Cargando…

Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagata, Naoyoshi, Sakurai, Toshiyuki, Moriyasu, Shiori, Shimbo, Takuro, Okubo, Hidetaka, Watanabe, Kazuhiro, Yokoi, Chizu, Yanase, Mikio, Akiyama, Junichi, Uemura, Naomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183423
_version_ 1783260966294650880
author Nagata, Naoyoshi
Sakurai, Toshiyuki
Moriyasu, Shiori
Shimbo, Takuro
Okubo, Hidetaka
Watanabe, Kazuhiro
Yokoi, Chizu
Yanase, Mikio
Akiyama, Junichi
Uemura, Naomi
author_facet Nagata, Naoyoshi
Sakurai, Toshiyuki
Moriyasu, Shiori
Shimbo, Takuro
Okubo, Hidetaka
Watanabe, Kazuhiro
Yokoi, Chizu
Yanase, Mikio
Akiyama, Junichi
Uemura, Naomi
author_sort Nagata, Naoyoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB. METHODS: Baseline, endoscopy, and outcome data were reviewed for 314 patients with acute GIB: 157 anticoagulant users and 157 age-, sex-, and important risk-matched non-users. Data were also compared between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin users. RESULTS: Between anticoagulant users and non-users, of whom 70% underwent early endoscopy, no endoscopy-related adverse events or significant differences were found in the rate of endoscopic therapy need, transfusion need, rebleeding, or thromboembolism. Rebleeding was associated with shock, comorbidities, low platelet count and albumin level, and low-dose aspirin use but not HAS-BLED score, any endoscopic results, heparin bridge, or international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.5. Risks for thromboembolism were INR ≥ 2.5, difference in onset and pre-endoscopic INR, reversal agent use, and anticoagulant interruption but not CHA2DS2-VASc score, any endoscopic results, or heparin bridge. In patients without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption, there was only one rebleeding event and no thromboembolic events. Warfarin users had a significantly higher transfusion need than DOACs users. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy appears to be safe for anticoagulant users with acute GIB compared with non-users. Patient background factors were associated with rebleeding, whereas anticoagulant management factors (e.g. INR correction, reversal agent use, and drug interruption) were associated with thromboembolism. Early intervention without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption may be warranted for acute GIB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5580916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55809162017-09-15 Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding Nagata, Naoyoshi Sakurai, Toshiyuki Moriyasu, Shiori Shimbo, Takuro Okubo, Hidetaka Watanabe, Kazuhiro Yokoi, Chizu Yanase, Mikio Akiyama, Junichi Uemura, Naomi PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB. METHODS: Baseline, endoscopy, and outcome data were reviewed for 314 patients with acute GIB: 157 anticoagulant users and 157 age-, sex-, and important risk-matched non-users. Data were also compared between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin users. RESULTS: Between anticoagulant users and non-users, of whom 70% underwent early endoscopy, no endoscopy-related adverse events or significant differences were found in the rate of endoscopic therapy need, transfusion need, rebleeding, or thromboembolism. Rebleeding was associated with shock, comorbidities, low platelet count and albumin level, and low-dose aspirin use but not HAS-BLED score, any endoscopic results, heparin bridge, or international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.5. Risks for thromboembolism were INR ≥ 2.5, difference in onset and pre-endoscopic INR, reversal agent use, and anticoagulant interruption but not CHA2DS2-VASc score, any endoscopic results, or heparin bridge. In patients without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption, there was only one rebleeding event and no thromboembolic events. Warfarin users had a significantly higher transfusion need than DOACs users. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy appears to be safe for anticoagulant users with acute GIB compared with non-users. Patient background factors were associated with rebleeding, whereas anticoagulant management factors (e.g. INR correction, reversal agent use, and drug interruption) were associated with thromboembolism. Early intervention without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption may be warranted for acute GIB. Public Library of Science 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5580916/ /pubmed/28863196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183423 Text en © 2017 Nagata et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nagata, Naoyoshi
Sakurai, Toshiyuki
Moriyasu, Shiori
Shimbo, Takuro
Okubo, Hidetaka
Watanabe, Kazuhiro
Yokoi, Chizu
Yanase, Mikio
Akiyama, Junichi
Uemura, Naomi
Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
title Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
title_fullStr Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
title_short Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
title_sort impact of inr monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183423
work_keys_str_mv AT nagatanaoyoshi impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT sakuraitoshiyuki impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT moriyasushiori impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT shimbotakuro impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT okubohidetaka impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT watanabekazuhiro impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT yokoichizu impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT yanasemikio impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT akiyamajunichi impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding
AT uemuranaomi impactofinrmonitoringreversalagentuseheparinbridgingandanticoagulantinterruptiononrebleedingandthromboembolisminacutegastrointestinalbleeding