Cargando…

Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study

International advocacy of patient-centred healthcare delivery has led to emphasis on the (re)design and evaluation of healthcare processes and outcomes from a patient perspective. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have significant potential to inform such attempts. However there is limited u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costal Tirado, A., McDermott, A. M., Thomas, C., Ferrick, D., Harris, J., Edwards, A., McAllister, Marion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28281044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0079-6
_version_ 1783261123118628864
author Costal Tirado, A.
McDermott, A. M.
Thomas, C.
Ferrick, D.
Harris, J.
Edwards, A.
McAllister, Marion
author_facet Costal Tirado, A.
McDermott, A. M.
Thomas, C.
Ferrick, D.
Harris, J.
Edwards, A.
McAllister, Marion
author_sort Costal Tirado, A.
collection PubMed
description International advocacy of patient-centred healthcare delivery has led to emphasis on the (re)design and evaluation of healthcare processes and outcomes from a patient perspective. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have significant potential to inform such attempts. However there is limited understanding of the processes by which this can be achieved. This exploratory study followed attempts to utilise two different PROMs measures to support service quality improvement in clinical genetics. PROMs used were the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24), a well-validated clinical genetics-specific PROM and Euroqol (EQ-5D), a generic PROM favoured by the UK National Institute for Health and Excellence (NICE). Both of these PROMs enable pre/post intervention comparison. A service audit tool was also used, premised on a patient-reported experience measure. In addition, the study draws on interviews with clinical staff to identify challenges associated with the use of PROMs (response rate, data collection, analysis). Benefits are also explored and include the provision of insight into patients’ needs; complementing clinical judgement; identification of needs being met, evidencing the benefit of services provided; prompting consideration of areas requiring attention; and encouraging professional development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10897-017-0079-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55820732017-09-19 Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study Costal Tirado, A. McDermott, A. M. Thomas, C. Ferrick, D. Harris, J. Edwards, A. McAllister, Marion J Genet Couns Original Research International advocacy of patient-centred healthcare delivery has led to emphasis on the (re)design and evaluation of healthcare processes and outcomes from a patient perspective. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have significant potential to inform such attempts. However there is limited understanding of the processes by which this can be achieved. This exploratory study followed attempts to utilise two different PROMs measures to support service quality improvement in clinical genetics. PROMs used were the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24), a well-validated clinical genetics-specific PROM and Euroqol (EQ-5D), a generic PROM favoured by the UK National Institute for Health and Excellence (NICE). Both of these PROMs enable pre/post intervention comparison. A service audit tool was also used, premised on a patient-reported experience measure. In addition, the study draws on interviews with clinical staff to identify challenges associated with the use of PROMs (response rate, data collection, analysis). Benefits are also explored and include the provision of insight into patients’ needs; complementing clinical judgement; identification of needs being met, evidencing the benefit of services provided; prompting consideration of areas requiring attention; and encouraging professional development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10897-017-0079-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-03-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5582073/ /pubmed/28281044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0079-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Costal Tirado, A.
McDermott, A. M.
Thomas, C.
Ferrick, D.
Harris, J.
Edwards, A.
McAllister, Marion
Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study
title Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study
title_full Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study
title_fullStr Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study
title_full_unstemmed Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study
title_short Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study
title_sort using patient-reported outcome measures for quality improvement in clinical genetics: an exploratory study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28281044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0079-6
work_keys_str_mv AT costaltiradoa usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy
AT mcdermottam usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy
AT thomasc usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy
AT ferrickd usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy
AT harrisj usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy
AT edwardsa usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy
AT mcallistermarion usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforqualityimprovementinclinicalgeneticsanexploratorystudy