Cargando…

Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials

BACKGROUND: The failure to retain patients or collect primary-outcome data is a common challenge for trials and reduces the statistical power and potentially introduces bias into the analysis. Identifying strategies to minimise missing data was the second highest methodological research priority in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kearney, Anna, Daykin, Anne, Shaw, Alison R. G., Lane, Athene J., Blazeby, Jane M., Clarke, Mike, Williamson, Paula, Gamble, Carrol
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2017
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z

Ejemplares similares

Pragmatic approaches to mitigating missing data and research priorities to assess the effectiveness of interventions
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

“To have, to hold, from this day forward”: understanding current practice regarding the retention of trial participants
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A review of the description of patient withdrawal in trial protocols and patient information sheets (PIS)
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reported reasons for missing data and the interplay with trial setting
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
por: Tudur Smith, Catrin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
por: Bower, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

An ethnographic study of group decision making to understand and improve how trial steering committees contribute to trial conduct
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

‘We all want to succeed, but we’ve also got to be realistic about what is happening’: an ethnographic study of relationships in trial oversight and their impact
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What are the roles and valued attributes of a Trial Steering Committee? Ethnographic study of eight clinical trials facing challenges
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
por: Williamson, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
por: Rosala-Hallas, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Developing an online, searchable database to systematically map and organise current literature on retention research (ORRCA2)
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials (ORRCA)
por: Harman, Nicola, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Optimising the design and evaluation of pilot work to inform the main trial: a review of current evidence and consideration of future practices
por: O'Connell Francischetto, Elaine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomised trials
por: Jones, Ashley P, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials
por: Jones, Ashley, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
por: Rosala-Hallas, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study
por: Brunsdon, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Optimising the design of internal pilot work to inform efficient randomised controlled trials: issues to consider when developing progression criteria
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Detailed systematic analysis of recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials in patients with an unscheduled admission to hospital
por: Rowlands, Ceri, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
por: Healy, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials
por: Jones, Ashley P, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A third trial oversight committee: Functions, benefits and issues
por: Lane, J Athene, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Application and investigation of a bound for outcome reporting bias
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Enhancing public involvement in trial oversight committees through qualitative research with eight trials facing challenges
por: Nicholson, A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A mapping and gapping analysis of patient and public involvement in a clinical trials unit
por: Bagley, Heather, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies
por: Avery, Kerry N L, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice
por: Conroy, Elizabeth J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of randomised surgical trials: a review of existing guidance
por: Conroy, Elizabeth J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Priority setting partnership to identify the top 10 research priorities for the management of Parkinson's disease
por: Deane, Katherine H O, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ln9upsf2tqucrgbjpnjl7d8js1