Cargando…

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma

The clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies for infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) are not uniform. The primary objectives of this study were to identify the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognoses between ILC and IDC, and identify the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zheling, Yang, Jiao, Li, Shuting, Lv, Meng, Shen, Yanwei, Wang, Biyuan, Li, Pan, Yi, Min, Zhao, Xiao’ai, Zhang, Lingxiao, Wang, Le, Yang, Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182397
_version_ 1783260965575327744
author Chen, Zheling
Yang, Jiao
Li, Shuting
Lv, Meng
Shen, Yanwei
Wang, Biyuan
Li, Pan
Yi, Min
Zhao, Xiao’ai
Zhang, Lingxiao
Wang, Le
Yang, Jin
author_facet Chen, Zheling
Yang, Jiao
Li, Shuting
Lv, Meng
Shen, Yanwei
Wang, Biyuan
Li, Pan
Yi, Min
Zhao, Xiao’ai
Zhang, Lingxiao
Wang, Le
Yang, Jin
author_sort Chen, Zheling
collection PubMed
description The clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies for infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) are not uniform. The primary objectives of this study were to identify the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognoses between ILC and IDC, and identify the high-risk population based on the hormone receptor status and metastasis sites. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database was searched and patients diagnosed with ILC or IDC from 1990 to 2013 were identified. In total,796,335 patients were analyzed, including 85,048 withILC (10.7%) and 711,287 withIDC (89.3%). The ILC group was correlatedwith older age, larger tumor size, later stage, lower grade, metastasis disease(M1) disease, and greater counts ofpositive lymph nodesandestrogen-receptor-positive (ER)/progesterone receptor-positive (PR) positive nodes. The overall survival showed an early advantage for ILC but a worse outcome after 5 years. Regarding the disease-specific survival, the IDC cohort had advantages over the ILC group, both during the early years and long-term. In hormone status and metastasis site subgroup analyses, the ER+/PR+ subgroup had the best survival, while the ER+/PR- subgroup had the worst outcome, especially the ILC cohort. ILC and IDC had different metastasis patterns. The proportion of bone metastasis was higher in the ILC group (91.52%) than that in the IDC (76.04%), and the ILC group was more likely to have multiple metastasis sites. Survival analyses showed patients with ILC had a higher risk of liver metastasis (disease-specific survival[DSS]; P = 0.046), but had a better overall survival than the bone metastasis group (P<0.0001). We concluded that the long-term prognosis for ILC was poorer than that for IDC, and the ER+/PR- subgroup had the worst outcome. Therefore, the metastasis pattern and prognosis must be seriously evaluated, and a combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5580913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55809132017-09-15 Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma Chen, Zheling Yang, Jiao Li, Shuting Lv, Meng Shen, Yanwei Wang, Biyuan Li, Pan Yi, Min Zhao, Xiao’ai Zhang, Lingxiao Wang, Le Yang, Jin PLoS One Research Article The clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies for infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) are not uniform. The primary objectives of this study were to identify the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognoses between ILC and IDC, and identify the high-risk population based on the hormone receptor status and metastasis sites. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database was searched and patients diagnosed with ILC or IDC from 1990 to 2013 were identified. In total,796,335 patients were analyzed, including 85,048 withILC (10.7%) and 711,287 withIDC (89.3%). The ILC group was correlatedwith older age, larger tumor size, later stage, lower grade, metastasis disease(M1) disease, and greater counts ofpositive lymph nodesandestrogen-receptor-positive (ER)/progesterone receptor-positive (PR) positive nodes. The overall survival showed an early advantage for ILC but a worse outcome after 5 years. Regarding the disease-specific survival, the IDC cohort had advantages over the ILC group, both during the early years and long-term. In hormone status and metastasis site subgroup analyses, the ER+/PR+ subgroup had the best survival, while the ER+/PR- subgroup had the worst outcome, especially the ILC cohort. ILC and IDC had different metastasis patterns. The proportion of bone metastasis was higher in the ILC group (91.52%) than that in the IDC (76.04%), and the ILC group was more likely to have multiple metastasis sites. Survival analyses showed patients with ILC had a higher risk of liver metastasis (disease-specific survival[DSS]; P = 0.046), but had a better overall survival than the bone metastasis group (P<0.0001). We concluded that the long-term prognosis for ILC was poorer than that for IDC, and the ER+/PR- subgroup had the worst outcome. Therefore, the metastasis pattern and prognosis must be seriously evaluated, and a combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy should be considered. Public Library of Science 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5580913/ /pubmed/28863134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182397 Text en © 2017 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Zheling
Yang, Jiao
Li, Shuting
Lv, Meng
Shen, Yanwei
Wang, Biyuan
Li, Pan
Yi, Min
Zhao, Xiao’ai
Zhang, Lingxiao
Wang, Le
Yang, Jin
Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
title Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_full Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_fullStr Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_short Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_sort invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182397
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzheling invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT yangjiao invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT lishuting invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT lvmeng invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT shenyanwei invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT wangbiyuan invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT lipan invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT yimin invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT zhaoxiaoai invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT zhanglingxiao invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT wangle invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT yangjin invasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastaspecialhistologicaltypecomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma