Cargando…

Health utilities for chronic low back pain

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem, with a large potential for primary prevention. Health utilities (HU) reflect which proportion of their expected remaining life time individuals would hypothetically trade to be alleviated of a health condition of interest. A value o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidler, Anna Lene, Rethberg, Constanze, Schmitt, Jochen, Nienhaus, Albert, Seidler, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0172-7
_version_ 1783261048371937280
author Seidler, Anna Lene
Rethberg, Constanze
Schmitt, Jochen
Nienhaus, Albert
Seidler, Andreas
author_facet Seidler, Anna Lene
Rethberg, Constanze
Schmitt, Jochen
Nienhaus, Albert
Seidler, Andreas
author_sort Seidler, Anna Lene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem, with a large potential for primary prevention. Health utilities (HU) reflect which proportion of their expected remaining life time individuals would hypothetically trade to be alleviated of a health condition of interest. A value of 0 means “prefer to die immediately”, a value of 1 means “not willing to trade any life time”. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess HU for LBP patients and for healthy participants and to examine whether HU for LBP are useful indicators to substantiate preventive and therapeutic decision making. METHODS: Healthy participants (n = 126) and LBP patients (n = 32) were recruited mainly among the employees of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. Standardized LBP scenarios were presented to all participants and HU values were assessed using the time-trade-off method. RESULTS: Median HU for LBP were 0.90 (IQR 0.31) for participants and 0.93 (IQR 0.10) for LBP patients. Measurements were consistent across illness severity ratings with HU and with a visual analogue scale (VAS); in the healthy sample the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.61 (95% CI 0.23–1.00, F(1125) = 190, p < .001), in the patient sample the ICC was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.24–1.00, F(1,31) = 62, p < .001). 8% of participants reported HU of 1. There was no statistically significant relation between HU and age, income, or gender. CONCLUSION: On average, participants chose a 7 to 10% shorter life expectancy to avoid LBP, but almost 1 in 10 participants were not willing to trade any life years. The results indicate a certain stability of HU due to the comparability of HU ratings across patients and healthy participants, the measurement consistency when comparing VAS and HU ratings, and the lack of association between demographic variables and HU. This underlines the usefulness of HU for measuring illness severity in comparative health economics evaluations of preventive and therapeutic measures that address chronic LBP or other pain-characterized diseases. Future studies should focus on different LBP intensities and derive stratified HU that reflect the distribution of pain intensity in the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5581438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55814382017-09-06 Health utilities for chronic low back pain Seidler, Anna Lene Rethberg, Constanze Schmitt, Jochen Nienhaus, Albert Seidler, Andreas J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem, with a large potential for primary prevention. Health utilities (HU) reflect which proportion of their expected remaining life time individuals would hypothetically trade to be alleviated of a health condition of interest. A value of 0 means “prefer to die immediately”, a value of 1 means “not willing to trade any life time”. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess HU for LBP patients and for healthy participants and to examine whether HU for LBP are useful indicators to substantiate preventive and therapeutic decision making. METHODS: Healthy participants (n = 126) and LBP patients (n = 32) were recruited mainly among the employees of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. Standardized LBP scenarios were presented to all participants and HU values were assessed using the time-trade-off method. RESULTS: Median HU for LBP were 0.90 (IQR 0.31) for participants and 0.93 (IQR 0.10) for LBP patients. Measurements were consistent across illness severity ratings with HU and with a visual analogue scale (VAS); in the healthy sample the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.61 (95% CI 0.23–1.00, F(1125) = 190, p < .001), in the patient sample the ICC was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.24–1.00, F(1,31) = 62, p < .001). 8% of participants reported HU of 1. There was no statistically significant relation between HU and age, income, or gender. CONCLUSION: On average, participants chose a 7 to 10% shorter life expectancy to avoid LBP, but almost 1 in 10 participants were not willing to trade any life years. The results indicate a certain stability of HU due to the comparability of HU ratings across patients and healthy participants, the measurement consistency when comparing VAS and HU ratings, and the lack of association between demographic variables and HU. This underlines the usefulness of HU for measuring illness severity in comparative health economics evaluations of preventive and therapeutic measures that address chronic LBP or other pain-characterized diseases. Future studies should focus on different LBP intensities and derive stratified HU that reflect the distribution of pain intensity in the population. BioMed Central 2017-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5581438/ /pubmed/28878813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0172-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Seidler, Anna Lene
Rethberg, Constanze
Schmitt, Jochen
Nienhaus, Albert
Seidler, Andreas
Health utilities for chronic low back pain
title Health utilities for chronic low back pain
title_full Health utilities for chronic low back pain
title_fullStr Health utilities for chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Health utilities for chronic low back pain
title_short Health utilities for chronic low back pain
title_sort health utilities for chronic low back pain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0172-7
work_keys_str_mv AT seidlerannalene healthutilitiesforchroniclowbackpain
AT rethbergconstanze healthutilitiesforchroniclowbackpain
AT schmittjochen healthutilitiesforchroniclowbackpain
AT nienhausalbert healthutilitiesforchroniclowbackpain
AT seidlerandreas healthutilitiesforchroniclowbackpain