Cargando…

Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies

There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniels, Kevin, Watson, David, Gedikli, Cigdem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28813009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080918
_version_ 1783260937128509440
author Daniels, Kevin
Watson, David
Gedikli, Cigdem
author_facet Daniels, Kevin
Watson, David
Gedikli, Cigdem
author_sort Daniels, Kevin
collection PubMed
description There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions, and also considered performance as an outcome. We found eight studies of interventions. Six studies were of interventions that were based on introducing shared social activities into workgroups. Six out of the six studies demonstrated improvements in well-being across the sample (five studies), or for an identifiable sub-group (one study). Four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in social environments, and four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in indicators of performance. Analysis of implementation factors indicated that the interventions based on shared activities require some external facilitation, favorable worker attitudes prior to the intervention, and several different components. We found two studies that focused on improving fairness perceptions in the workplace. There were no consistent effects of these interventions on well-being or performance. We conclude that there is some evidence that interventions that increase the frequency of shared activities between workers can improve worker well-being and performance. We offer suggestions for improving the evidence base.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5580621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55806212017-09-05 Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies Daniels, Kevin Watson, David Gedikli, Cigdem Int J Environ Res Public Health Review There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions, and also considered performance as an outcome. We found eight studies of interventions. Six studies were of interventions that were based on introducing shared social activities into workgroups. Six out of the six studies demonstrated improvements in well-being across the sample (five studies), or for an identifiable sub-group (one study). Four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in social environments, and four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in indicators of performance. Analysis of implementation factors indicated that the interventions based on shared activities require some external facilitation, favorable worker attitudes prior to the intervention, and several different components. We found two studies that focused on improving fairness perceptions in the workplace. There were no consistent effects of these interventions on well-being or performance. We conclude that there is some evidence that interventions that increase the frequency of shared activities between workers can improve worker well-being and performance. We offer suggestions for improving the evidence base. MDPI 2017-08-16 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5580621/ /pubmed/28813009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080918 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Daniels, Kevin
Watson, David
Gedikli, Cigdem
Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_full Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_fullStr Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_full_unstemmed Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_short Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_sort well-being and the social environment of work: a systematic review of intervention studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28813009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080918
work_keys_str_mv AT danielskevin wellbeingandthesocialenvironmentofworkasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT watsondavid wellbeingandthesocialenvironmentofworkasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT gediklicigdem wellbeingandthesocialenvironmentofworkasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies