stage of AD, higher ChEI dose and fewer years of education in both groups. In LOAD, male sex, better instrumental ADL ability and no antipsychotic drug use were additional protective characteristics. The older patients received a lower ChEI dose than the younger individuals during most of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although the participants with EOAD showed a faster decline in ADAS-Cog, had a longer duration of AD before diagnosis, and had a higher frequency of two APOE ε4 alleles than those with LOAD, the cognitive and global responses to ChEI treatment and the longitudinal outcomes after 3 years were similar between the age-at-onset groups. A higher mean dose of ChEI and better cognitive status at the start of therapy were independent protective factors in both groups, stressing the importance of early treatment in adequate doses for all patients with AD. BioMed Central 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5580278/ /pubmed/28859660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0294-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wattmo, Carina
Wallin, Åsa K.
Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
title Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
title_full Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
title_fullStr Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
title_full_unstemmed Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
title_short Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
title_sort early- versus late-onset alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice: cognitive and global outcomes over 3 years
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0294-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wattmocarina earlyversuslateonsetalzheimersdiseaseinclinicalpracticecognitiveandglobaloutcomesover3years
AT wallinasak earlyversuslateonsetalzheimersdiseaseinclinicalpracticecognitiveandglobaloutcomesover3years