Cargando…
Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183423 |
_version_ | 1783260966294650880 |
---|---|
author | Nagata, Naoyoshi Sakurai, Toshiyuki Moriyasu, Shiori Shimbo, Takuro Okubo, Hidetaka Watanabe, Kazuhiro Yokoi, Chizu Yanase, Mikio Akiyama, Junichi Uemura, Naomi |
author_facet | Nagata, Naoyoshi Sakurai, Toshiyuki Moriyasu, Shiori Shimbo, Takuro Okubo, Hidetaka Watanabe, Kazuhiro Yokoi, Chizu Yanase, Mikio Akiyama, Junichi Uemura, Naomi |
author_sort | Nagata, Naoyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB. METHODS: Baseline, endoscopy, and outcome data were reviewed for 314 patients with acute GIB: 157 anticoagulant users and 157 age-, sex-, and important risk-matched non-users. Data were also compared between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin users. RESULTS: Between anticoagulant users and non-users, of whom 70% underwent early endoscopy, no endoscopy-related adverse events or significant differences were found in the rate of endoscopic therapy need, transfusion need, rebleeding, or thromboembolism. Rebleeding was associated with shock, comorbidities, low platelet count and albumin level, and low-dose aspirin use but not HAS-BLED score, any endoscopic results, heparin bridge, or international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.5. Risks for thromboembolism were INR ≥ 2.5, difference in onset and pre-endoscopic INR, reversal agent use, and anticoagulant interruption but not CHA2DS2-VASc score, any endoscopic results, or heparin bridge. In patients without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption, there was only one rebleeding event and no thromboembolic events. Warfarin users had a significantly higher transfusion need than DOACs users. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy appears to be safe for anticoagulant users with acute GIB compared with non-users. Patient background factors were associated with rebleeding, whereas anticoagulant management factors (e.g. INR correction, reversal agent use, and drug interruption) were associated with thromboembolism. Early intervention without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption may be warranted for acute GIB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5580916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55809162017-09-15 Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding Nagata, Naoyoshi Sakurai, Toshiyuki Moriyasu, Shiori Shimbo, Takuro Okubo, Hidetaka Watanabe, Kazuhiro Yokoi, Chizu Yanase, Mikio Akiyama, Junichi Uemura, Naomi PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB. METHODS: Baseline, endoscopy, and outcome data were reviewed for 314 patients with acute GIB: 157 anticoagulant users and 157 age-, sex-, and important risk-matched non-users. Data were also compared between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin users. RESULTS: Between anticoagulant users and non-users, of whom 70% underwent early endoscopy, no endoscopy-related adverse events or significant differences were found in the rate of endoscopic therapy need, transfusion need, rebleeding, or thromboembolism. Rebleeding was associated with shock, comorbidities, low platelet count and albumin level, and low-dose aspirin use but not HAS-BLED score, any endoscopic results, heparin bridge, or international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.5. Risks for thromboembolism were INR ≥ 2.5, difference in onset and pre-endoscopic INR, reversal agent use, and anticoagulant interruption but not CHA2DS2-VASc score, any endoscopic results, or heparin bridge. In patients without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption, there was only one rebleeding event and no thromboembolic events. Warfarin users had a significantly higher transfusion need than DOACs users. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy appears to be safe for anticoagulant users with acute GIB compared with non-users. Patient background factors were associated with rebleeding, whereas anticoagulant management factors (e.g. INR correction, reversal agent use, and drug interruption) were associated with thromboembolism. Early intervention without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption may be warranted for acute GIB. Public Library of Science 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5580916/ /pubmed/28863196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183423 Text en © 2017 Nagata et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nagata, Naoyoshi Sakurai, Toshiyuki Moriyasu, Shiori Shimbo, Takuro Okubo, Hidetaka Watanabe, Kazuhiro Yokoi, Chizu Yanase, Mikio Akiyama, Junichi Uemura, Naomi Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
title | Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_full | Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_fullStr | Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_short | Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
title_sort | impact of inr monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagatanaoyoshi impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT sakuraitoshiyuki impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT moriyasushiori impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT shimbotakuro impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT okubohidetaka impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT watanabekazuhiro impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT yokoichizu impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT yanasemikio impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT akiyamajunichi impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding AT uemuranaomi impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding |