Cargando…

A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye

Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are del...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franco, Lara S., Shanahan, Danielle F., Fuller, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28763021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080864
_version_ 1783260924519383040
author Franco, Lara S.
Shanahan, Danielle F.
Fuller, Richard A.
author_facet Franco, Lara S.
Shanahan, Danielle F.
Fuller, Richard A.
author_sort Franco, Lara S.
collection PubMed
description Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are delivered through the non-visual senses and these are potentially avenues through which a physiological mechanism could occur. Here we review the evidence around these lesser studied sensory pathways—through sound, smell, taste, touch, and three non-sensory pathways. Natural sounds and smells underpin experiences of nature for many people, and this may well be rooted in evolutionary psychology. Tactile experiences of nature, particularly beyond animal petting, are understudied yet potentially fundamentally important. Tastes of nature, through growing and consuming natural foods, have been linked with a range of health and well-being benefits. Beyond the five senses, evidence is emerging for other non-visual pathways for nature experiences to be effective. These include ingestion or inhalation of phytoncides, negative air ions and microbes. We conclude that (i) these non-visual avenues are potentially important for delivering benefits from nature experiences; (ii) the evidence base is relatively weak and often based on correlational studies; and (iii) deeper exploration of these sensory and non-sensory avenues is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5580568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55805682017-09-05 A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye Franco, Lara S. Shanahan, Danielle F. Fuller, Richard A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are delivered through the non-visual senses and these are potentially avenues through which a physiological mechanism could occur. Here we review the evidence around these lesser studied sensory pathways—through sound, smell, taste, touch, and three non-sensory pathways. Natural sounds and smells underpin experiences of nature for many people, and this may well be rooted in evolutionary psychology. Tactile experiences of nature, particularly beyond animal petting, are understudied yet potentially fundamentally important. Tastes of nature, through growing and consuming natural foods, have been linked with a range of health and well-being benefits. Beyond the five senses, evidence is emerging for other non-visual pathways for nature experiences to be effective. These include ingestion or inhalation of phytoncides, negative air ions and microbes. We conclude that (i) these non-visual avenues are potentially important for delivering benefits from nature experiences; (ii) the evidence base is relatively weak and often based on correlational studies; and (iii) deeper exploration of these sensory and non-sensory avenues is needed. MDPI 2017-08-01 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5580568/ /pubmed/28763021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080864 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Franco, Lara S.
Shanahan, Danielle F.
Fuller, Richard A.
A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
title A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
title_full A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
title_fullStr A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
title_full_unstemmed A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
title_short A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye
title_sort review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28763021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080864
work_keys_str_mv AT francolaras areviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye
AT shanahandaniellef areviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye
AT fullerricharda areviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye
AT francolaras reviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye
AT shanahandaniellef reviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye
AT fullerricharda reviewofthebenefitsofnatureexperiencesmorethanmeetstheeye