Cargando…

Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation

BACKGROUND: During the preoperative discussion prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), patients are often interested in data regarding rates of revision reconstruction, reoperation, concomitant pathologic changes, and future contralateral ACL injury. PURPOSE: To analyze a single s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riff, Andrew J., Luchetti, Timothy J., Weber, Alexander E., Chahal, Jaskarndip, Bach, Bernard R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117724345
_version_ 1783260958017191936
author Riff, Andrew J.
Luchetti, Timothy J.
Weber, Alexander E.
Chahal, Jaskarndip
Bach, Bernard R.
author_facet Riff, Andrew J.
Luchetti, Timothy J.
Weber, Alexander E.
Chahal, Jaskarndip
Bach, Bernard R.
author_sort Riff, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the preoperative discussion prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), patients are often interested in data regarding rates of revision reconstruction, reoperation, concomitant pathologic changes, and future contralateral ACL injury. PURPOSE: To analyze a single surgeon’s experience with primary and revision ACLR over a 30-year interval, focusing on incidence and risk factors for revision and reoperation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACLR from 1986 to 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Covariates of interest included age, sex, time, and graft selection. Outcomes of interest included revision and reoperation rates. RESULTS: A total of 2450 ACLRs (mean patient age, 29 years; 58% male) were reviewed. Among primary ACLRs performed (n = 2225), 68% entailed bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft and 30% entailed BTB allograft. Patients undergoing ACLR with autograft and allograft had a mean age of 22 and 37 years, respectively. The rate of revision ACLR was 1.8% and 3.5% for primary and revision cases, respectively. An increased rate of revision was noted among females compared with males (2.6% vs 1.2%) and among allografts compared with autografts (2.7% vs 1.3%). Low-dose irradiation did not affect allograft revision rates. The nonrevision reoperation rate following primary ACLR was 12%. The nonrevision reoperation rate was lower among primary cases reconstructed with allograft than autograft (9% vs 13%). Seventeen percent of cases involved concomitant meniscal repair and, among these, 13% required revision meniscal surgery. The rate of contralateral ACLR was 5.3% CONCLUSION: This information is useful in the informed consent process, for perioperative decision making regarding graft choice, and for identifying patients who are at risk for injuring the uninvolved knee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5580852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55808522017-09-08 Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation Riff, Andrew J. Luchetti, Timothy J. Weber, Alexander E. Chahal, Jaskarndip Bach, Bernard R. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: During the preoperative discussion prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), patients are often interested in data regarding rates of revision reconstruction, reoperation, concomitant pathologic changes, and future contralateral ACL injury. PURPOSE: To analyze a single surgeon’s experience with primary and revision ACLR over a 30-year interval, focusing on incidence and risk factors for revision and reoperation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACLR from 1986 to 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Covariates of interest included age, sex, time, and graft selection. Outcomes of interest included revision and reoperation rates. RESULTS: A total of 2450 ACLRs (mean patient age, 29 years; 58% male) were reviewed. Among primary ACLRs performed (n = 2225), 68% entailed bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft and 30% entailed BTB allograft. Patients undergoing ACLR with autograft and allograft had a mean age of 22 and 37 years, respectively. The rate of revision ACLR was 1.8% and 3.5% for primary and revision cases, respectively. An increased rate of revision was noted among females compared with males (2.6% vs 1.2%) and among allografts compared with autografts (2.7% vs 1.3%). Low-dose irradiation did not affect allograft revision rates. The nonrevision reoperation rate following primary ACLR was 12%. The nonrevision reoperation rate was lower among primary cases reconstructed with allograft than autograft (9% vs 13%). Seventeen percent of cases involved concomitant meniscal repair and, among these, 13% required revision meniscal surgery. The rate of contralateral ACLR was 5.3% CONCLUSION: This information is useful in the informed consent process, for perioperative decision making regarding graft choice, and for identifying patients who are at risk for injuring the uninvolved knee. SAGE Publications 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5580852/ /pubmed/28890904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117724345 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 25
Riff, Andrew J.
Luchetti, Timothy J.
Weber, Alexander E.
Chahal, Jaskarndip
Bach, Bernard R.
Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation
title Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation
title_full Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation
title_fullStr Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation
title_full_unstemmed Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation
title_short Thirty-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon: A Critical Evaluation of Revision and Reoperation
title_sort thirty-year experience with acl reconstruction using patellar tendon: a critical evaluation of revision and reoperation
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117724345
work_keys_str_mv AT riffandrewj thirtyyearexperiencewithaclreconstructionusingpatellartendonacriticalevaluationofrevisionandreoperation
AT luchettitimothyj thirtyyearexperiencewithaclreconstructionusingpatellartendonacriticalevaluationofrevisionandreoperation
AT weberalexandere thirtyyearexperiencewithaclreconstructionusingpatellartendonacriticalevaluationofrevisionandreoperation
AT chahaljaskarndip thirtyyearexperiencewithaclreconstructionusingpatellartendonacriticalevaluationofrevisionandreoperation
AT bachbernardr thirtyyearexperiencewithaclreconstructionusingpatellartendonacriticalevaluationofrevisionandreoperation