Cargando…
A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are del...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28763021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080864 |
_version_ | 1783260924519383040 |
---|---|
author | Franco, Lara S. Shanahan, Danielle F. Fuller, Richard A. |
author_facet | Franco, Lara S. Shanahan, Danielle F. Fuller, Richard A. |
author_sort | Franco, Lara S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are delivered through the non-visual senses and these are potentially avenues through which a physiological mechanism could occur. Here we review the evidence around these lesser studied sensory pathways—through sound, smell, taste, touch, and three non-sensory pathways. Natural sounds and smells underpin experiences of nature for many people, and this may well be rooted in evolutionary psychology. Tactile experiences of nature, particularly beyond animal petting, are understudied yet potentially fundamentally important. Tastes of nature, through growing and consuming natural foods, have been linked with a range of health and well-being benefits. Beyond the five senses, evidence is emerging for other non-visual pathways for nature experiences to be effective. These include ingestion or inhalation of phytoncides, negative air ions and microbes. We conclude that (i) these non-visual avenues are potentially important for delivering benefits from nature experiences; (ii) the evidence base is relatively weak and often based on correlational studies; and (iii) deeper exploration of these sensory and non-sensory avenues is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5580568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55805682017-09-05 A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye Franco, Lara S. Shanahan, Danielle F. Fuller, Richard A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are delivered through the non-visual senses and these are potentially avenues through which a physiological mechanism could occur. Here we review the evidence around these lesser studied sensory pathways—through sound, smell, taste, touch, and three non-sensory pathways. Natural sounds and smells underpin experiences of nature for many people, and this may well be rooted in evolutionary psychology. Tactile experiences of nature, particularly beyond animal petting, are understudied yet potentially fundamentally important. Tastes of nature, through growing and consuming natural foods, have been linked with a range of health and well-being benefits. Beyond the five senses, evidence is emerging for other non-visual pathways for nature experiences to be effective. These include ingestion or inhalation of phytoncides, negative air ions and microbes. We conclude that (i) these non-visual avenues are potentially important for delivering benefits from nature experiences; (ii) the evidence base is relatively weak and often based on correlational studies; and (iii) deeper exploration of these sensory and non-sensory avenues is needed. MDPI 2017-08-01 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5580568/ /pubmed/28763021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080864 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Franco, Lara S. Shanahan, Danielle F. Fuller, Richard A. A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye |
title | A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye |
title_full | A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye |
title_fullStr | A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye |
title_short | A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye |
title_sort | review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28763021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francolaras areviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye AT shanahandaniellef areviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye AT fullerricharda areviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye AT francolaras reviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye AT shanahandaniellef reviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye AT fullerricharda reviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye |