Cargando…
Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28813009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080918 |
_version_ | 1783260937128509440 |
---|---|
author | Daniels, Kevin Watson, David Gedikli, Cigdem |
author_facet | Daniels, Kevin Watson, David Gedikli, Cigdem |
author_sort | Daniels, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions, and also considered performance as an outcome. We found eight studies of interventions. Six studies were of interventions that were based on introducing shared social activities into workgroups. Six out of the six studies demonstrated improvements in well-being across the sample (five studies), or for an identifiable sub-group (one study). Four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in social environments, and four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in indicators of performance. Analysis of implementation factors indicated that the interventions based on shared activities require some external facilitation, favorable worker attitudes prior to the intervention, and several different components. We found two studies that focused on improving fairness perceptions in the workplace. There were no consistent effects of these interventions on well-being or performance. We conclude that there is some evidence that interventions that increase the frequency of shared activities between workers can improve worker well-being and performance. We offer suggestions for improving the evidence base. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5580621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55806212017-09-05 Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies Daniels, Kevin Watson, David Gedikli, Cigdem Int J Environ Res Public Health Review There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions, and also considered performance as an outcome. We found eight studies of interventions. Six studies were of interventions that were based on introducing shared social activities into workgroups. Six out of the six studies demonstrated improvements in well-being across the sample (five studies), or for an identifiable sub-group (one study). Four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in social environments, and four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in indicators of performance. Analysis of implementation factors indicated that the interventions based on shared activities require some external facilitation, favorable worker attitudes prior to the intervention, and several different components. We found two studies that focused on improving fairness perceptions in the workplace. There were no consistent effects of these interventions on well-being or performance. We conclude that there is some evidence that interventions that increase the frequency of shared activities between workers can improve worker well-being and performance. We offer suggestions for improving the evidence base. MDPI 2017-08-16 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5580621/ /pubmed/28813009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080918 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Daniels, Kevin Watson, David Gedikli, Cigdem Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies |
title | Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies |
title_full | Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies |
title_fullStr | Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies |
title_short | Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies |
title_sort | well-being and the social environment of work: a systematic review of intervention studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28813009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielskevin wellbeingandthesocialenvironmentofworkasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies AT watsondavid wellbeingandthesocialenvironmentofworkasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies AT gediklicigdem wellbeingandthesocialenvironmentofworkasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies |