Cargando…

Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012

BACKGROUND: To assess the trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese prostate cancer patients who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. METHODS: A total of 7768 patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Nobumichi, Nakai, Yasushi, Miyake, Makito, Anai, Satoshi, Inoue, Takeshi, Fujii, Tomomi, Konishi, Noboru, Fujimoto, Kiyohide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28865421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3637-2
_version_ 1783261054009081856
author Tanaka, Nobumichi
Nakai, Yasushi
Miyake, Makito
Anai, Satoshi
Inoue, Takeshi
Fujii, Tomomi
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
author_facet Tanaka, Nobumichi
Nakai, Yasushi
Miyake, Makito
Anai, Satoshi
Inoue, Takeshi
Fujii, Tomomi
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
author_sort Tanaka, Nobumichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese prostate cancer patients who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. METHODS: A total of 7768 patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals between 2004 and 2012 were enrolled. The trends in risk classification and primary therapy in 2004–2006 (prior period), 2007–2009 (middle period), and 2010–2012 (latter period) were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of high-risk and worse patients significantly decreased in the latter period compared to the prior period (p < 0.001), while that of intermediate-risk patients significantly increased over the years (p < 0.001). The proportion of primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) was 50% in the prior period, 40% in the middle period, and 30% in the latter period, respectively. The proportions of radiation therapy and active surveillance significantly increased. The proportion of radical prostatectomy remained similar over these periods (30%). The primary therapy was significantly different between the three periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients significantly decreased in the latter period. The use of PADT also significantly decreased, while radiation therapy and active surveillance significantly increased over these periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5581463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55814632017-09-06 Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012 Tanaka, Nobumichi Nakai, Yasushi Miyake, Makito Anai, Satoshi Inoue, Takeshi Fujii, Tomomi Konishi, Noboru Fujimoto, Kiyohide BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese prostate cancer patients who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. METHODS: A total of 7768 patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals between 2004 and 2012 were enrolled. The trends in risk classification and primary therapy in 2004–2006 (prior period), 2007–2009 (middle period), and 2010–2012 (latter period) were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of high-risk and worse patients significantly decreased in the latter period compared to the prior period (p < 0.001), while that of intermediate-risk patients significantly increased over the years (p < 0.001). The proportion of primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) was 50% in the prior period, 40% in the middle period, and 30% in the latter period, respectively. The proportions of radiation therapy and active surveillance significantly increased. The proportion of radical prostatectomy remained similar over these periods (30%). The primary therapy was significantly different between the three periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients significantly decreased in the latter period. The use of PADT also significantly decreased, while radiation therapy and active surveillance significantly increased over these periods. BioMed Central 2017-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5581463/ /pubmed/28865421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3637-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanaka, Nobumichi
Nakai, Yasushi
Miyake, Makito
Anai, Satoshi
Inoue, Takeshi
Fujii, Tomomi
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
title Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
title_full Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
title_fullStr Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
title_full_unstemmed Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
title_short Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
title_sort trends in risk classification and primary therapy of japanese patients with prostate cancer in nara urological research and treatment group (nurtg) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28865421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3637-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakanobumichi trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT nakaiyasushi trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT miyakemakito trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT anaisatoshi trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT inouetakeshi trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT fujiitomomi trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT konishinoboru trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012
AT fujimotokiyohide trendsinriskclassificationandprimarytherapyofjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurologicalresearchandtreatmentgroupnurtgcomparisonbetween2004200620072009and20102012